Improvement of EGFR Testing over the Last Decade and Impact of Delaying TKI Initiation

Real-world outcomes associated with afatinib use in patients with solid tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions

OBJECTIVES

Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions may drive oncogenesis via constitutive activation of ErbB signaling. Hence, NRG1 fusion-driven tumors may be susceptible to ErbB-targeted therapy. Afatinib (irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) has demonstrated activity in individual patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors. This study collected real-world data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter, non-comparative cohort study, physicians in the US-based Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network collected data from medical records of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors who received afatinib (afatinib cohort) or other systemic therapies (non-afatinib cohort) in any therapy line. Objectives included demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes (overall response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]).

RESULTS

Patients (N = 110) with a variety of solid tumor types were included; 72 received afatinib, 38 other therapies. In the afatinib cohort, 70.8 % of patients received afatinib as second-line treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 2-4 in 69.4 % at baseline. In the non-afatinib cohort, 94.7 % of patients received systemic therapy as first-line treatment and ECOG PS was 2-4 in 31.6 % at baseline. In the afatinib cohort, ORR was 37.5 % overall (43.8 % when received as first-line therapy); median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 7.2 months, respectively. In the non-afatinib cohort, ORR was 76.3 %; median PFS and OS were 12.9 and 22.6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world data on the characteristics of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors treated with afatinib or other therapies; durable responses were observed in both groups. However, there were imbalances between the cohorts, and the study was not designed to compare outcomes. Further prospective/retrospective trials are required.

Use of Structured Template and Reporting Tool for Real-World Evidence for Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Reporting of Real-World Evidence Studies: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Real-world evidence (RWE) studies are increasingly being used to support healthcare decisions. Various frameworks, tools, and checklists exist for ensuring quality of real-world data, designing robust studies, and assessing potential for bias. In January 2021, Structured Template and Reporting Tool for RWE (STaRT-RWE) was released to further reduce ambiguity, assumptions, and misinterpretation while planning, implementing, and reporting RWE studies of the safety and effectiveness of treatments. The objective of this study was to identify gaps in the reporting quality of published RWE studies by using this template for critical appraisal.

METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a keyword search on PubMed for free-full-text research articles using real-world data, RWE design, and safety with or without effectiveness outcomes of a medicinal product or intervention in humans of any age or gender, published in English between January 13, 2021, and January 13, 2022. Assessment of risk of bias was done using Assessment of Real-World Observational Studies critical appraisal tool. Deficiencies in methods and findings as per STaRT-RWE template were reported as frequencies.

RESULTS

A total of 54 of 2374 retrieved studies were included in the review. Based on the STaRT-RWE template, the studies inadequately reported empirically defined covariates, power and sample size calculation, attrition, sensitivity analyses, index date (day 0) defining criterion, predefined covariates, outcome, metadata about data source and software, objective, inclusion and exclusion criteria, analysis specifications, and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of STaRT-RWE template along with its tables, design diagram, and library of published studies has a potential of improving robustness of RWE studies.

Usage of epidermal growth factor mutation testing and impact on treatment patterns in non-small cell lung cancer: An international observational study

OBJECTIVES

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This real-world study explored treatment patterns and time to receive EGFRm test results in patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC.

METHODS

A cross-sectional medical chart review was completed May-August 2020 in Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC and a positive EGFRm test result January-December 2017. Data were abstracted from NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up (31 March 2020) or patient's death whichever occurred earlier. The index date was the date of EGFRm confirmation.

RESULTS

223 physicians provided data for 1,793 patients. Patients' mean age was 64.7 years, 54 % were male, 30.7 % had no history of smoking. Overall, 78 % of EGFRm test results were received ≤ 2 weeks after request (range of median 7-14 days across countries). Median time from advanced NSCLC diagnosis to EGFRm test result was 18 days (median range 10-22 days across countries). Over a third (37 %) of patients received a systemic treatment prior to EGFRm result; chemotherapy (25 %) and EGFR-TKI (15 %) were most commonly prescribed; post-EGFR test-result was EGFR-TKI (68 %); 80 % of patients initiated EGFR-TKI at any time point post-NSCLC diagnosis. Of those receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI post-EGFRm testing, 84 % received a TKI alone, 12 % in combination with chemotherapy, and 3 % with other treatments. Median time from first-line EGFR-TKI initiation post-EGFRm testing to first subsequent treatment was 19.8 months.

CONCLUSION

Over one-fifth of patients wait >14 days for their EGFRm test results, affecting their likelihood of receiving first-line EGFR-TKI with 20 % of patients never receiving EGFR TKI treatment. There was significant inter-country variability in the proportion of patients receiving EGFR TKIs. Our study highlights the need to improve EGFRm testing turnaround times and treatment initiation across countries.

