Loss of Circadian Timing Disrupts Theta Episodes during Object Exploration

Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia

We tested the hypothesis that a temporary period of circadian arrhythmia would transiently impair recall of an aversive memory in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Unlike mice or rats, circadian arrhythmia is easily induced in this species by a one-time manipulation of their ambient lighting [i.e., the disruptive phase shift (DPS) protocol]. Hamsters were conditioned to associate footshocks with a shock chamber (context) and with a predictive auditory tone (cue), and then exposed to the DPS protocol. Following DPS, animals either became arrhythmic (ARR), reentrained to the light-dark cycle (ENT), or became arrhythmic for < 14 days before their circadian locomotor rhythms spontaneously recovered and reentrained (ARR-ENT). Tests for contextual memory showed that freezing was decreased 9–10 days post-DPS when both ARR and ARR-ENT groups were arrhythmic. Once ARR-ENT animals reentrained (day 41), however, freezing was elevated back to Pre-DPS levels and did not differ from those observed in ENT hamsters. ENT animals maintained high levels of freezing at both time points, whereas, freezing remained low in ARR hamsters. In contrast to contextual responses, cued responses were unaffected by circadian arrhythmia; all three groups exhibited elevated levels of freezing in response to the tones. The differential impact of circadian arrhythmia on contextual versus cued associative memory suggests that arrhythmia preferentially impacts memory processes that depend on the hippocampus.

Suppression of Circadian Timing and Its Impact on the Hippocampus

In this article, I describe the development of the disruptive phase shift (DPS) protocol and its utility for studying how circadian dysfunction impacts memory processing in the hippocampus. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the Siberian hamster is a labile circadian pacemaker that is easily rendered arrhythmic (ARR) by a simple manipulation of ambient lighting. The DPS protocol uses room lighting to administer a phase-advancing signal followed by a phase-delaying signal within one circadian cycle to suppress clock gene rhythms in the SCN. The main advantage of this model for inducing arrhythmia is that the DPS protocol is non-invasive; circadian rhythms are eliminated while leaving the animals neurologically and genetically intact. In the area of learning and memory, DPS arrhythmia produces much different results than arrhythmia by surgical ablation of the SCN. As I show, SCN ablation has little to no effect on memory. By contrast, DPS hamsters have an intact, but arrhythmic, SCN which produces severe deficits in memory tasks that are accompanied by fragmentation of electroencephalographic theta oscillations, increased synaptic inhibition in hippocampal circuits, and diminished responsiveness to cholinergic signaling in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. The studies reviewed here show that DPS hamsters are a promising model for translational studies of adult onset circadian dysfunction in humans.

Resilience in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: Implications for aging and Alzheimer's disease

Many believe that the circadian impairments associated with aging and Alzheimer's disease are, simply enough, a byproduct of tissue degeneration within the central pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). However, the findings that have accumulated to date examining the SCNs obtained postmortem from the brains of older individuals, or those diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease upon autopsy, suggest only limited atrophy. We review this literature as well as a complementary one concerning fetal-donor SCN transplant, which established that many circadian timekeeping functions can be maintained with rudimentary (structurally limited) representations of the SCN. Together, these corpora of data suggest that the SCN is a resilient brain region that cannot be directly (or solely) implicated in the behavioral manifestations of circadian disorganization often witnessed during aging as well as early and late progression of Alzheimer's disease. We complete our review by suggesting future directions of research that may bridge this conceptual divide and briefly discuss the implications of it for improving health outcomes in later adulthood.