N6-Adenosine Methylation in RNA and a Reduced m3G/TMG Level in Non-Coding RNAs Appear at Microirradiation-Induced DNA Lesions

Insights into the epitranscriptomic role of N6-methyladenosine on aging skeletal muscle

The modification of RNA through the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has emerged as a growing area of research due to its regulatory role in gene expression and various biological processes regulating the expression of genes. m6A RNA methylation is a post-transcriptional modification that is dynamic and reversible and found in mRNA, tRNA, rRNA, and other non-coding RNA of most eukaryotic cells. It is executed by special proteins known as "writers," which initiate methylation; "erasers," which remove methylation; and "readers," which recognize it and regulate the expression of the gene. Modification by m6A regulates gene expression by affecting the splicing, translation, stability, and localization of mRNA. Aging causes molecular and cellular damage, which forms the basis of most age-related diseases. The decline in skeletal muscle mass and functionality because of aging leads to metabolic disorders and morbidities. The inability of aged muscles to regenerate and repair after injury poses a great challenge to the geriatric populace. This review seeks to explore the m6A epigenetic regulation in the myogenesis and regeneration processes in skeletal muscle as well as the progress made on the m6A epigenetic regulation of aging skeletal muscles.

METTL16 participates in haemoglobin H disease through m6A modification

BACKGROUND

Haemoglobin H (HbH) disease is caused by a disorder of α-globin synthesis, and it results in a wide range of clinical symptoms. M6A methylation modification may be one of the mechanisms of heterogeneity. Therefore, this article explored the role of methyltransferase like 16 (METTL16) in HbH disease.

METHOD

The results of epigenetic transcriptome microarray were analysed and verified through bioinformatic methods and qRT-PCR, respectively. The overexpression or knock down of METTL16 in K562 cells was examined to determine its role in reactive oxygen species (ROS), cell cycle processes or iron overload. YTH domain family protein 3 (YTHDF3) was knocked down in K562 cells and K562 cells overexpressing METTL16 via siRNA to investigate its function. In addition, haemoglobin expression was detected through benzidine staining. qRT-PCR, WB, methylated RNA Immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) and (RNA Immunoprecipitation) RIP experiments were conducted to explore the mechanism of intermolecular interaction.

RESULTS

METTL16, YTHDF3 and solute carrier family 5 member 3 (SLC5A3) mRNA and the methylation level of SLC5A3 mRNA were downregulated in HbH patients. Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) mRNA expression was negatively correlated with HGB content among patients with HbH-CS disease. Overexpression of METTL16 increased ROS and intracellular iron contents in K562 cells, changed the K562 cell cycle, reduced hemin-induced haemoglobin synthesis, increased the expressions of SLC5A3 and HBG and increased SLC5A3 mRNA methylation levels. Knockdown of METTL16 reduced ROS and intracellular iron contents in K562 cells. Hemin treatment of K562 cells for more than 14 days reduced the protein expressions of METTL16 and SLC5A3 and SLC5A3 mRNA methylation levels. Knockdown of YTHDF3 rescued the intracellular iron content changes induced by the overexpression of METTL16. The RIP experiment revealed that SLC5A3 mRNA can be enriched by METTL16 antibody.

CONCLUSION

METTL16 may affect the expression of SLC5A3 by changing its m6A modification level and regulating ROS synthesis, intracellular iron and cycle of red blood cells. Moreover, METTL16 possibly affects the expression of haemoglobin through IGF2BP3, which regulates the clinical phenotype of HbH disease.

The epitranscriptome: reshaping the DNA damage response

Genomic instability poses a formidable threat to cellular vitality and wellbeing, prompting cells to deploy an intricate DNA damage response (DDR) mechanism. Recent evidence has suggested that RNA is intricately linked to the DDR by serving as template, scaffold, or regulator during the repair of DNA damage. Additionally, RNA molecules undergo modifications, contributing to the epitranscriptome, a dynamic regulatory layer influencing cellular responses to genotoxic stress. The intricate interplay between RNA and the DDR sheds new light on how the RNA epigenome contributes to the maintenance of genomic integrity and ultimately shapes the fate of damaged cells.

RNA-related DNA damage and repair: The role of N7-methylguanosine in the cell nucleus exposed to UV light

Background

Chemical modifications in mRNAs, tRNAs, rRNAs, and non-coding RNAs stabilize these nucleic acids and regulate their function. In addition to regulating the translation of genetic information from mRNA to proteins, it has been revealed that modifications in RNAs regulate repair processes in the genome.

Methods

Using local laser microirradiation, confocal microscopy, dot blots, and mass spectrometry we studied the role of N7-methylguanosine (m7G), which is co-transcriptionally installed in RNA.

