1
|
Wang JG, Zhong C, Zhang KC, Chen JB. Imaging classification of prostate cancer with extracapsular extension and its impact on positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1344050. [PMID: 38511144 PMCID: PMC10951392 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1344050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Abstract To explore the impact of different imaging classifications of prostate cancer (PCa) with extracapsular extension (EPE) on positive surgical margins (PSM) after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Methods Clinical data were collected for 114 patients with stage PT3a PCa admitted to Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital from September 2019 to August 2023. Radiologists classified the EPE imaging of PCa into Type I, Type II, and Type III. A chi-square test or t-test was employed to analyze the factors related to PSM. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine the factors associated with PSM. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate the area under the curve and evaluate the diagnostic performance of our model. Clinical decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical net benefit of EPE imaging classification, biopsy grade group (GG), and combined model. Results Among the 114 patients, 58 had PSM, and 56 had negative surgical margins. Multivariate analysis showed that EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were risk factors for PSM after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The areas under the curve for EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were 0.677 and 0.712, respectively. The difference in predicting PSM between EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG was not statistically significant (P>0.05). However, when used in combination, the diagnostic efficiency significantly improved, with an increase in the area under the curve to 0.795 (P<0.05). The clinical decision curve analysis revealed that the clinical net benefit of the combined model was significantly higher than that of EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG. Conclusions EPE imaging classification and biopsy GG were associated with PSM after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and their combination can significantly improve the accuracy of predicting PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jun-Bo Chen
- Department of Radiology, Ningbo Yinzhou No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan B, Zhang L, Wang Y, Dai Z, Pan H, Xie J, Wang H, Xin Z, Wang Y, Duan X, Luo J, Wang L, Liu Z. Value of three-dimensional visualization of preoperative prostatic magnetic resonance imaging based on measurements of anatomical structures in predicting positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1228892. [PMID: 37859989 PMCID: PMC10582708 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1228892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Positive surgical margin (PSM) or apical positive surgical margin (APSM) is an established predictive factor of biochemical recurrence or disease progression in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy. Since there are limited usable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based models, we sought to explore the role of three-dimensional (3D) visualization for preoperative MRI in the prediction of PSM or APSM. Methods From December 2016 to April 2022, 149 consecutive PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were retrospectively selected from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. According to the presence of PSM or APSM, patients were divided into a PSM group (n=41) and a without PSM group (n=108) and into an APSM group (n=33) and a without APSM group (n=116). Twenty-one parameters, including prostate apical shape, PCa distance to the membranous urethra, and pubic angle, were measured on 3D visualization of MRI. The development of the nomogram models was built by the findings of multivariate logistic regression analysis for significant factors. Results To predict the probability of PSM, a longer PCa distance to the membranous urethra (OR=0.136, p=0.019) and the distance from the anterior peritoneum to the anterior border of the coccyx (work space AP, OR=0.240, p=0.030) were independent protective factors, while a type 3 prostate apical shape (OR=8.262, p=0.025) and larger pubic angle 2 (OR=5.303, p=0.029) were identified as independent risk factors. The nomogram model presented an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of PSM of 0.777. In evaluating the incidence of APSM, we found that the distance to the membranous urethra (OR=0.135, p=0.014) was associated with a low risk of APSM, while larger pubic angle 1 (OR=4.666, p=0.043) was connected to a higher risk of APSM. The nomogram model showed that the AUC of APSM was 0.755. Conclusion As 3D visualization for preoperative MRI showed good performance in predicting PSM or APSM, the tool might be potentially valuable, which also needs to be validated by multicenter, large-scale, prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Luxin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Yuchao Wang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhihong Dai
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Heming Pan
- Department of Scientific Research, Dalian Neusoft University of Information, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Jiaxin Xie
- Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, First Clinical School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Zihan Xin
- Department of Clinical Medicine, First Clinical School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Yutong Wang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, First Clinical School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Xu Duan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, First Clinical School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Jiawen Luo
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Liang Wang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Urological Digital Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, the Liaoning Provincial Department of Science and Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Liaoning Engineering Research Center of Integrated Precision Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Urological Cancer, Liaoning Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Prostate Cancer Research, Dalian Science and Technology Bureau, Dalian, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meng S, Gan W, Chen L, Wang N, Liu A. Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01645-2. [PMID: 37277573 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01645-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can be used as a predictive tool of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and Gleason score (GS) upgrading in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the ability of IVIM and clinical characteristics to predict PSMs and GS upgrading. METHODS A total of 106 PCa patients after RP who underwent pelvic mpMRI (multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging) between January 2016 and December 2021 and met the requirements were retrospectively included in our study. IVIM parameters were obtained using GE Functool post-processing software. Logistic regression models were fitted to confirm the predictive risk factor of PSMs and GS upgrading. The area under the curve and fourfold contingency table were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of IVIM and clinical parameters. RESULTS Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that percent of positive cores, apparent diffusion coefficient and molecular diffusion coefficient (D) were independent predictors of PSMs (Odds Ratio (OR) were 6.07, 3.62 and 3.16, respectively), Biopsy GS and pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) were independent predictors of GS upgrading (OR were 0.563 and 7.15, respectively). The fourfold contingency table suggested that combined diagnosis increased the ability of predicting PSMs but had no advantage in predicting GS upgrading except the sensitivity from 57.14 to 91.43%. CONCLUSIONS IVIM showed good performance in predicting PSMs and GS upgrading. Combining IVIM and clinical factors enhanced the performance of predicting PSMs, which may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Meng
