Auranofin Induces Lethality Driven by Reactive Oxygen Species in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cells

Metal (Au, Pt, Pd, Ni) Bis(dithiolene) complexes as dual-action agents combating cancer and trypanosomatid infections

Cancer and infection diseases pose severe threats to public health worldwide stressing the need for more effective and efficient treatments. Thus, the search for broad-spectrum activity drugs seems justifiable and urgent. Herein, we investigate the anticancer and antitrypanosomatid (anti-Trypanosoma cruzi) activities of eight monoanionic metal bis(dithiolene) complexes, [Ph4P][M(R-thiazdt)2] with Mn+ = Au3+, Pt2+, Pd2+, Ni2+, containing N-alkyl-1,3-thiazoline-2-thione dithiolene ligands (R-thiazdt) with different alkyl groups (R = Et, tBu). Compared to auranofin (AF) and cisplatin (CP), two reference drugs in clinical use, all complexes showed high anticancer activities against A2780 ovarian cancer cells (IC50 values of 0.6-3.8 μM) some also being able to overcome CP resistance in A2780cisR cells. The selectivity index (SI), the IC50 values on normal cells (HDF) vs. A2780 cells, indicated good anticancer specificity (SI > 3) for most of the complexes but with clinical relevance for [Ph4P][Pd(tBu-thiazdt)2] (SI = 10). All complexes showed relevant antitrypanosomatid activities (IC50 values of 2.6-5.8 μM) some even exhibiting lower IC50 values than the reference drug nifurtimox (NFX). The mechanism of cell death seemed to be mediated mainly by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), although to lesser extent for the gold complexes but superior to AF. Although ROS play a role in the main apoptotic pathways, cell death by apoptosis was not evident as shown by the caspase-3/7 assay and the morphological cell features studies by electron microscopy (SEM). Results obtained evidenced that [Ph4P][Pt(tBu-thiazdt)2] and [Ph4P][Pd(tBu-thiazdt)2] complexes might have potential as novel anticancer and antitrypanosomatid agents as alternatives to current therapeutics.

Targeting PAX8 sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to ferroptosis by inhibiting glutathione synthesis

Ovarian cancer is a malignant tumor originating from the ovary, characterized by its high mortality rate and propensity for recurrence. In some patients, especially those with recurrent cancer, conventional treatments such as surgical resection or standard chemotherapy yield suboptimal results. Consequently, there is an urgent need for novel anti-cancer therapeutic strategies. Ferroptosis is a distinct form of cell death separate from apoptosis. Ferroptosis inducers have demonstrated promising potential in the treatment of ovarian cancer, with evidence indicating their ability to enhance ovarian cancer cell sensitivity to cisplatin. However, resistance of cancer cells to ferroptosis still remains an inevitable challenge. Here, we analyzed genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of function screens and identified PAX8 as a ferroptosis resistance protein in ovarian cancer. We identified PAX8 as a susceptibility gene in GPX4-dependent ovarian cancer. Depletion of PAX8 rendered GPX4-dependent ovarian cancer cells significantly more sensitive to GPX4 inhibitors. Additionally, we found that PAX8 inhibited ferroptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Combined treatment with a PAX8 inhibitor and RSL3 suppressed ovarian cancer cell growth, induced ferroptosis, and was validated in a xenograft mouse model. Further exploration of the molecular mechanisms underlying PAX8 inhibition of ferroptosis mutations revealed upregulation of glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (GCLC) expression. GCLC mediated the ferroptosis resistance induced by PAX8 in ovarian cancer. In conclusion, our study underscores the pivotal role of PAX8 as a therapeutic target in GPX4-dependent ovarian cancer. The combination of PAX8 inhibitors such as losartan and captopril with ferroptosis inducers represents a promising new approach for ovarian cancer therapy.

Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Alleviates Mitochondria Damage in Radiation-Induced Lung Injury in a MOTS-c-Dependent Manner

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is a prevalent complication of thoracic tumor radiotherapy and accidental radiation exposure. Pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ), a novel vitamin B, plays a crucial role in delaying aging, antioxidation, anti-inflammation, and antiapoptosis. This study aims to investigate the protective effect and mechanisms of PQQ against RILI. C57BL/6 mice were exposed to a 20 Gy dose of X-ray radiation on the entire thorax with or without daily oral administration of PQQ for 2 weeks. PQQ effectively mitigated radiation-induced lung tissue damage, inflammation, oxidative stress, and epithelial cell apoptosis. Additionally, PQQ significantly inhibited oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage in MLE-12 cells. Mechanistically, PQQ upregulated the mRNA and protein levels of MOTS-c in irradiated lung tissue and MLE-12 cells. Knockdown of MOTS-c by siRNA substantially attenuated the protective effects of PQQ on oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis. In conclusion, PQQ alleviates RILI by preserving mitochondrial function through a MOTS-c-dependent mechanism, suggesting that PQQ may serve as a promising nutraceutical intervention against RILI.