Results

Here, we show that after UVC and UVA irradiation, the level of m7G RNA is increased initially in the cytoplasm, and after local laser microirradiation, m7G RNA is highly abundant in UVA-damaged chromatin. This process is poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-dependent, but not accompanied by changes in the level of m7G-writers, including methyltransferases RNMT, METTL1, and WBSCR22. We also observed that METTL1 deficiency does not affect the recruitment of m7G RNA to microirradiated chromatin. Analyzing the levels of mRNA, let-7e, and miR-203a in both the cytoplasm and the cell nucleus, we revealed that UVC irradiation changed the level of mRNA, and significantly increased the pool of both let-7e and miR-203a, which correlated with radiation-induced m7G RNA increase in the cytoplasm.

Conclusions

Irradiation by UV light increases the m7G RNA pool in the cytoplasm and in the microirradiated genome. Thus, epigenetically modified RNAslikely contribute to DNA damage responses or m7G signals the presence of RNA damage.

RNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification in DNA Damage Response and Cancer Radiotherapy

The N6-methyladenosine (M6A) modification is the most common internal chemical modification of RNA molecules in eukaryotes. This modification can affect mRNA metabolism, regulate RNA transcription, nuclear export, splicing, degradation, and translation, and significantly impact various aspects of physiology and pathobiology. Radiotherapy is the most common method of tumor treatment. Different intrinsic cellular mechanisms affect the response of cells to ionizing radiation (IR) and the effectiveness of cancer radiotherapy. In this review, we summarize and discuss recent advances in understanding the roles and mechanisms of RNA M6A methylation in cellular responses to radiation-induced DNA damage and in determining the outcomes of cancer radiotherapy. Insights into RNA M6A methylation in radiation biology may facilitate the improvement of therapeutic strategies for cancer radiotherapy and radioprotection of normal tissues.

The Role of m6A-Mediated DNA Damage Repair in Tumor Development and Chemoradiotherapy Resistance

Among the post-transcriptional modifications, m6A RNA methylation has gained significant research interest due to its critical role in regulating transcriptional expression. This modification affects RNA metabolism in several ways, including processing, nuclear export, translation, and decay, making it one of the most abundant transcriptional modifications and a crucial regulator of gene expression. The dysregulation of m6A RNA methylation-related proteins in many tumors has been shown to lead to the upregulation of oncoprotein expression, tumor initiation, proliferation, cancer cell progression, and metastasis.Although the impact of m6A RNA methylation on cancer cell growth and proliferation has been extensively studied, its role in DNA repair processes, which are crucial to the pathogenesis of various diseases, including cancer, remains unclear. However, recent studies have shown accumulating evidence that m6A RNA methylation significantly affects DNA repair processes and may play a role in cancer drug resistance. Therefore, a comprehensive literature review is necessary to explore the potential biological role of m6A-modified DNA repair processes in human cancer and cancer drug resistance.In conclusion, m6A RNA methylation is a crucial regulator of gene expression and a potential player in cancer development and drug resistance. Its dysregulation in many tumors leads to the upregulation of oncoprotein expression and tumor progression. Furthermore, the impact of m6A RNA methylation on DNA repair processes, although unclear, may play a crucial role in cancer drug resistance. Therefore, further studies are warranted to better understand the potential biological role of m6A-modified DNA repair processes in human cancer and cancer drug resistance.

METTL16 in human diseases: What should we do next?

METTL16 is a class-I methyltransferase that is responsible for depositing a vertebrate-conserved S-adenosylmethionine site. Since 2017, there has been a growing body of research focused on METTL16, particularly in the field of structural studies. However, the role of METTL16 in cell biogenesis and human diseases has not been extensively studied, with limited understanding of its function in disease pathology. Recent studies have highlighted the complex and sometimes contradictory role that METTL16 plays in various diseases. In this work, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the current research on METTL16 in human diseases.

RNA N6-methyladenosine modification-based biomarkers for absorbed ionizing radiation dose estimation

Radiation triage and biological dosimetry are critical for the medical management of massive potentially exposed individuals following radiological accidents. Here, we performed a genome-wide screening of radiation-responding mRNAs, whose N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels showed significant alteration after acute irradiation. The m6A levels of three genes, Ncoa4, Ate1 and Fgf22, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of mice showed excellent dose-response relationships and could serve as biomarkers of radiation exposure. Especially, the RNA m6A of Ncoa4 maintained a high level as long as 28 days after irradiation. We demonstrated its responsive specificity to radiation, conservation across the mice, monkeys and humans, and the dose-response relationship in PBMCs from cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Finally, NOCA4 m6A-based biodosimetric models were constructed for estimating absorbed radiation doses in mice or humans. Collectively, this study demonstrated the potential feasibility of RNA m6A in radiation accidents management and clinical applications.

