Safety and Local Efficacy of Laser Ablation for the Extrahepatic Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Available Treatment Strategy

Treatment outcomes after radiofrequency ablation in patients with non-B non-C hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: comparison with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for patients with non-B non-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (NBNC-HCC) within Milan criteria, as well as to compare them with those of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC (HBV-HCC).

METHODS

From January 2007 to February 2020, 303 patients with primary HCC who underwent RFA were retrospectively reviewed, including 259 patients with HBV-HCC (HBV-HCC group) and 44 patients with NBNC-HCC (NBNC-HCC group). The clinical characteristics and treatment survivals were evaluated and compared. Moreover, the propensity score matching was used to reduce selection bias.

RESULTS

A significantly lower proportion of cirrhosis was observed in the NBNC-HCC group (p = .048). Before propensity score matching, local tumor progression, disease-free survival, and overall survival after RFA showed no significant differences between the two groups (all p > .05). After matching, the overall survival rates in the NBNC-HCC group were significantly better than those in the HBV-HCC group (p = .042). Moreover, for patients with NBNC-HCC, tumor size (hazard ratio = 8.749, 95% confidence interval, 1.599-47.849; p = .012) was the only independent predictor of local tumor progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NBNC-HCC within the Milan criteria after RFA had better long-term survival than patients with HBV-HCC, although larger, prospective and multicenter trials are required to validate these results.

Treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis

Extrahepatic metastasis (EHM) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increasingly been seen due to improved survival with effective management of intrahepatic lesions. The presence of EHM indicates an advanced stage of HCC, for which systemic therapy serves as the standard treatment modality. Since the approval of Sorafenib as the first systemic agent in 2007, it took almost a decade to show its efficacy in both first and further lines of setting until the landscape of systemic drugs was finally expanded. Moreover, with inspiring results from immunotherapy trials in HCC, it appears that the introduction of immunotherapy may lead to an evolution in the portfolio of HCC treatment. Although the locoregional approach in the management of EHM is not recommended for advanced-stage HCC, efforts have been made to demonstrate its efficacy in symptom relief and potential benefit for overall survival. This review provides a summary of recent updates of the systemic agents in the treatment of advanced HCC, with an emphasis on aggressive locoregional management of EHM by various treatment modalities.