1
|
Zhang Y, Li J. Recent advancements in understanding of biological role of homeobox C9 in human cancers. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:1168-1176. [PMID: 39351453 PMCID: PMC11438841 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Homeobox (HOX) C9, a member of the HOX family, is an important transcription factor, and it plays a significant role in various biological processes. This family of genes is highly valued for their essential roles in establishing and maintaining the body axis during embryonic development and adult tissues. Further, HOXC9 plays a central role in neuronal differentiation, angiogenesis, and adipose distribution, which are essential for the development of the nervous system, maturation of tissues and organs, and maintenance of energy balance and metabolic health. Recent research has found that abnormal HOXC9 expression is closely associated with the development and progression of various tumor types. The HOXC9 expression level can be an indicator of tumor prognosis. Therefore, elucidating the association between HOXC9 expression and its regulatory mechanisms and tumorigenesis can provide novel insights on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Lianyungang Oriental Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang 222042, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Lianyungang Oriental Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang 222042, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soeung V, Puchalski RB, Noebels JL. The complex molecular epileptogenesis landscape of glioblastoma. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101691. [PMID: 39168100 PMCID: PMC11384957 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
The cortical microenvironment surrounding malignant glioblastoma is a source of depolarizing crosstalk favoring hyperexcitability, tumor expansion, and immune evasion. Neosynaptogenesis, excess glutamate, and altered intrinsic membrane currents contribute to excitability dyshomeostasis, yet only half of the cases develop seizures, suggesting that tumor and host genomics, along with location, rather than mass effect, play a critical role. We analyzed the spatial contours and expression of 358 clinically validated human epilepsy genes in the human glioblastoma transcriptome compared to non-tumor adult and developing cortex datasets. Nearly half, including dosage-sensitive genes whose expression levels are securely linked to monogenic epilepsy, are strikingly enriched and aberrantly regulated at the leading edge, supporting a complex epistatic basis for peritumoral epileptogenesis. Surround hyperexcitability induced by complex patterns of proepileptic gene expression may explain the limited efficacy of narrowly targeted antiseizure medicines and the persistence of epilepsy following tumor resection and clarify why not all brain tumors provoke seizures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Soeung
- Developmental Neurogenetics Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ralph B Puchalski
- Ben and Catherine Ivy Center for Advanced Brain Tumor Treatment, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Noebels
- Developmental Neurogenetics Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Center for Cancer Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalita O, Kazda T, Reguli S, Jancalek R, Fadrus P, Slachta M, Pospisil P, Krska L, Vrbkova J, Hrabalek L, Smrcka M, Lipina R. Effects of Reoperation Timing on Survival among Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicentric Descriptive Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092530. [PMID: 37173996 PMCID: PMC10177480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma inevitably recurs, but no standard regimen has been established for treating this recurrent disease. Several reports claim that reoperative surgery can improve survival, but the effects of reoperation timing on survival have rarely been investigated. We, therefore, evaluated the relationship between reoperation timing and survival in recurrent GBM. A consecutive cohort of unselected patients (real-world data) from three neuro-oncology cancer centers was analyzed (a total of 109 patients). All patients underwent initial maximal safe resection followed by treatment according to the Stupp protocol. Those meeting the following criteria during progression were indicated for reoperation and were further analyzed in this study: (1) The tumor volume increased by >20-30% or a tumor was rediscovered after radiological disappearance; (2) The patient's clinical status was satisfactory (KS ≥ 70% and PS WHO ≤ gr. 2); (3) The tumor was localized without multifocality; (4) The minimum expected tumor volume reduction was above 80%. A univariate Cox regression analysis of postsurgical survival (PSS) revealed a statistically significant effect of reoperation on PSS from a threshold of 16 months after the first surgery. Cox regression models that stratified the Karnofsky score with age adjustment confirmed a statistically significant improvement in PSS for time-to-progression (TTP) thresholds of 22 and 24 months. The patient groups exhibiting the first recurrence at 22 and 24 months had better survival rates than those exhibiting earlier recurrences. For the 22-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.27, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.036. For the 24-month group, the HR was 0.5 with a 95% CI of (0.25, 0.96) and a p-value of 0.039. Patients with the longest survival were also the best candidates for repeated surgery. Later recurrence of glioblastoma was associated with higher survival rates after reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ondrej Kalita