PARP-dependent and NAT10-independent acetylation of N4-cytidine in RNA appears in UV-damaged chromatin

RNA modifications have been known for many years, but their function has not been fully elucidated yet. For instance, the regulatory role of acetylation on N4-cytidine (ac4C) in RNA can be explored not only in terms of RNA stability and mRNA translation but also in DNA repair. Here, we observe a high level of ac4C RNA at DNA lesions in interphase cells and irradiated cells in telophase. Ac4C RNA appears in the damaged genome from 2 to 45 min after microirradiation. However, RNA cytidine acetyltransferase NAT10 did not accumulate to damaged sites, and NAT10 depletion did not affect the pronounced recruitment of ac4C RNA to DNA lesions. This process was not dependent on the G1, S, and G2 cell cycle phases. In addition, we observed that the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, prevents the recruitment of ac4C RNA to damaged chromatin. Our data imply that the acetylation of N4-cytidine, especially in small RNAs, has an important role in mediating DNA damage repair. Ac4C RNA likely causes de-condensation of chromatin in the vicinity of DNA lesions, making it accessible for other DNA repair factors involved in the DNA damage response. Alternatively, RNA modifications, including ac4C, could be direct markers of damaged RNAs.

FTO regulates the DNA damage response via effects on cell-cycle progression

The fat mass and obesity-associated protein FTO is an "eraser" of N6-methyladenosine, the most abundant mRNA modification. FTO plays important roles in tumorigenesis. However, its activities have not been fully elucidated and its possible involvement in DNA damage - the early driving event in tumorigenesis - remains poorly characterized. Here, we have investigated the role of FTO in the DNA damage response (DDR) and its underlying mechanisms. We demonstrate that FTO responds to various DNA damage stimuli. FTO is overexpressed in mice following exposure to the promutagens aristolochic acid I and benzo[a]pyrene. Knockout of the FTO gene in TK6 cells, via CRISPR/Cas9, increased genotoxicity induced by DNA damage stimuli (micronucleus and TK mutation assays). Cisplatin- and diepoxybutane-induced micronucleus frequencies and methyl methanesulfonate- and azathioprine-induced TK mutant frequencies were also higher in FTO KO cells. We investigated the potential roles of FTO in DDR. RNA sequencing and enrichment analysis revealed that FTO deletion disrupted the p38 MAPK pathway and inhibited the activation of nucleotide excision repair and cell-cycle-related pathways following cisplatin (DNA intrastrand cross-links) treatment. These effects were confirmed by western blotting and qRT-PCR. FTO deletion impaired cell-cycle arrest at the G2/M phase following cisplatin and diepoxybutane treatment (flow cytometry analysis). Our findings demonstrated that FTO is involved in several aspects of DDR, acting, at least in part, by impairing cell cycle progression.

Role of RNA modifications in carcinogenesis and carcinogen damage response

The field of epitranscriptomics encompasses the study of post-transcriptional RNA modifications and their regulatory enzymes. Among the numerous RNA modifications, N6 -methyladenosine (m6 A) has been identified as the most common internal modification of messenger RNA (mRNA). Although m6 A modifications were first discovered in the 1970s, advances in technology have revived interest in this field, driving an abundance of research into the role of RNA modifications in various biological processes, including cancer. As analogs to epigenetic modifications, RNA modifications also play an important role in carcinogenesis by regulating gene expression post-transcriptionally. A growing body of evidence suggests that carcinogens can modulate RNA modifications to alter the expression of oncogenes or tumor suppressors during cellular transformation. Additionally, the expression and activity of the enzymes that regulate RNA modifications can be dysregulated and contribute to carcinogenesis, making these enzymes promising targets of drug discovery. Here we summarize the roles of RNA modifications during carcinogenesis induced by exposure to various environmental carcinogens, with a main focus on the roles of the most widely studied m6 A mRNA methylation.

Biological roles of the RNA m6A modification and its implications in cancer

The N⁶-Methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification of RNA transcripts is the most prevalent and abundant internal modification in eukaryotic messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and plays diverse and important roles in normal biological processes. Extensive studies have indicated that dysregulated m⁶A modification and m⁶A-associated proteins play critical roles in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. However, m⁶A-mediated physiological consequences often lead to opposite outcomes in a biological context-dependent manner. Therefore, context-related complexity must be meaningfully considered to obtain a comprehensive understanding of RNA methylation. Recently, it has been reported that m⁶A-modified RNAs are closely related to the regulation of the DNA damage response and genomic integrity maintenance. Here, we present an overview of the current knowledge on the m⁶A modification and its function in human cancer, particularly in relation to the DNA damage response and genomic instability.

m6A Methyltransferase METTL3 Reduces Hippocampal Neuron Apoptosis in a Mouse Model of Autism Through the MALAT1/SFRP2/Wnt/β-catenin Axis

OBJECTIVE

Hippocampal neuron apoptosis contributes to autism, while METTL3 has been documented to possess great potentials in neuron apoptosis. Our study probed into the role of METTL3 in neuron apoptosis in autism and to determine the underlying mechanism.

