Permeability of Gemcitabine and PBPK Modeling to Assess Oral Administration

The Role of "Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model (PBPK)" New Approach Methodology (NAM) in Pharmaceuticals and Environmental Chemical Risk Assessment

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are mechanistic tools generally employed in the pharmaceutical industry and environmental health risk assessment. These models are recognized by regulatory authorities for predicting organ concentration-time profiles, pharmacokinetics and daily intake dose of xenobiotics. The extension of PBPK models to capture sensitive populations such as pediatric, geriatric, pregnant females, fetus, etc., and diseased populations such as those with renal impairment, liver cirrhosis, etc., is a must. However, the current modelling practices and existing models are not mature enough to confidently predict the risk in these populations. A multidisciplinary collaboration between clinicians, experimental and modeler scientist is vital to improve the physiology and calculation of biochemical parameters for integrating knowledge and refining existing PBPK models. Specific PBPK covering compartments such as cerebrospinal fluid and the hippocampus are required to gain mechanistic understanding about xenobiotic disposition in these sub-parts. The PBPK model assists in building quantitative adverse outcome pathways (qAOPs) for several endpoints such as developmental neurotoxicity (DNT), hepatotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Machine learning algorithms can predict physicochemical parameters required to develop in silico models where experimental data are unavailable. Integrating machine learning with PBPK carries the potential to revolutionize the field of drug discovery and development and environmental risk. Overall, this review tried to summarize the recent developments in the in-silico models, building of qAOPs and use of machine learning for improving existing models, along with a regulatory perspective. This review can act as a guide for toxicologists who wish to build their careers in kinetic modeling.

Prediction of Drug Synergism between Peptides and Antineoplastic Drugs Paclitaxel, 5-Fluorouracil, and Doxorubicin Using In Silico Approaches

Chemotherapy is the main treatment for most early-stage cancers; nevertheless, its efficacy is usually limited by drug resistance, toxicity, and tumor heterogeneity. Cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are small peptide sequences that can be used to increase the delivery rate of chemotherapeutic drugs to the tumor site, therefore contributing to overcoming these problems and enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy. The drug combination is another promising strategy to overcome the aforementioned problems since the combined drugs can synergize through interconnected biological processes and target different pathways simultaneously. Here, we hypothesized that different peptides (P1-P4) could be used to enhance the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents into three different cancer cells (HT-29, MCF-7, and PC-3). In silico studies were performed to simulate the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of each peptide and antineoplastic agent to help predict synergistic interactions in vitro. These simulations predicted peptides P2-P4 to have higher bioavailability and lower T_max, as well as the chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to have enhanced permeability properties over other antineoplastic agents, with P3 having prominent accumulation in the colon. In vitro studies were then performed to evaluate the combination of each peptide with the chemotherapeutic agents as well as to assess the nature of drug interactions through the quantification of the Combination Index (CI). Our findings in MCF-7 and PC-3 cancer cells demonstrated that the combination of these peptides with paclitaxel (PTX) and doxorubicin (DOXO), respectively, is not advantageous over a single treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent. In the case of HT-29 colorectal cancer cells, the combination of P2-P4 with 5-FU resulted in synergistic cytotoxic effects, as predicted by the in silico simulations. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that these CPP6-conjugates can be used as adjuvant agents to increase the delivery of 5-FU into HT-29 colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, these results support the use of in silico approaches for the prediction of the interaction between drugs in combination therapy for cancer.