Prognostic Factors in Patients with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression Secondary to Lung Cancer-A Retrospective UK Single-Centre Study

Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: Treat the Patient, Not the Disease

INTRODUCTION

The management of metastatic spinal cord compression (mSCC) is a demanding task. The main challenges of mSCC include various manifestations and unpredictable outcomes with indiscriminate treatment recommendations. Because of attendant urgency with potentially devastating health consequences, the SCC is an emotionally disturbing experience whose management could take an impulsive rather than rational approach. The treatment strategy is particularly problematic when mSCC is caused by a malignant lymphoma with its protean attributes.

CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old female presented with generalized body pain and weight loss. Imaging studies revealed a vast bulk of the disease involving lymph nodes, spleen, visceral organs, musculature, marrow, and bones including vertebrae with extension into the spinal canal. A biopsy of the chest wall mass showed high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine demonstrated diffuse marrow replacement by the tumor of the thoracic and lumbar spine with compression of the cord. The prompt treatment with corticosteroids and immunochemotherapy (ICT) was recommended, but the patient elected to seek a second opinion. After two doses of radiation therapy, the patient's general condition rapidly deteriorated and she was hospitalized for systemic ICT. Despite the treatment, her condition continued to deteriorate, and she died 3 weeks after the presentation.

CONCLUSION

The presented case demonstrates some hitherto unaddressed challenges in evaluation and treatment of mSCC caused by aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LSSC). The case scrutinizes the role of MRI in uncommon clinical situations. The case has also exposed some ethical issues associated with the proper management of LSCC.

Impact of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fracture (pVCF) in neurological and survival prognosis

BACKGROUND

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) and pathological vertebral compression fractures (pVCF) are the most serious debilitating morbidities of spine metastases (SpMs) causing devastating neurological damages. The respective impact of these two metastasis-spreading entities on survival and on neurological damage is debated.

METHODS

A French prospective cohort study collected 279 consecutive patients presenting with SpMs between January 2017 and 2021. We compared 174 patients with MESCC and 105 patients with pVCF.

RESULTS

The median Overall Survival (OS) for the MESCC group was 13.4 months (SD 1.5) vs 19.2 months (SD 2.3) for pVCF patients (p = 0.085). Sixty-five patients (23.3 %) were operated on: 49/65 (75.4 %) in the MESCC group and 16/65 (15.2 %) in the pVCF group, p < 0.0001. At 6 months FU, in the MESCC group, 21/44 (45.4 %) of non-ambulatory patients at onset improved to ambulatory status (Frankel D-E) vs 10/13 (76.9 %) in the pVCF group (p = 0.007). In multivariable analysis with the Cox proportional hazard model, good ECOG-PS and SINS Score 7-12 [HR: 6.755, 95 % CI 2.40-19.00; p = 0.001] were good prognostic factors for preserved ambulatory neurological status. However, SpMs diagnosed synchronously with the primary tumor [HR: 0.397, 95 % CI 0.185-0.853; p = 0.018] and MESCC [HR: 0.058, 95 % CI 0.107-0.456; p = 0.007] were independent risk factors for impaired neurological function.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to pVCF, MESCC causes neurological damage. Nevertheless, neurological recovery remains possible. MESCC and pVCF have no impact on survival. The management of MESCC remains to be clarified and optimized to reduce neurological damage.