- Department of Radiological, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China
| | - Wanting Gan
- Department of Radiological, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China
| | - Lihua Chen
- Department of Radiological, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Radiological, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China
| | - Ailian Liu
- Department of Radiological, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 222 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang S, Ji Y, Ma J, Du P, Cao Y, Yang X, Yu Z, Yang Y. Role of inflammatory factors in prediction of Gleason score and its upgrading in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 12:1079622. [PMID: 36713540 PMCID: PMC9878388 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1079622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the role of inflammatory factors including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting Gleason Score (GS) and Gleason Score upgrading (GSU) in localized prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods The data of 297 patients who underwent prostate biopsy and RP in our center from January 2014 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative clinical characteristics including age, values of tPSA, total prostate volume (TPV), f/t PSA ratio, body mass index (BMI), biopsy GS and inflammatory factors including SII, NLR, lymphocyte to monocyte (LMR), neutrophil ratio (NR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte ratio (LR), mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution (RDW) as well as pathological T (pT) stage were collected and compared according to the grades of RP GS (GS ≤ 6 and GS≥7), respectively. ROC curve analysis was used to confirm the discriminative ability of inflammatory factors including SII, NLR and their combination with tPSA for predicting GS and GSU. By using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, the association between significant inflammatory markers and grades of GS were evaluated. Results Patients enrolled were divided into low (GS ≤ 6) and high (GS≥7) groups by the grades of GS. The median values of clinical factors were 66.08 ± 6.04 years for age, 36.62 ± 23.15 mL for TPV, 26.16 ± 33.59 ng/mL for tPSA and 0.15 ± 0.25 for f/t PSA ratio, 22.34 ± 3.14 kg/m2 for BMI, 15 (5.1%) were pT1, 116 (39.1%) were pT2 and 166 (55.9%) were pT3. According to the student's t test, patients in high GS group had a greater proportion of patients with pT3 (P<0.001), and higher NLR (P=0.04), SII (P=0.037) and tPSA (P=0.015) compared with low GS group, the distribution of age, TPV, f/t PSA ratio, BMI, LMR, NR, PLR, LR, MPV and RDW did not show any significantly statistical differences. The AUC for SII, NLR and tPSA was 0.732 (P=0.007), 0.649 (P=0.045) and 0.711 (P=0.015), with threshold values of 51l.08, 2.3 and 10.31ng/mL, respectively. According to the multivariable logistic regression models, NLR ≥ 2.3 (OR, 2.463; 95% CI, 0.679-10.469, P=0.042), SII ≥ 511.08 (OR, 3.519; 95% CI 0.891-12.488; P=0.003) and tPSA ≥ 10.31 ng/mL (OR, 4.146; 95% CI, 1.12-15.35; P=0.033) were all independent risk factors associated with higher GS. The AUC for combination of SII, NLR with tPSA was 0.758 (P=0.003) and 0.756 (P=0.003), respectively. GSU was observed in a total of 48 patients with GS ≤ 6 (55.17%). Then patients were divided into 2 groups (high and low) according to the threshold value of SII, NLR, tPSA, SII+tPSA and NLR+tPSA, respectively, when the GSU rates were compared with regard to these factors, GSU rate in high level group was significantly higher than that in low level group, P=0.001, 0.044, 0.017, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively. Conclusion High SII, NLR and tPSA were associated with higher GS and higher GSU rate. SII was likely to be a more favorable biomarker for it had the largest AUC area compared with tPSA and NLR; the combination of SII or NLR with tPSA had greater values for predicting GS and GSU compared with NLR, SII or tPSA alone, since the AUC area of combination was much higher. SII, NLR were all useful inflammatory biomarkers for predicting GS and detecting GSU among localized PCa patients with biopsy GS ≤ 6.
Collapse
|
5
|
Radical or Not-So-Radical Prostatectomy: Do Surgical Margins Matter? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010013. [PMID: 35008178 PMCID: PMC8749855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer is the second most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Prostatectomy is a commonly used treatment modality for selected patients. The prostate’s ill-defined borders and its vicinity with vital structures complicate the wide excision of the organ, resulting in positive margins of resection. Neoplastic infiltration of margins of resection in prostatectomy specimens affects patients’ prognosis. The surgical technique and surgeons’ expertise affect the incidence of margin positivity. The location and the extent of positive margins diversify the risk of recurrence, with basal infiltration and multifocal foci of positive margins behaving more aggressively. Pathologists are encouraged to thoroughly report the status of margins of resection, as they provide important information for patients’ prognosis and enable the clinician to decide upon the most appropriate subsequent therapeutic steps. Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men, and prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with at least low risk of progression. The presence of positive margins in the radical prostatectomy specimen is considered an adverse pathologic feature, and may prompt additional therapeutic intervention in the patients. The absence of a distinct capsule around the prostate and intraoperative manipulations that aim to minimize postoperative adverse effects, complicate its wide removal. Proper handling of the specimen during the gross processing is essential for accurate determination of the status of margins or resection. Positive margins, defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in the highlighted-with-ink margin of resection, range from 6–38%. The surgical technique, surgeon’s expertise and tumor (i.e., grade and stage) and patients’ (i.e., BMI) characteristics affect the rate of margin positivity. Extensive or multifocal and nonanterior/nonapical positive margins are linked with higher recurrence rates, especially in organ-confined disease, underscoring the need for treating these patients more aggressively. In summary, detailed description of the status of the margins should be performed in every pathology report to determine patients’ prognosis and the most appropriate therapeutic plan.
Collapse
|