METHODS

Bioinformatics analysis was used to analyze expressed genes in autism samples. Institute of Cancer Research mice were treated with valproic acid to develop autism models. The function of METTL3 in autism-like symptoms in mice was analyzed with behavioral tests and histological examination of their hippocampal tissues. Primary mouse hippocampal neurons were extracted for in vitro studies. Downstream factors of METTL3 were explored and validated.

RESULTS

METTL3, MALAT1, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling were downregulated, while SFRP2 was upregulated in the hippocampal tissues of a mouse model of autism. METTL3 stabilized MALAT1 expression by promoting m6A modification of MALAT1. MALAT1 promoted SFRP2 methylation and led to reduced SFRP2 expression by recruiting DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B to the promoter region of SFRP2. Furthermore, SFRP2 facilitated activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling. By this mechanism, METTL3 suppressed autism-like symptoms and hippocampal neuron apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

This research suggests that METTL3 can reduce autism-like symptoms and hippocampal neuron apoptosis by regulating the MALAT1/SFRP2/Wnt/β-catenin axis.

Epigenetic regulation in radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis (RIPF) is a common and serious adverse effect of radiotherapy for thoracic tumors, which occurs in the irreversible stage of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) >6 months after irradiation. It is characterized by progressive and irreversible destruction of lung tissue and deterioration of lung function, which may impair quality of life and lead to respiratory failure and death. We hope this will draw attention to the involvement of epigenetics in the regulation of RIPF.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes research progress on the role and mechanism of DNA methylation, noncoding RNA and RNA methylation in RIPF or RILI, and the possible role and mechanism of histone modification in RIPF. We have noticed that in tissue fibrosis, the epigenetic regulation mechanisms inside and outside the nucleus can influence each other. We speculate that RIPF may be regulated by an epigenetic regulatory network during its development, and believe that TGF-β, SNAIL, PTEN and EZH2 are four targets worthy of in-depth study.

The Potential Role of m6A RNA Methylation in the Aging Process and Aging-Associated Diseases

N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most common and conserved internal eukaryotic mRNA modification. m⁶A modification is a dynamic and reversible post-transcriptional regulatory modification, initiated by methylase and removed by RNA demethylase. m⁶A-binding proteins recognise the m⁶A modification to regulate gene expression. Recent studies have shown that altered m⁶A levels and abnormal regulator expression are crucial in the ageing process and the occurrence of age-related diseases. In this review, we summarise some key findings in the field of m⁶A modification in the ageing process and age-related diseases, including cell senescence, autophagy, inflammation, oxidative stress, DNA damage, tumours, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We focused on the biological function and potential molecular mechanisms of m⁶A RNA methylation in ageing and age-related disease progression. We believe that m⁶A modification may provide a new target for anti-ageing therapies.

Roles of RNA Modifications in Diverse Cellular Functions

Chemical modifications of RNA molecules regulate both RNA metabolism and fate. The deposition and function of these modifications are mediated by the actions of writer, reader, and eraser proteins. At the cellular level, RNA modifications regulate several cellular processes including cell death, proliferation, senescence, differentiation, migration, metabolism, autophagy, the DNA damage response, and liquid-liquid phase separation. Emerging evidence demonstrates that RNA modifications play active roles in the physiology and etiology of multiple diseases due to their pervasive roles in cellular functions. Here, we will summarize recent advances in the regulatory and functional role of RNA modifications in these cellular functions, emphasizing the context-specific roles of RNA modifications in mammalian systems. As m⁶A is the best studied RNA modification in biological processes, this review will summarize the emerging advances on the diverse roles of m⁶A in cellular functions. In addition, we will also provide an overview for the cellular functions of other RNA modifications, including m⁵C and m¹A. Furthermore, we will also discuss the roles of RNA modifications within the context of disease etiologies and highlight recent advances in the development of therapeutics that target RNA modifications. Elucidating these context-specific functions will increase our understanding of how these modifications become dysregulated during disease pathogenesis and may provide new opportunities for improving disease prevention and therapy by targeting these pathways.