Disparate Time-to-Treatment and Varied Incidence of Actionable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Molecular Alterations in British Columbia: A Historical Cohort Study

Background: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) outcomes remain suboptimal for early-stage disease despite emerging advances in systemic therapy for the peri-operative period. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identifies driver mutations for which targeted therapies have been developed that improve survival. The BC lung cancer screening program, which was initiated in May 2022, is expected to identify people with early and late stages of NSCLC. It is crucial to first understand the molecular epidemiology and patterns of time to initiate treatment across its five health authorities (HA) to optimize the delivery of care for NSCLC in BC. In this way, we may harness the benefits of targeted therapy for more people with NSCLC as novel advances in therapy continue to emerge. Objective: to compare (a) the frequency of actionable NSCLC molecular alterations among HAs and (b) the time to treatment initiation. Methods: a retrospective observational study was conducted with prospectively collected data from the BC CGL Database. Adults with late stage NSCLC who underwent targeted NGS were included for the time period from May 2020 to June 2021. Demographics, actionable molecular alterations, PDL-1 expression, and time to treatment across HAs were examined. Using appropriate statistical tests for comparison among HAs, p>0.05 was deemed significant. Results: 582 patients underwent NGS/IHC and analysis during the study period. The mean age was 71 (10.1), and 326 (56%) patients were female. A significantly higher proportion of all EGFRm+ were identified within Vancouver Coastal Health (VCHA) and Fraser Health Authority (FHA) compared to the other health authorities (p < 0.001). This also holds true for common sensitizing EGFRm+ alone (p < 0.001) and for sensitizing EGFRm+ when adjusted for females and smoker status (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62, 0.92; p = 0.005). Patients residing within the Northern, Interior, and Island HAs were less likely to receive treatment at the same rate as those in VCHA and FHA HAs. Conclusion: actionable NSCLC driver mutations are present in all regional HAs, with disparity noted in time to initiate treatment between HAs. This provides evidence for the importance of molecular testing for patients in all BC HAs to guide personalized and timely NSCLC treatment.

The storm of NGS in NSCLC diagnostic-therapeutic pathway: How to sun the real clinical practice

The increasing number of approved drugs along with next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies look out as potential revolution of biomolecular characterization of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, several aspects impact on success rate of NGS in clinical practice: a multidisciplinary approach and thorough knowledge of strengths and limits of each technologic diagnostic tool are required. Crucial preliminary step is the selection of the best available sample before testing, aware of clinical condition and setting of disease. Genomic data should be than integrated in the clinical context and matched with available therapeutic options; Molecular Tumor Boards (MTB) are worldwide emerging interdisciplinary groups implemented to transfer the impact of precision medicine in clinical practice. In order to guarantee equity in treatment, these considerations should find their application widely and rapidly. Aim of this review is offering an overview of emerging biomarkers, relative upcoming targeted drugs, and new diagnostic chances with an authors' perspective about a real-life diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm useful for daily clinical practice.

Contribution of the IdyllaTM System to Improving the Therapeutic Care of Patients with NSCLC through Early Screening of EGFR Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotyping, a critical examen for the treatment decisions of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is commonly assayed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), but this global approach takes time. To determine whether rapid EGFR genotyping tests by the Idylla^TM system guides earlier therapy decisions, EGFR mutations were assayed by both the Idylla^TM system and NGS in 223 patients with NSCLC in a bicentric prospective study. Idylla^TM demonstrated agreement with the NGS method in 187/194 cases (96.4%) and recovered 20 of the 26 (77%) EGFR mutations detected using NGS. Regarding the seven missed EGFR mutations, five were not detected by the Idylla^TM system, one was assayed in a sample with insufficient tumoral cells, and the last was in a sample not validated by the Idylla^TM system (a bone metastasis). Idylla^TM did not detect any false positives. The average time between EGFR genotyping results from Idylla^TM and the NGS method was 9.2 ± 2.2 working days (wd) (12.6 ± 4.0 calendar days (cd)). Subsequently, based on the Idylla^TM method, the timeframe from tumor sampling to the initiation of EGFR-TKI was 7.7 ± 1.2 wd (11.4 ± 3.1 cd), while it was 20.3 ± 6.7 wd (27.2 ± 8.3 cd) with the NGS method (p < 0.001). We thus demonstrated here that the Idylla^TM system contributes to improving the therapeutic care of patients with NSCLC by the early screening of EGFR mutations.