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
- Department of Health Care Science, Faculty of Humanities, T. Bata University in Zlin, Stefanikova 5670, 760 01 Zlín, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stefan Reguli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Jancalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, St. Anne's University Hospital in Brno, Pekarska 664/53, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Fadrus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Slachta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Pospisil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lukas Krska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Vrbkova
- Institute of Molecular and Translate Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Hnevotinska 133/5, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Lumir Hrabalek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Zdravotníků 248/7, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Smrcka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Radim Lipina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hussein D, Alsereihi R, Salwati AAA, Algehani R, Alhowity A, Al-Hejin AM, Schulten HJ, Baeesa S, Bangash M, Alghamdi F, Cross R, Al Zughaibi T, Saka M, Chaudhary A, Abuzenadah A. The anterior gradient homologue 2 (AGR2) co-localises with the glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) in cancer stem cells, and is critical for the survival and drug resistance of recurrent glioblastoma: in situ and in vitro analyses. Cancer Cell Int 2022; 22:387. [PMID: 36482387 PMCID: PMC9730595 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02814-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastomas (GBs) are characterised as one of the most aggressive primary central nervous system tumours (CNSTs). Single-cell sequencing analysis identified the presence of a highly heterogeneous population of cancer stem cells (CSCs). The proteins anterior gradient homologue 2 (AGR2) and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) are known to play critical roles in regulating unfolded protein response (UPR) machinery. The UPR machinery influences cell survival, migration, invasion and drug resistance. Hence, we investigated the role of AGR2 in drug-resistant recurrent glioblastoma cells. METHODS Immunofluorescence, biological assessments and whole exome sequencing analyses were completed under in situ and in vitro conditions. Cells were treated with CNSTs clinical/preclinical drugs taxol, cisplatin, irinotecan, MCK8866, etoposide, and temozolomide, then resistant cells were analysed for the expression of AGR2. AGR2 was repressed using single and double siRNA transfections and combined with either temozolomide or irinotecan. RESULTS Genomic and biological characterisations of the AGR2-expressed Jed66_GB and Jed41_GB recurrent glioblastoma tissues and cell lines showed features consistent with glioblastoma. Immunofluorescence data indicated that AGR2 co-localised with the UPR marker GRP78 in both the tissue and their corresponding primary cell lines. AGR2 and GRP78 were highly expressed in glioblastoma CSCs. Following treatment with the aforementioned drugs, all drug-surviving cells showed high expression of AGR2. Prolonged siRNA repression of a particular region in AGR2 exon 2 reduced AGR2 protein expression and led to lower cell densities in both cell lines. Co-treatments using AGR2 exon 2B siRNA in conjunction with temozolomide or irinotecan had partially synergistic effects. The slight reduction of AGR2 expression increased nuclear Caspase-3 activation in both cell lines and caused multinucleation in the Jed66_GB cell line. CONCLUSIONS AGR2 is highly expressed in UPR-active CSCs and drug-resistant GB cells, and its repression leads to apoptosis, via multiple pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deema Hussein
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Reem Alsereihi
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 80203, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,College of Health Sciences, Al-Rayan Colleges, 41411, Madinah AL-Munawarah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulla Ahmed A. Salwati
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Rinad Algehani
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Alazouf Alhowity
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M. Al-Hejin
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 80203, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Hans-Juergen Schulten
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Baeesa
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Bangash
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Division of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad Alghamdi
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Richard Cross
- grid.48815.300000 0001 2153 2936School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Emerging Technologies Research Centre (EMTERC), De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester, LE1 9BH UK
| | - Torki Al Zughaibi
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamad Saka
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Adeel Chaudhary
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Centre of Innovation for Personalized Medicine, Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| | - Adel Abuzenadah
- grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, 80216, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia ,grid.412125.10000 0001 0619 1117Centre of Innovation for Personalized Medicine, Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589 Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|