Consensus Recommendations for MRD Testing in Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Ontario

MRD in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive ALL: Methodologies and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is integral in the management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This review discusses the current methods used to evaluate MRD as well as the interpretation, significance, and incorporation of MRD in current practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

New molecular technologies have allowed the detection of MRD to levels as low as 10- 6. The most used techniques to evaluate MRD are multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and high-throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS). Each method varies in terms of advantages, disadvantages, and MRD sensitivity. MRD negativity after induction treatment and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important prognostic marker that has consistently been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. Blinatumomab, a new targeted therapy for Ph + ALL, demonstrates high efficacy in eradicating MRD and improving patient outcomes. In the relapsed/refractory setting, the use of inotuzumab ozogamicin and tisagenlecleucel has shown promise in eradicating MRD. The presence of MRD has become an important predictive measure in Ph + ALL. Current studies evaluate the use of MRD in treatment decisions, especially in expanding therapeutic options for Ph + ALL, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, targeted antibody therapies, chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy, and HCT.

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a haematological malignancy characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of immature lymphoid cells. Over past decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of ALL, resulting in remarkable improvements in its diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Since the advent of chemotherapy, ALL has been the platform to test for innovative approaches applicable to cancer in general. For example, the advent of omics medicine has led to a deeper understanding of the molecular and genetic features that underpin ALL. Innovations in genomic profiling techniques have identified specific genetic alterations and mutations that drive ALL, inspiring new therapies. Targeted agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapies, have shown promising results in subgroups of patients while minimizing adverse effects. Furthermore, the development of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy represents a breakthrough in ALL treatment, resulting in remarkable responses and potential long-term remissions. Advances are not limited to treatment modalities alone. Measurable residual disease monitoring and ex vivo drug response profiling screening have provided earlier detection of disease relapse and identification of exceptional responders, enabling clinicians to adjust treatment strategies for individual patients. Decades of supportive and prophylactic care have improved the management of treatment-related complications, enhancing the quality of life for patients with ALL.

Concordance of Next-Generation Sequencing and Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Methods for Detecting Measurable Residual Disease in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Optimizing Prediction of Clinical Outcomes From a Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION

Detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a vital biomarker in risk prediction and treatment selection. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers greater sensitivity relative to multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) and may be a better predictive tool for identifying ALL patients at risk of relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-center retrospective study compares MRD detection by NGS versus MFC in 52 adult B- and T-ALL patients treated at our institution between 2018 and 2023. Pretreatment bone marrow samples were used for assay calibration, while post-treatment MRD assessment was completed up to 4.5 months after the first complete remission (CR1) using an MRD cutoff of 10-6 for distinguishing relapse risk.

RESULTS

The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) among patients who were MRD positive using MFC and NGS was 39.5% and 46.2%, respectively. Unlike MFC, post-CR1 MRD positivity with NGS significantly predicted CIR (HR = 9.47, P = .028). In patients who were MRD negative by MFC, low levels of MRD detected by NGS distinguished patients at high risk of relapse (HR 10.3, P = .026, 2-year CIR 51.6%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that assessment of post-CR1 MRD using a highly sensitive NGS assay can identify ALL patients undergoing frontline therapy at increased risk of relapse and guide the use of adjuvant therapy.

The effectiveness of blinatumomab in clearing measurable residual disease in pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients detected by next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab improved survival outcomes in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients with measurable residual disease (MRD) <10-4 . However, data on blinatumomab clearing MRD with high sensitivity of 10-6 remain scarce. This study evaluates the effectiveness of blinatumomab in eradicating extremely low level (up to <10-6 ) of MRD, as detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in children with B-ALL.

METHODS

Patients (n = 19) whose MRD was undetectable by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (sensitivity of 10-4 ) but detectable by NGS after chemotherapy and followed by blinatumomab consolidation were included retrospectively.

RESULTS

After one course of blinatumomab, 13/19 patients (68%) successfully achieved NGS-MRD clearance (undetectable). With a median follow-up of 13.3 months, three of patients who were NGS-MRD positive relapsed within 1.8 months, while another three remained complete remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study was the first to demonstrate that blinatumomab could further eradicate MRD after patients achieve MFC-MRD undetectable in B-ALL patients.

Association of Minimal Residual Disease by a Single-Tube 8-Color Flow Cytometric Analysis With Clinical Outcome in Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-World Study Based on 486 Patients

CONTEXT.—

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) measured by molecular and multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) has been proven to be predictive of relapse and survival in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). A universally applicable antibody panel at a low cost but without compromising sensitivity and power of prognosis prediction in adult B-ALL remains unestablished.

OBJECTIVE.—

To report our experience of using a single-tube 8-color MFC panel to measure the MRD status as a prognostic indicator in adult B-ALL patients.

DESIGN.—

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, MRD status, and prognosis of adult B-ALL based on a large real-world cohort of 486 patients during a 10-year period.

RESULTS.—

MRD assessed by MFC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for BCR-ABL+ patients showed concordant results in 74.2% of cases. MRD- status by our MFC panel could clearly predict a favorable relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) both at the end of induction and at the end of 1 consolidation course. Patients with continuous MRD- and with at least 1 MRD- result showed a favorable RFS and OS compared with those with at least 1 MRD+ result and continuous MRD+, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The single-tube 8-color MFC panel demonstrated a low cost, decent sensitivity, and comparability with polymerase chain reaction-MRD but an excellent performance in predicting RFS and OS, and thus could potentially be taken as a routine indicator in the evaluation of the treatment response for adult patients with B-ALL.

