Prognostic value of colorectal cancer biomarkers

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of ALU-based cell-free DNA in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern. This study aimed to investigate the role of ALU-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.

Methods

We selected relevant literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Science Direct databases based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. 17 eligible studies were included in the final analysis (13 studies for diagnostic and 4 studies for prognostic meta-analysis). The search covered relevant publications up to July 1, 2024.

Results

The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) of ALU-based cfDNA in CRC diagnosis were 0.81 (95% CI= [0.70, 0.89]), 0.90 (95% CI= [0.70, 0.96]), and 40.58 (95% CI= [17.87, 92.19]), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.92 (95% CI= [0.89, 0.94]). Patients with higher concentrations of plasma/serum ALU-based cfDNA had poorer overall survival (OS) (pooled hazard ratio = 2.33 ([95% CI= [1.80, 3.03]).

Conclusion

The current evidence supports the utility of circulating ALU as a promising non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for CRC. Furthermore, as a potential biomarker, ALU-based cfDNA could play a significant role in clinical application.

Clinical implications

The evidence suggests that circulating ALU-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) holds promise as a non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic tool for colorectal cancer, potentially enhancing clinical decision-making.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO (CRD42023486369).

Cell-free circulating ALU repeats in serum have a prognostic value for colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the only established serum biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). To facilitate therapy decisions and improve the overall survival of CRC patients, prognostic biomarkers are required.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the prognostic value of five different cell free circulating DNA (fcDNA) fragments. The potential markers were ALU115, ALU247, LINE1-79, LINE1-300 and ND1-mt.

METHODS

The copy numbers of the DNA fragments were measured in the peripheral blood serum of 268 CRC patients using qPCR, the results were compared to common and previously described markers.

RESULTS

We found that ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA levels correlate significantly with several clinicopathological parameters. An increased amount of ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA fragments coincides with methylation of HPP1 (P< 0.001; P< 0.01), which proved to be a prognostic marker itself in former studies and also with increased CEA level (P< 0.001). ALU115 and ALU247 can define patients with poor survival in UICC stage IV (Alu115: HR = 2.9; 95% Cl 1.8-4.8, P< 0.001; Alu247: HR = 2.2; 95% Cl 1.3-3.6; P= 0.001). Combining ALU115 and HPP1, the prognostic value in UICC stage IV is highly significant (P< 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that an increased level of ALU fcDNA is an independent prognostic biomarker for advanced colorectal cancer disease.

TRF2 and VEGF-A: an unknown relationship with prognostic impact on survival of colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is one of most common tumors in developed countries and, despite improvements in treatment and diagnosis, mortality rate of patients remains high, evidencing the urgent need of novel biomarkers to properly identify colorectal cancer high-risk patients that would benefit of specific treatments. Recent works have demonstrated that the telomeric protein TRF2 is over-expressed in colorectal cancer and it promotes tumor formation and progression through extra-telomeric functions. Moreover, we and other groups evidenced, both in vitro on established cell lines and in vivo on tumor bearing mice, that TRF2 regulates the vascularization mediated by VEGF-A. In the present paper, our data evidence a tight correlation between TRF2 and VEGF-A with prognostic relevance in colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

For this study we sampled 185 colorectal cancer patients surgically treated and diagnosed at the Regina Elena National Cancer Institute of Rome and investigated the association between the survival outcome and the levels of VEGF-A and TRF2.

RESULTS

Tissue microarray immunohistochemical analyses revealed that TRF2 positively correlates with VEGF-A expression in our cohort of patients. Moreover, analysis of patients' survival, confirmed in a larger dataset of patients from TCGA, demonstrated that co-expression of TRF2 and VEGF-A correlate with a poor clinical outcome in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients, regardless the mutational state of driver oncogenes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results permitted to identify the positive correlation between high levels of TRF2 and VEGF-A as a novel prognostic biomarker for identifying the subset of high-risk colorectal cancer patients that could benefit of specific therapeutic regimens.

High KCNQ1OT1 expression might independently predict shorter survival of colon adenocarcinoma

AIM

To explore the expression profile of KCNQ1OT1 and its prognostic value in colon and rectal adenocarcinoma (COAD and READ) separately.

PATIENTS & METHODS

clinicopathological, genomic and survival data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and GSE39582 were obtained for a secondary analysis.

RESULTS

KCNQ1OT1 was significantly up-regulated in both COAD and READ compared with adjacent normal tissues. However, its up-regulation was only independently associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.18-3.46; p = 0.01) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.54-5.07; p < 0.01) in COAD, but not in READ.

CONCLUSION

KCNQ1OT1 up-regulation might serve as a valuable independent prognostic indicator of shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival of COAD, but not READ.

Gene signatures associated with drug resistance to irinotecan and oxaliplatin predict a poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer

The identification of novel survival predictors may help to improve the appropriate management of colorectal cancer (CRC). In the present study, two gene sets associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin resistance in CRC cell lines were first identified and subsequently applied to the clinical CRC microarray dataset GSE14333. Subsequently, a 60-gene irinotecan resistance-associated signature and a 13-gene oxaliplatin resistance-associated signature were established, which were able to classify CRC patients into high- and low-risk subgroups with varied clinical outcomes [irinotecan-resistance gene signature: hazard ratio (HR)=0.4607, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.3369-0.6300, P<0.0001; oxaliplatin-resistance gene signature: HR=0.6119, 95% CI=0.4547-0.8233, P=0.0008]. The performance of these two gene expression signatures in predicting outcome risk were also validated in two other independent CRC gene expression microarray datasets, GSE17536 (irinotecan-resistance gene signature: HR=0.5318, 95% CI=0.3359-0.8419, P=0.0079; oxaliplatin-resistance gene signature: HR=0.5383, 95% CI=0.3400-0.8521, P=0.0114) and GSE17537 (irinotecan-resistance gene signature: HR=0.2827, 95% CI=0.1173-0.6813, P=0.0088; oxaliplatin-resistance gene signature: HR=0.2378, 95% CI=0.09773-0.5784, P=0.0023). Furthermore, the combination of these two gene classifiers demonstrated a superior performance in CRC prognosis prediction than either used individually. Therefore, this study proposed novel gene classifier models for CRC prognosis prediction, which may be potentially useful to inform treatment decisions for patients with CRC in clinical settings.