Nanoparticle-Induced m6A RNA Modification: Detection Methods, Mechanisms and Applications

With the increasing application of nanoparticles (NPs) in medical and consumer applications, it is necessary to ensure their safety. As m⁶A (N⁶-methyladenosine) RNA modification is one of the most prevalent RNA modifications involved in many diseases and essential biological processes, the relationship between nanoparticles and m⁶A RNA modification for the modulation of these events has attracted substantial research interest. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the relationship between nanoparticles and m⁶A RNA modification, but evidence is beginning to emerge. Therefore, a summary of these aspects from current research on nanoparticle-induced m⁶A RNA modification is timely and significant. In this review, we highlight the roles of m⁶A RNA modification in the bioimpacts of nanoparticles and thus elaborate on the mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced m⁶A RNA modification. We also summarize the dynamic regulation and biofunctions of m⁶A RNA modification. Moreover, we emphasize recent advances in the application perspective of nanoparticle-induced m⁶A RNA modification in medication and toxicity of nanoparticles to provide a potential method to facilitate the design of nanoparticles by deliberately tuning m⁶A RNA modification.

Early recruitment of PARP-dependent m8A RNA methylation at DNA lesions is subsequently accompanied by active DNA demethylation

RNA methylation, especially 6-methyladenosine (m⁶A)-modified RNAs, plays a specific role in DNA damage response (DDR). Here, we also observe that RNA modified at 8-methyladenosine (m⁸A) is recruited to UVA-damaged chromatin immediately after microirradiation. Interestingly, the level of m⁸A RNA at genomic lesions was reduced after inhibition of histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases. It appears in later phases of DNA damage response, accompanied by active DNA demethylation. Also, PARP inhibitor (PARPi), Olaparib, prevented adenosine methylation at microirradiated chromatin. PARPi abrogated not only m⁶A and m⁸A RNA positivity at genomic lesions, but also XRCC1, the factor of base excision repair (BER), did not recognize lesions in DNA. To this effect, Olaparib enhanced the genome-wide level of γH2AX. This histone modification interacted with m⁸A RNAs to a similar extent as m⁸A RNAs with DNA. Pronounced interaction properties we did not observe for m⁶A RNAs and DNA; however, m⁶A RNA interacted with XRCC1 with the highest efficiency, especially in microirradiated cells. Together, we show that the recruitment of m⁶A RNA and m⁸A RNA to DNA lesions is PARP dependent. We suggest that modified RNAs likely play a role in the BER mechanism accompanied by active DNA demethylation. In this process, γH2AX stabilizes m⁶A/m⁸A-positive RNA-DNA hybrid loops via its interaction with m⁸A RNAs. R-loops could represent basic three-stranded structures recognized by PARP-dependent non-canonical m⁶A/m⁸A-mediated DNA repair pathway.

METTL14 facilitates global genome repair and suppresses skin tumorigenesis

Global genome repair (GGR), a subpathway of nucleotide excision repair, corrects bulky helix-distorting DNA lesions across the whole genome and is essential for preventing mutagenesis and skin cancer. Here, we show that METTL14 (methyltransferase-like 14), a critical component of the N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA methyltransferase complex, promotes GGR through regulating m⁶A mRNA methylation-mediated DDB2 translation and suppresses ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation-induced skin tumorigenesis. UVB irradiation down-regulates METTL14 protein through NBR1-dependent selective autophagy. METTL14 knockdown decreases GGR and DDB2 abundance. Conversely, overexpression of wild-type METTL14 but not its enzymatically inactive mutant increases GGR and DDB2 abundance. METTL14 knockdown decreases m⁶A methylation and translation of the DDB2 transcripts. Adding DDB2 reverses the GGR repair defect in METTL14 knockdown cells, indicating that METTL14 facilitates GGR through regulating DDB2 m⁶A methylation and translation. Similarly, knockdown of YTHDF1, an m⁶A reader promoting translation of m⁶A-modified transcripts, decreases DDB2 protein levels. Both METTL14 and YTHDF1 bind to the DDB2 transcript. In mice, skin-specific heterozygous METTL14 deletion increases UVB-induced skin tumorigenesis. Furthermore, METTL14 as well as DDB2 is down-regulated in human and mouse skin tumors and by chronic UVB irradiation in mouse skin, and METTL14 level is associated with the DDB2 level, suggesting a tumor-suppressive role of METTL14 in UVB-associated skin tumorigenesis in association with DDB2 regulation. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that METTL14 is a target for selective autophagy and acts as a critical epitranscriptomic mechanism to regulate GGR and suppress UVB-induced skin tumorigenesis.

Microarray analysis of genes with differential expression of m6A methylation in lung cancer

Purpose: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is among the most abundant mRNA modifications in eukaryote. The aim of the present study was to investigate function of m6A mRNA methylation in lung cancer and the underlying mechanism.