Multiparameter flow cytometry and ClonoSEQ correlation to evaluate precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia measurable residual disease

Measurable residual disease (MRD) detection for precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has become the standard of care. However, the testing methodology has not been standardized. We aim to correlate COG multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and ClonoSEQ techniques to assess the test characteristics, to study abnormal immunophenotype for B-ALL MRD, and to observe B-ALL clonal evolution and the impact of blinatumomab therapy on MFC testing. MFC and molecular reports were retrieved from electronic medical records and data was reviewed. Included in this study were 74 bone marrow samples collected from 31 B-ALL patients at our institution between January 2021 and March 2022. COG MFC and ClonoSEQ results were concordant in 59/74 samples (80%) with positive concordant results in 12 samples (16%) and negative concordant results in 47 samples (64%). Discordant results were seen in 15/74 samples (20%), with 14 samples (19%) showing ClonoSEQ + /MFC- results and only 1 sample (1%) showing MFC + /ClonoSEQ- result. ClonoSEQ + /MFC- cases had MRD values ranging from 1 to 1400 cells/million nucleated cells with 86% of cases showing MRD values of < 100 cells/million nucleated cells. Newly identified dominant sequences were detected using ClonoSEQ in 2/31 patients (6%) during follow-up. All 14 bone marrow samples from 8 patients, who had gone through blinatumomab immunotherapy, were MRD negative by MFC, but 3 cases were MRD positive by ClonoSEQ. Our results show strong correlation between COG MFC and ClonoSEQ (r = 0.96), and both methods are complementary. Clonal evolution may occur, and blinatumomab immunotherapy may impact MFC B-ALL MRD evaluation.

Management of B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: expert opinion from an Indian panel via Delphi consensus method

Introduction

Currently, there are no guidelines for the management of B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) from an Indian perspective. The diagnostic workup, monitoring, and treatment of B-ALL vary among different physicians and institutes.

Objective

To develop evidence-based practical consensus recommendations for the management of B-ALL in Indian settings.

Methods

Modified Delphi consensus methodology was considered to arrive at a consensus. An expert scientific committee of 15 experts from India constituted the panel. Clinically relevant questions belonging to three major domains were drafted for presentation and discussion: (i) diagnosis and risk assignment; (ii) frontline treatment; and (iii) choice of therapy (optimal vs. real-world practice) in relapsed/refractory (R/R) settings. The questionnaire was shared with the panel members through an online survey platform. The level of consensus was categorized into high (≥ 80%), moderate (60%-79%), and no consensus (< 60%). The process involved 2 rounds of discussion and 3 rounds of Delphi survey. The questions that received near or no consensus were discussed during virtual meetings (Delphi rounds 1 and 2). The final draft of the consensus was emailed to the panel for final review.

Results

Experts recommended morphologic assessment of peripheral blood or bone marrow, flow cytometric immunophenotyping, and conventional cytogenetic analysis in the initial diagnostic workup. Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM)-based protocol is the preferred frontline therapy in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients with B-ALL. BFM/German Multicenter Study Group for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-based regimen is suggested in adult patients with B-ALL. Immunotherapy (blinatumomab or inotuzumab ozogamicin) followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the optimal choice of therapy that would yield the best outcomes if offered in the first salvage in patients with R/R B-ALL. In patients with financial constraints or prior allo-HCT (real-world practice) at first relapse, standard-intensive chemotherapy followed by allo-HCT may be considered. For subsequent relapses, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy or palliative care was suggested as the optimal choice of therapy.

Conclusion

This expert consensus will offer guidance to oncologists/clinicians on the management of B-ALL in Indian settings.

Correlation between a 10-color flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD) analysis and molecular MRD in adult B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an important predictive factor for patient outcome and treatment intensification. Molecular monitoring, particularly with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to measure immunoglobin heavy or kappa chain (Ig) or T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements, offers high sensitivity but accessibility is limited by expertise, cost, and turnaround time. Flow cytometric assays are cheaper and more widely available, and sensitivity is improved with multi-parameter flow cytometry at eight or more colors.

METHODS

We developed a 10-color single tube flow cytometry assay. Samples were subject to bulk ammonium chloride lysis to maximize cell yields with a target of 1 × 10⁶ events. Once normal maturation patterns were established, patient samples were analyzed in parallel to standard molecular monitoring.

RESULTS

Flow cytometry was performed on 114 samples. An informative immunophenotype was identifiable in all 22 patients who had a diagnostic sample. MRD analysis was performed on 87 samples. The median lower limits of detection and quantification were 0.004% (range 0.0005%-0.028%) and 0.01% (range 0.001%-0.07%) respectively. Sixty-five samples had concurrent molecular MRD testing, with good correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001). Results were concordant in 52 samples, and discordant in 13 samples, including one case where impending relapse was detected by flow cytometry but not Ig/TCR qPCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our 10-color flow cytometric MRD assay provided adequate sensitivity and good correlation with molecular assays. This technique offers rapid and affordable testing in B-ALL patients, including cases where a suitable molecular assay cannot be developed or has reduced sensitivity.