Pro-Oxidant Auranofin and Glutathione-Depleting Combination Unveils Synergistic Lethality in Glioblastoma Cells with Aberrant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most prevalent and advanced malignant primary brain tumor in adults. GBM frequently harbors epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild-type (EGFRwt) gene amplification and/or EGFRvIII activating mutation. EGFR-driven GBM relies on the thioredoxin (Trx) and/or glutathione (GSH) antioxidant systems to withstand the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The impact of EGFRwt or EGFRvIII overexpression on the response to a Trx/GSH co-targeting strategy is unknown. In this study, we investigated Trx/GSH co-targeting in the context of EGFR overexpression in GBM. Auranofin is a thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) inhibitor, FDA-approved for rheumatoid arthritis. L-buthionine-sulfoximine (L-BSO) inhibits GSH synthesis by targeting the glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic (GCLC) enzyme subunit. We analyzed the mechanisms of cytotoxicity of auranofin and the interaction between auranofin and L-BSO in U87MG, U87/EGFRwt, and U87/EGFRvIII GBM isogenic GBM cell lines. ROS-dependent effects were assessed using the antioxidant N-acetylsteine. We show that auranofin decreased TrxR1 activity and increased ROS. Auranofin decreased cell vitality and colony formation and increased protein polyubiquitination through ROS-dependent mechanisms, suggesting the role of ROS in auranofin-induced cytotoxicity in the three cell lines. ROS-dependent PARP-1 cleavage was associated with EGFRvIII downregulation in U87/EGFRvIII cells. Remarkably, the auranofin and L-BSO combination induced the significant depletion of intracellular GSH and synergistic cytotoxicity regardless of EGFR overexpression. Nevertheless, molecular mechanisms associated with cytotoxicity were modulated to a different extent among the three cell lines. U87/EGFRvIII exhibited the most prominent ROS increase, P-AKT(Ser-473), and AKT decrease along with drastic EGFRvIII downregulation. U87/EGFRwt and U87/EGFRvIII displayed lower basal intracellular GSH levels and synergistic ROS-dependent DNA damage compared to U87MG cells. Our study provides evidence for ROS-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity of auranofin and L-BSO combination in GBM in vitro. Unraveling the sensitivity of EGFR-overexpressing cells to auranofin alone, and synergistic auranofin and L-BSO combination, supports the rationale to repurpose this promising pro-oxidant treatment strategy in GBM.

Auranofin-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles Demonstrate Potency against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinical challenge due to molecular, metabolic, and genetic heterogeneity as well as the lack of validated drug targets. Thus, therapies or delivery paradigms are needed. Gold-derived compounds including the FDA-approved drug, auranofin have shown promise as effective anticancer agents against several tumors. To improve the solubility and bioavailability of auranofin, we hypothesized that the nanodelivery of auranofin using biodegradable chitosan modified polyethylene glycol (PEG) nanoparticles (NPs) will enhance anticancer activity against TNBC by comparing the best nanoformulation with the free drug. The selection of the nanoformulation was based on synthesis of various chitosan PEG copolymers via formaldehyde-mediated engraftment of PEG onto chitosan to form [chitosan-g-PEG] copolymer. Furthermore, altered physiochemical properties of the copolymer was based on the formaldehyde ratio towards nanoparticles (CP 1-4 NPs). Following the recruitment of PEG onto the chitosan polymer surface, we explored how this process influenced the stiffness of the nanoparticle using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a factor crucial for in vitro and in vivo studies. Our objective was to ensure the full functionality and inherent properties of chitosan as the parent polymer was maintained without allowing PEG to overshadow chitosan's unique cationic properties while improving solubility in neutral pH. Hence, CP 2 NP was chosen. To demonstrate the efficacy of CP 2 NP as a good delivery carrier for auranofin, we administered a dose of 3 mg/kg of auranofin, in contrast to free auranofin, which was given at 5 mg/kg. In vivo studies revealed the potency of encapsulated auranofin against TNBC cells with a severe necrotic effect following treatment superior to that of free auranofin. In conclusion, chitosan-g-PEG nanoparticles have the potential to be an excellent delivery system for auranofin, increasing its effectiveness and potentially reducing its clinical limitations.

Vitality, viability, long-term clonogenic survival, cytotoxicity, cytostasis and lethality: what do they mean when testing new investigational oncology drugs?

In the field of experimental therapeutics for oncology purposes researchers are continuously evaluating the toxicity of novel treatment approaches against cancer cells. Within this topic of research, it is highly critical to define parameters of toxicity that denote when cancer cells are perturbed in their functionality by a new investigational drug. As the goal for these approaches is to achieve cellular demise, then what approaches to use and what do they mean in terms of assessing such cell death is of critical importance. In this comment article we highlight the definition of vitality and differentiate it from viability, and further define clonogenic survival in a chronic fashion. Additionally, we highly recommend the use of the term cytotoxicity as a general descriptor indicating toxicity towards a cell, but within that we encourage to sub-classify it as either cytostasis (i.e., when a treatment does not allow a cell to grow but it does not kill it either), or lethality (when a cell dies in response to the treatment). A more precise use of these terms should help advance the field of experimental therapeutics in oncology towards better defining the mechanisms of action of novel investigational drugs.