Methods: Microarray analysis was performed to detect the differences in RNA expression between cancerous and adjacent non-cancerous tissue samples. The target mRNAs were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses. Hierarchical clustering of RNAs was conducted to identify distinct m6A methylation or expression patterns between the samples.

Results: In the present study, some differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of mRNAs were identified, including up-regulated secret phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) and down-regulated pRB. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that while differential hypermethylation was related to cell cycle, intracellular part and protein binding, the main pathway involved herpes simplex virus 1 infection related to down-regulated AKT, Araf1 and BCL2A1. In the meantime, sexual reproduction, cohesin complex and protein C-terminus binding was functionally linked to differential hypomethylation, while fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis were identified as the main pathways related to up-regulated GST and CNP.

Conclusions: We showed that lung cancer development involved differential expression of SPP1 and pRB mRNA, as well as m6A mRNA methylation in AKT, APAF1, BCL2A1, GST and CNP genes.

Localization of METTL16 at the Nuclear Periphery and the Nucleolus Is Cell Cycle-Specific and METTL16 Interacts with Several Nucleolar Proteins

METTL16 methyltransferase is responsible for the methylation of N⁶-adenosine (m⁶A) in several RNAs. In mouse cells, we showed that the nuclear distribution of METTL16 is cell cycle-specific. In the G1/S phases, METTL16 accumulates to the nucleolus, while in the G2 phase, the level of METTL16 increases in the nucleoplasm. In metaphase and anaphase, there is a very low pool of the METTL16 protein, but in telophase, residual METTL16 appears to be associated with the newly formed nuclear lamina. In A-type lamin-depleted cells, we observed a reduction of METTL16 when compared with the wild-type counterpart. However, METTL16 does not interact with A-type and B-type lamins, but interacts with Lamin B Receptor (LBR) and Lap2α. Additionally, Lap2α depletion caused METTL16 downregulation in the nuclear pool. Furthermore, METTL16 interacted with DDB2, a key protein of the nucleotide excision repair (NER), and also with nucleolar proteins, including TCOF, NOLC1, and UBF1/2, but not fibrillarin. From this view, the METTL16 protein may also regulate the transcription of ribosomal genes because we observed that the high level of m⁶A in 18S rRNA appeared in cells with upregulated METTL16.

RNA methyltransferase METTL16: Targets and function

The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methyltransferase METTL16 is an emerging player in the RNA modification landscape of the human cell. Originally thought to be a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase, it has now been shown to bind and methylate the MAT2A messenger RNA (mRNA) and U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA). It has also been shown to bind the MALAT1 long noncoding RNA and several other RNAs. METTL16's methyltransferase domain contains the Rossmann-like fold of class I methyltransferases and uses S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as the methyl donor. It has an RNA methylation consensus sequence of UACAGARAA (modified A underlined), and structural requirements for its known RNA interactors. In addition to the methyltransferase domain, METTL16 protein has two other RNA binding domains, one of which resides in a vertebrate conserved region, and a putative nuclear localization signal. The role of METTL16 in the cell is still being explored, however evidence suggests it is essential for most cells. This is currently hypothesized to be due to its role in regulating the splicing of MAT2A mRNA in response to cellular SAM levels. However, one of the more pressing questions remaining is what role METTL16's methylation of U6 snRNA plays in splicing and potentially cellular survival. METTL16 also has several other putative coding and noncoding RNA interactors but the definitive methylation status of those RNAs and the role METTL16 plays in their life cycle is yet to be determined. Overall, METTL16 is an intriguing RNA binding protein and methyltransferase whose important functions in the cell are just beginning to be understood. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > RNA Editing and Modification RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA-Protein Complexes.

The Emerging Role of RNA Modifications in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

The correct repair of DNA double-strand breaks is essential for maintaining the stability of the genome, thus ensuring the survival and fitness of any living organism. Indeed, the repair of these lesions is a complicated affair, in which several pathways compete for the DNA ends in a complex balance. Thus, the fine-tuning of the DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice relies on the different regulatory layers that respond to environmental cues. Among those different tiers of regulation, RNA modifications have just emerged as a promising field.

N6-Methyladenosine, DNA Repair, and Genome Stability

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification in mRNAs and non-coding RNAs is a newly identified epitranscriptomic mark. It provides a fine-tuning of gene expression to serve as a cellular response to endogenous and exogenous stimuli. m⁶A is involved in regulating genes in multiple cellular pathways and functions, including circadian rhythm, cell renewal, differentiation, neurogenesis, immunity, among others. Disruption of m⁶A regulation is associated with cancer, obesity, and immune diseases. Recent studies have shown that m⁶A can be induced by oxidative stress and DNA damage to regulate DNA repair. Also, deficiency of the m⁶A eraser, fat mass obesity-associated protein (FTO) can increase cellular sensitivity to genotoxicants. These findings shed light on the novel roles of m⁶A in modulating DNA repair and genome integrity and stability through responding to DNA damage. In this mini-review, we discuss recent progress in the understanding of a unique role of m⁶As in mRNAs, lncRNAs, and microRNAs in DNA damage response and regulation of DNA repair and genome integrity and instability.

