Crosstalk between the mTOR and DNA Damage Response Pathways in Fission Yeast

MEPED as salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma incorporating edited non-oncogene addiction: mTOR as a bottleneck

Rescue therapies of relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in the third to sixth-line provide major, yet unresolved problems. The MEPED regimen includes nuclear receptor agonists such as pioglitazone and dexamethasone, which counterbalance HL homeostasis, HL stress response inhibitors, everolimus and COX-2 inhibitor, and a stress response inducer, low-dose metronomic treosulfan. CR (six of seven patients) and long-term cCR in patients receiving no consolidating allogeneic stem cell transplantation highlight MEPED as a potent salvage therapy in advanced refractory HL. MEPED edits everolimus activities in such a way that mTORC1 becomes a non-oncogene addiction bottleneck, hence determining long-term therapy outcome. The implications of the therapeutic paradigm shift toward editing of HL tissue, and particularly mTOR addiction, could prove to be profound for clinical practice, both in terms of outcome and treatment tolerability. The long-term results of MEPED treatment indicate the urgent evaluation of the schedule in a multicenter trial for r/r HL.

TORC2 is required for the accumulation of γH2A in response to DNA damage

TOR protein kinases serve as the catalytic subunit of the TORC1 and TORC2 complexes, which regulate cellular growth, proliferation, and survival. In the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cells lacking TORC2 or its downstream kinase Gad8 (AKT or SGK1 in human cells) exhibit sensitivity to a wide range of stress conditions, including DNA damage stress. One of the first responses to DNA damage is the phosphorylation of C-terminal serine residues within histone H2AX in human cells (γH2AX), or histone H2A in yeast cells (γH2A). The kinases responsible for γH2A in S. pombe are the two DNA damage checkpoint kinases Rad3 and Tel1 (ATR and ATM, respectively, in human cells). Here we report that TORC2-Gad8 signaling is required for accumulation of γH2A in response to DNA damage and during quiescence. Using the TOR-specific inhibitor, Torin1, we demonstrate that the effect of TORC2 on γH2A in response to DNA damage is immediate, rather than adaptive. The lack of γH2A is restored by deletion mutations of transcription and chromatin modification factors, including loss of components of Paf1C, SAGA, Mediator, and the bromo-domain proteins Bdf1/Bdf2. Thus, we suggest that TORC2-Gad8 may affect the accumulation of γH2A by regulating chromatin structure and function.

Evidence that OLE RNA is a component of a major stress-responsive ribonucleoprotein particle in extremophilic bacteria

OLE RNA is a ~600-nucleotide noncoding RNA present in many Gram-positive bacteria that thrive mostly in extreme environments, including elevated temperature, salt, and pH conditions. The precise biochemical functions of this highly conserved RNA remain unknown, but it forms a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex that localizes to cell membranes. Genetic disruption of the RNA or its essential protein partners causes reduced cell growth under various stress conditions. These phenotypes include sensitivity to short-chain alcohols, cold intolerance, reduced growth on sub-optimal carbon sources, and intolerance of even modest concentrations of Mg2+ . Thus, many bacterial species appear to employ OLE RNA as a component of an intricate RNP apparatus to monitor fundamental cellular processes and make physiological and metabolic adaptations. Herein we hypothesize that the OLE RNP complex is functionally equivalent to the eukaryotic TOR complexes, which integrate signals from various diverse pathways to coordinate processes central to cell growth, replication, and survival.

Disruption of the Schizosaccharomyces japonicus lig4 Disturbs Several Cellular Processes and Leads to a Pleiotropic Phenotype

Gene targeting is a commonly used method to reveal the function of genes. Although it is an attractive tool for molecular studies, it can frequently be a challenge because its efficiency can be low and it requires the screening of a large number of transformants. Generally, these problems originate from the elevated level of ectopic integration caused by non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ). To eliminate this problem, NHEJ-related genes are frequently deleted or disrupted. Although these manipulations can improve gene targeting, the phenotype of the mutant strains raised the question of whether mutations have side effects. The aim of this study was to disrupt the lig4 gene in the dimorphic fission yeast, S. japonicus, and investigate the phenotypic changes of the mutant strain. The mutant cells have shown various phenotypic changes, such as increased sporulation on complete medium, decreased hyphal growth, faster chronological aging, and higher sensitivity to heat shock, UV light, and caffeine. In addition, higher flocculation capacity has been observed, especially at lower sugar concentrations. These changes were supported by transcriptional profiling. Many genes belonging to metabolic and transport processes, cell division, or signaling had altered mRNA levels compared to the control strain. Although the disruption improved the gene targeting, we assume that the lig4 inactivation can cause unexpected physiological side effects, and we have to be very careful with the manipulations of the NHEJ-related genes. To reveal the exact mechanisms behind these changes, further investigations are required.

The Intra- and Extra-Telomeric Role of TRF2 in the DNA Damage Response

Telomere repeat binding factor 2 (TRF2) has a well-known function at the telomeres, which acts to protect the telomere end from being recognized as a DNA break or from unwanted recombination. This protection mechanism prevents DNA instability from mutation and subsequent severe diseases caused by the changes in DNA, such as cancer. Since TRF2 actively inhibits the DNA damage response factors from recognizing the telomere end as a DNA break, many more studies have also shown its interactions outside of the telomeres. However, very little has been discovered on the mechanisms involved in these interactions. This review aims to discuss the known function of TRF2 and its interaction with the DNA damage response (DDR) factors at both telomeric and non-telomeric regions. In this review, we will summarize recent progress and findings on the interactions between TRF2 and DDR factors at telomeres and outside of telomeres.