Efficacy of Different Interventions to Reduce Pre- or Perioperative Blood Transfusion Rate in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Reduction of red blood cell transfusion with a patient blood management protocol in urological and visceral surgery: a before-after study

BACKGROUND

Although Patient Blood Management (PBM) is recommended by international guidelines, little evidence of its effectiveness exists in abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of the implementation of a PBM protocol on transfusion incidence and anaemia-related outcomes in major urological and visceral surgery.

METHODS

In this before-after study, a three-pillar PBM protocol was implemented in 2020-2021 in a tertiary care centre, including preoperative correction of iron-deficiency anaemia, intraoperative tranexamic acid administration, and postoperative restrictive transfusion. A historical cohort (2019) was compared to a prospective cohort (2022) after the implementation of the PBM protocol. The primary outcome was the incidence of red blood cell transfusion intraoperatively or within 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Data from 488 patients in the historical cohort were compared to 499 patients in the prospective cohort. Between 2019 and 2022, screening for iron deficiency increased from 13.9% to 69.8% (p < 0.01), tranexamic acid administration increased from 9.5% to 84.6% (p < 0.01), and median haemoglobin concentration before transfusion decreased from 77 g.L-1 to 71 g.L-1 (p = 0.02). The incidence of red blood cell transfusion decreased from 11.5% in 2019 to 6.6% in 2022 (relative risk 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87, p = 0.01). The incidence of haemoglobin concentration lower than 100 g.L-1 at discharge was 24.2% in 2019 and 21.8% in 2022 (p =  0.41). The incidence of medical complications was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a PBM protocol over a two-year period was associated with a reduction of transfusion in major urological and visceral surgery.

Preoperative Identification and Management of Anemia in the Colorectal Surgery Patient

Preoperative anemia is a common finding in patients undergoing colorectal surgery, particularly those with cancer. While often multifactorial, iron deficiency anemia remains the most common cause of anemia in this patient population. Although seemingly innocuous, preoperative anemia is associated with an increased risk of perioperative complications and need for allogenic blood transfusions, both of which may worsen cancer-specific survival. Preoperative correction of anemia and iron deficiency is thus necessary to diminish these risks. Current literature supports preoperative screening for anemia and iron deficiency in patients slated to undergo colorectal surgery for malignancy or for benign conditions with associated patient- or procedure-related risk factors. Accepted treatment regimens include iron supplementation-either oral or intravenous-as well as erythropoietin therapy. Autologous blood transfusion should not be utilized as a treatment for preoperative anemia when there is time to implement other corrective strategies. Additional study is still needed to better standardize preoperative screening and optimize treatment regimens.

Evidence-Based Medicine: Principles and Values as Illustrated by the Case of Patient Blood Management

Evidence-based medicine is considered 1 of the 15 great inventions in medicine. It aims to remove bias in medical decision-making as much as possible through a rigorous process. In this article, the principles of evidence-based medicine are illustrated using the case of patient blood management (PBM). Acute or chronic bleeding, iron deficiency, and renal and oncological diseases may lead to preoperative anemia. To compensate for severe and life-threatening blood loss during surgery, doctors transfuse red blood cells (RBCs). PBM is an approach to take care of patients at risk for anemia, which includes detecting and treating anemia before surgery. Alternative interventions to treat preoperative anemia are the use of iron supplementation with or without erythro-stimulating agents (ESAs). The best available scientific evidence today indicates that preoperative intravenous (IV) or oral iron monotherapy may not be effective to reduce RBC utilization (low-certainty evidence). Preoperative IV iron supplementation in addition to ESAs is probably effective to reduce RBC utilization (moderate-certainty evidence), whereas oral iron supplementation in addition to ESAs may be effective to reduce RBC utilization (low-certainty evidence). The adverse events of preoperative oral/IV iron and/or ESAs and their impact on patient-important outcomes (morbidity, mortality, quality of life) remain unclear (very low-certainty evidence). Since PBM is a patient-centered approach, emphasis on monitoring and evaluation of patient-important outcomes in future research is urgently needed. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of preoperative oral/IV iron monotherapy is unproven, whereas preoperative oral/IV iron in addition to ESAs is extremely cost-ineffective.

The impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on the prognosis of colorectal cancer

Background

There is no consensus on the effect of red blood cell transfusion on colorectal cancer (CRC). This study examined the impact of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on postoperative complications, recurrence, and mortality in patients with CRC.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, 219 CRC patients admitted to Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, and Chongqing University Central Hospital from 2008 to 2019 were divided into transfusion (n = 75) and non-transfusion (n = 144) groups. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the effects of blood transfusion on the severity of postoperative complications in patients with CRC, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression was performed to analyze the effects of blood transfusion on postoperative death and recurrence.

Results

Twenty-two (29.33%) patients in the transfusion group were intermediate or advanced severity of postoperative complications, 31 (41.33%) patients died in the transfusion group, and 55 (73.33%) patients occurred recurrence of the CRC, with the median follow-up time being 24.57(14.50,36.37) months. Our result showed that perioperative red blood cell transfusion was associated with an increased risk of intermediate or advanced severity of postoperative complications in CRC patients [odds ratio (OR) = 3.368, 95% CI, 1.146–9.901]. And perioperative red blood cell transfusion increased the risk of postoperative death [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.747, 95% CI, 1.048–7.205] and recurrence in patients with CRC (HR = 2.168, 95% CI, 1.192–3.943).

Conclusion

Our finding demonstrated that perioperative red blood cell transfusion was associated with severity of complications, recurrence, and death in CRC patients. However, further studies are still needed to confirm the adverse effects of red blood cell transfusions in CRC patients.