Comparison of Multiparametric MRI, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT, and Clinical Nomograms for Primary T and N Staging of Intermediate-to-High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Development and validation of biopsy free nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions

To develop and validate biopsy-free nomograms to more accurately predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥ 4 lesions. A cohort of 931 patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions, undergoing prostate biopsies or radical prostatectomy from January 2020 to August 2023, was analyzed. Various clinical variables, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), prostate health index (PHI), and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) from PSMA PET-CT imaging, were assessed for predicting csPCa. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision-curve analyses, with internal validation. The foundational model (nomogram 1) encompassed the entire cohort, accurately predicting csPCa by incorporating variables such as age, PSAD, PV, PSA ratio variations, suspicious lesion location, and history of acute urinary retention (AUR). The AUC for csPCa prediction achieved by the foundational model was 0.918, with internal validation confirming reliability (AUC: 0.908). Advanced models (nomogram 2 and 3), incorporating PHI and PHI + PSMA SUVmax, achieved AUCs of 0.908 and 0.955 in the training set and 0.847 and 0.949 in the validation set, respectively. Decision analysis indicated enhanced biopsy outcome predictions with the advanced models. Nomogram 3 could potentially reduce biopsies by 92.41%, while missing only 1.53% of csPCa cases. In conclusion, the newly biopsy-free approaches for patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions represent a significant advancement in csPCa diagnosis in this high-risk population.

PSMA PET vs. mpMRI for Lymph Node Metastasis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Comparative Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in prostate cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published up to August 24, 2024. Studies comparing PSMA PET and mpMRI accuracy in detecting LNM in prostate cancer were included. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

This study included 23 articles with a total of 3041 patients. The pooled analysis showed PSMA PET had a sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI:0.62-0.85) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI:0.93-0.98) for detecting prostate cancer LNM, while mpMRI had a sensitivity of 0.45 (95% CI:0.32-0.57) and specificity at 0.92 (95% CI:0.86-0.97). PSMA PET shows notably higher sensitivity than mpMRI, (P < 0.01) with no significant difference in specificity (P = 0.18). For initial staging, PSMA PET shows significantly higher sensitivity than mpMRI (P < 0.01), with no significant specificity difference (P = 0.17). Subgroup analysis showed that both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [18F]F-PSMA-1007 PET had higher sensitivity than mpMRI (P = 0.03, P < 0.01) without significant differences in specificity (P = 0.10, P = 0.73). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in the sensitivity (P = 0.20) and specificity (P = 0.43) of [18F]F-DCFPyL PET.

CONCLUSION

PSMA PET is more sensitive than mpMRI in detecting LNM in prostate cancer, especially for initial staging; however, there is no significant difference in specificity between the two. Due to the high heterogeneity, more subgroup-based studies are needed to standardize imaging practices and validate these findings.

Update on PSMA-based Prostate Cancer Imaging

The increased use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) based PET imaging for prostate cancer (Pca) detection has revolutionized the clinical management of Pca, with higher diagnostic sensitivity for extraprostatic disease and increasing clinical utility across different stages of the disease. The integration of PSMA PET imaging into clinical guidelines and consensus documents reflects its growing importance in the personalized management of Pca. This review of recent literature highlights the rapid evolution of PSMA PET into the mainstream of staging and restaging and the decreasing reliance on conventional imaging modalities. This comprehensive review serves as a resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the domains of Pca diagnosis and management.

Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI for prostate cancer local staging: a comprehensive review and direct meta-analysis

Purpose

This meta-analysis is conducted to evaluate the comparative diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA PET vs. mpMRI in detecting local staging of prostate cancer(PCa).

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify publications up to February 2024. The analysis included studies that evaluated the direct comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI for local staging of prostate cancer. The reliability of the analyzed studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results

The meta-analysis included 10 articles involving 505 patients, which revealed that both 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI had similar sensitivities and specificities in detecting extracapsular extension(ECE) and seminal vesicle invasion(SVI). The sensitivities for ECE were 0.56 (95% CI: 0.41-0.71) for 68Ga-PSMA PET and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.43-0.71) for mpMRI, and specificities were both 0.84 (68Ga-PSMA PET 95% CI: 0.75-0.91, mpMRI 95% CI: 0.76-0.91).For SVI, sensitivities were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.46-0.68) for 68Ga-PSMA PET and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) for mpMRI, with specificities of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96) for 68Ga-PSMA PET and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.98) for mpMRI. There were no notable variations in sensitivity or specificity between the two methods for detecting ECE and SVI (P = 0.89 and 0.93 for ECE, 0.09 and 0.57 for SVI).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicates that 68Ga-PSMA PET has similar sensitivity and specificity to mpMRI in local prostate cancer staging. Nevertheless, the limited study sample size calls for further, larger prospective studies to validate these findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=522438, identifier CRD42024522438.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value in Positron Emission Tomography-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen

Prostate cancer represents a significant public health challenge, with its management requiring precise diagnostic and prognostic tools. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a cell surface enzyme overexpressed in prostate cancer cells, has emerged as a pivotal biomarker. PSMA's ability to increase the sensitivity of PET imaging has revolutionized its application in the clinical management of prostate cancer. The advancements in PET-PSMA imaging technologies and methodologies, including the development of PSMA-targeted radiotracers and optimized imaging protocols, led to diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility across different stages of prostate cancer. This highlights its superiority in staging and its comparative effectiveness against conventional imaging modalities. This paper analyzes the impact of PET-PSMA on prostate cancer management, discussing the existing challenges and suggesting future research directions. The integration of recent studies and reviews underscores the evolving understanding of PET-PSMA imaging, marking its significant but still expanding role in clinical practice. This comprehensive review serves as a crucial resource for clinicians and researchers involved in the multifaceted domains of prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and management.