METTL16, Methyltransferase-Like Protein 16: Current Insights into Structure and Function

Methyltransferase-like protein 16 (METTL16) is a human RNA methyltransferase that installs m⁶A marks on U6 small nuclear RNA (U6 snRNA) and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthetase pre-mRNA. METTL16 also controls a significant portion of m⁶A epitranscriptome by regulating SAM homeostasis. Multiple molecular structures of the N-terminal methyltransferase domain of METTL16, including apo forms and complexes with S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) or RNA, provided the structural basis of METTL16 interaction with the coenzyme and substrates, as well as indicated autoinhibitory mechanism of the enzyme activity regulation. Very recent structural and functional studies of vertebrate-conserved regions (VCRs) indicated their crucial role in the interaction with U6 snRNA. METTL16 remains an object of intense studies, as it has been associated with numerous RNA classes, including mRNA, non-coding RNA, long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), and rRNA. Moreover, the interaction between METTL16 and oncogenic lncRNA MALAT1 indicates the existence of METTL16 features specifically recognizing RNA triple helices. Overall, the number of known human m⁶A methyltransferases has grown from one to five during the last five years. METTL16, CAPAM, and two rRNA methyltransferases, METTL5/TRMT112 and ZCCHC4, have joined the well-known METTL3/METTL14. This work summarizes current knowledge about METTL16 in the landscape of human m⁶A RNA methyltransferases.

Context-Dependent Roles of RNA Modifications in Stress Responses and Diseases

RNA modifications are diverse post-transcriptional modifications that regulate RNA metabolism and gene expression. RNA modifications, and the writers, erasers, and readers that catalyze these modifications, serve as important signaling machineries in cellular stress responses and disease pathogenesis. In response to stress, RNA modifications are mobilized to activate or inhibit the signaling pathways that combat stresses, including oxidative stress, hypoxia, therapeutic stress, metabolic stress, heat shock, DNA damage, and ER stress. The role of RNA modifications in response to these cellular stressors is context- and cell-type-dependent. Due to their pervasive roles in cell biology, RNA modifications have been implicated in the pathogenesis of different diseases, including cancer, neurologic and developmental disorders and diseases, and metabolic diseases. In this review, we aim to summarize the roles of RNA modifications in molecular and cellular stress responses and diseases.

The SC-35 Splicing Factor Interacts with RNA Pol II and A-Type Lamin Depletion Weakens This Interaction

The essential components of splicing are the splicing factors accumulated in nuclear speckles; thus, we studied how DNA damaging agents and A-type lamin depletion affect the properties of these regions, positive on the SC-35 protein. We observed that inhibitor of PARP (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase), and more pronouncedly inhibitors of RNA polymerases, caused DNA damage and increased the SC-35 protein level. Interestingly, nuclear blebs, induced by PARP inhibitor and observed in A-type lamin-depleted or senescent cells, were positive on both the SC-35 protein and another component of the spliceosome, SRRM2. In the interphase cell nuclei, SC-35 interacted with the phosphorylated form of RNAP II, which was A-type lamin-dependent. In mitotic cells, especially in telophase, the SC-35 protein formed a well-visible ring in the cytoplasmic fraction and colocalized with β-catenin, associated with the plasma membrane. The antibody against the SRRM2 protein showed that nuclear speckles are already established in the cytoplasm of the late telophase and at the stage of early cytokinesis. In addition, we observed the occurrence of splicing factors in the nuclear blebs and micronuclei, which are also sites of both transcription and splicing. This conclusion supports the fact that splicing proceeds transcriptionally. According to our data, this process is A-type lamin-dependent. Lamin depletion also reduces the interaction between SC-35 and β-catenin in mitotic cells.

Emerging roles of RNA modifications in genome integrity

Post-translational modifications of proteins are well-established participants in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, which function in the maintenance of genome integrity. Emerging evidence is starting to reveal the involvement of modifications on RNA in the DDR. RNA modifications are known regulators of gene expression but how and if they participate in DNA repair and genome maintenance has been poorly understood. Here, we review several studies that have now established RNA modifications as key components of DNA damage responses. RNA modifying enzymes and the binding proteins that recognize these modifications localize to and participate in the repair of UV-induced and DNA double-strand break lesions. RNA modifications have a profound effect on DNA-RNA hybrids (R-loops) at DNA damage sites, a structure known to be involved in DNA repair and genome stability. Given the importance of the DDR in suppressing mutations and human diseases such as neurodegeneration, immunodeficiencies, cancer and aging, RNA modification pathways may be involved in human diseases not solely through their roles in gene expression but also by their ability to impact DNA repair and genome stability.

The Distinct Function and Localization of METTL3/METTL14 and METTL16 Enzymes in Cardiomyocytes

It has become evident that epitranscriptome events, mediated by specific enzymes, regulate gene expression and, subsequently, cell differentiation processes. We show that methyltransferase-like proteins METTL3/METTL14 and N⁶-adenosine methylation (m6A) in RNAs are homogeneously distributed in embryonic hearts, and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors valproic acid and Trichostatin A (TSA) up-regulate METTL3/METTL14 proteins. The levels of METTL3 in mouse adult hearts, isolated from male and female animals, were lower in the aorta and pulmonary trunks when compared with atria, but METT14 was up-regulated in the aorta and pulmonary trunk, in comparison with ventriculi. Aging caused METTL3 down-regulation in aorta and atria in male animals. Western blot analysis in differentiated mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), containing 10-30 percent of cardiomyocytes, showed METTL3/METTL14 down-regulation, while the differentiation-induced increased level of METTL16 was observed in both wild type (wt) and HDAC1 depleted (dn) cells. In parallel, experimental differentiation in especially HDAC1 wild type cells was accompanied by depletion of m6A in RNA. Immunofluorescence analysis of individual cells revealed the highest density of METTL3/METTL14 in α-actinin positive cardiomyocytes when compared with the other cells in the culture undergoing differentiation. In both wt and HDAC1 dn cells, the amount of METTL16 was also up-regulated in cardiomyocytes when compared to co-cultivated cells. Together, we showed that distinct anatomical regions of the mouse adult hearts are characterized by different levels of METTL3 and METTL14 proteins, which are changed during aging. Experimental cell differentiation was also accompanied by changes in METTL-like proteins and m6A in RNA; in particular, levels and distribution patterns of METTL3/METTL14 proteins were different from the same parameters studied in the case of the METTL16 protein.

The Role of Small Noncoding RNA in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

DNA damage is a common phenomenon promoted through a variety of exogenous and endogenous factors. The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway involves a wide range of proteins, and as was indicated, small noncoding RNAs (sncRNAs). These are double-strand break-induced RNAs (diRNAs) and DNA damage response small RNA (DDRNA). Moreover, RNA binding proteins (RBPs) and RNA modifications have also been identified to modulate diRNA and DDRNA function in the DDR process. Several theories have been formulated regarding the synthesis and function of these sncRNAs during DNA repair; nevertheless, these pathways’ molecular details remain unclear. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding the mechanisms of diRNA and DDRNA biosynthesis and discuss the role of sncRNAs in maintaining genome stability.

Jack of all trades? The versatility of RNA in DNA double-strand break repair

The mechanisms by which RNA acts in the DNA damage response (DDR), specifically in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), are emerging as multifaceted and complex. Different RNA species, including but not limited to; microRNA (miRNA), long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), RNA:DNA hybrid structures, the recently identified damage-induced lncRNA (dilncRNA), damage-responsive transcripts (DARTs), and DNA damage-dependent small RNAs (DDRNAs), have been shown to play integral roles in the DSB response. The diverse properties of these RNAs, such as sequence, structure, and binding partners, enable them to fulfil a variety of functions in different cellular contexts. Additionally, RNA can be modified post-transcriptionally, a process which is regulated in response to cellular stressors such as DNA damage. Many of these mechanisms are not yet understood and the literature contradictory, reflecting the complexity and expansive nature of the roles of RNA in the DDR. However, it is clear that RNA is pivotal in ensuring the maintenance of genome integrity. In this review, we will discuss and summarise recent evidence which highlights the roles of these various RNAs in preserving genomic integrity, with a particular focus on the emerging role of RNA in the DSB repair response.

N6-methyladenosine RNA modification in cancer therapeutic resistance: Current status and perspectives

Several strategies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have improved therapeutic outcomes among cancer patients in clinical practice. However, due to their heterogeneity, cancer cells frequently display primary or acquired therapeutic resistance, thereby resulting in treatment failure. The mechanisms underlying cancer therapeutic resistance are complex and varied. Among them, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification has gained increasing attention as a potential determinant of therapy resistance within various cancers. In this review, we primarily describe evidence for the effect of the m6A epitranscriptome on RNA homeostasis modulation, which has been shown to alter multiple cellular pathways in cancer research and treatment. Additionally, we discuss the profiles and biological implications of m6A RNA methylation, which is undergoing intensive investigation for its effect on the control of therapeutic resistance.