1
|
Mata DA, Lee JK, Shanmugam V, Marcus CB, Schrock AB, Williams EA, Ritterhouse LL, Hickman RA, Janovitz T, Patel NR, Kroger BR, Ross JS, Mirza KM, Oxnard GR, Vergilio JA, Elvin JA, Benhamida JK, Decker B, Xu ML. Liquid biopsy-based circulating tumour (ct)DNA analysis of a spectrum of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies yields clinically actionable results. Histopathology 2024; 84:1224-1237. [PMID: 38422618 DOI: 10.1111/his.15168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Liquid biopsy (LBx)-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can facilitate molecular profiling of haematopoietic neoplasms (HNs), particularly when tissue-based NGS is infeasible. METHODS AND RESULTS We studied HN LBx samples tested with FoundationOne Liquid CDx, FoundationOne Liquid, or FoundationACT between July 2016 and March 2022. We identified 271 samples: 89 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), 43 plasma-cell neoplasm (PCN), 41 histiocytoses, 27 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 25 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 22 myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), 14 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), and 10 acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Among 73.4% with detectable pathogenic alterations, median maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) was 16.6%, with AML (36.2%), MDS (19.7%), and MPN (44.5%) having higher MSAFs than DLBCL (3.9%), NHL (8.4%), HL (1.5%), PCN (2.8%), and histiocytoses (1.8%) (P = 0.001). LBx detected characteristic alterations across HNs, including in TP53, KRAS, MYD88, and BTK in NHLs; TP53, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF in PCNs; IGH in DLBCL; TP53, ATM, and PDCD1LG2 in HL; BRAF and MAP2K1 in histiocytoses; TP53, SF3B1, DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1 in MDS; JAK2 in MPNs; and FLT3, IDH2, and NPM1 in AML. Among 24 samples, the positive percent agreement by LBx was 75.7% for variants present in paired buffy coat, marrow, or tissues. Also, 75.0% of pairs exhibited alterations only present on LBx. These were predominantly subclonal (clonal fraction of 3.8%), reflecting the analytical sensitivity of LBx. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate that LBx can detect relevant genomic alterations across HNs, including at low clonal fractions, suggesting a potential clinical utility for identifying residual or emerging therapy-resistant clones that may be undetectable in site-specific tissue biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vignesh Shanmugam
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Erik A Williams
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin R Kroger
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
- Departments of Pathology, Urology, and Medicine (Oncology), State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Kamran M Mirza
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mina L Xu
- Department of Pathology, Yale New-Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bayle A, Belcaid L, Aldea M, Vasseur D, Peyraud F, Nicotra C, Geraud A, Sakkal M, Seknazi L, Cerbone L, Blanc-Durand F, Hadoux J, Mosele F, Tagliamento M, Bernard-Tessier A, Verret B, Smolenschi C, Clodion R, Auger N, Romano PM, Gazzah A, Camus MN, Micol J, Caron O, Hollebecque A, Loriot Y, Besse B, Lacroix L, Rouleau E, Ponce S, Soria JC, Barlesi F, Andre F, Italiano A. Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA sequencing with a large panel: a National Center for Precision Medicine (PRISM) study. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:389-396. [PMID: 36709039 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing is a promising approach for tailoring therapy in patients with cancer. We report hereby the results from a prospective study where we investigated the impact of comprehensive molecular profiling of ctDNA in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Genomic analysis was performed using the FoundationOne Liquid CDx Assay [324 genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability status]. Each individual genomic report was reviewed and discussed weekly by a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB). Actionable targets were classified by ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT) tier leading to molecular-based treatment suggestions wherever it was possible. RESULTS Between December 2020 and November 2021, 1772 patients with metastatic solid tumors underwent molecular profiling. Median time to assay results was 12 days. Results were contributive for 1658 patients (94%). At least one actionable target was detected in 1059 patients (64%) with a total of 1825 actionable alterations including alteration of the DNA damage repair response pathway (n = 336, 18%), high TMB (>16 mutations/Mb; n = 243, 13%), PIK3CA mutations (n = 150, 8%), ERBB family pathway alterations (n = 127, 7%), PTEN alterations (n = 95, 5%), FGFR alterations (n = 67, 4%) and MET activations (n = 13, 0.7%). The MTB recommended a matched therapy for 597 patients (56%) with a total of 819 therapeutic orientations: clinical trials (n = 639, 78%), off-label/compassionate use (n = 81, 10%), approved drug (n = 51, 6%), and early access program (n = 48, 6%). In total, 122 patients (21%) were treated. Among the assessable patients (n = 107), 4 (4%) had complete response, 35 (33%) had partial response, 27 (25%) had stable disease, and 41 (38%) a progressive disease as best response. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-6.7 months) and 8.3 months (95% confidence interval 4.7-11.9 months) respectively. CONCLUSIONS ctDNA sequencing with a large panel is an efficient approach to match patients with advanced cancer with targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bayle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, labeled Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France
| | - L Belcaid
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Aldea
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - D Vasseur
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Peyraud
- Department of Early Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux
| | - C Nicotra
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Geraud
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - M Sakkal
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - L Seknazi
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - L Cerbone
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Blanc-Durand
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - J Hadoux
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Mosele
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - M Tagliamento
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | | | - B Verret
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - C Smolenschi
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - R Clodion
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - N Auger
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - P M Romano
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - A Gazzah
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - M N Camus
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J Micol
- Department of Hematology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - O Caron
- Department of Genetics, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - A Hollebecque
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - Y Loriot
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - B Besse
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - L Lacroix
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - E Rouleau
- Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - S Ponce
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif
| | - J C Soria
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Barlesi
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - F Andre
- Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de médecine, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris; Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
| | - A Italiano
- Drug Development Department (DITEP) Gustave Roussy - Cancer Campus, Villejuif; Department of Early Phase Trial Unit, Institut Bergonié Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Bordeaux; Faculty of Medicine, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pinet S, Durand S, Perani A, Darnaud L, Amadjikpe F, Yon M, Darbas T, Vergnenegre A, Egenod T, Simonneau Y, Le Brun-Ly V, Pestre J, Venat L, Thuillier F, Chaunavel A, Duchesne M, Fermeaux V, Guyot A, Lacorre S, Bessette B, Lalloué F, Durand K, Deluche E. Clinical management of molecular alterations identified by high throughput sequencing in patients with advanced solid tumors in treatment failure: Real-world data from a French hospital. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1104659. [PMID: 36923436 PMCID: PMC10009270 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1104659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In the context of personalized medicine, screening patients to identify targetable molecular alterations is essential for therapeutic decisions such as inclusion in clinical trials, early access to therapies, or compassionate treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the real-world impact of routine incorporation of FoundationOne analysis in cancers with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, or in those progressing after at least one course of standard therapy. Methods A FoundationOneCDx panel for solid tumor or liquid biopsy samples was offered to 204 eligible patients. Results Samples from 150 patients were processed for genomic testing, with a data acquisition success rate of 93%. The analysis identified 2419 gene alterations, with a median of 11 alterations per tumor (range, 0-86). The most common or likely pathogenic variants were on TP53, TERT, PI3KCA, CDKN2A/B, KRAS, CCDN1, FGF19, FGF3, and SMAD4. The median tumor mutation burden was three mutations/Mb (range, 0-117) in 143 patients with available data. Of 150 patients with known or likely pathogenic actionable alterations, 13 (8.6%) received matched targeted therapy. Sixty-nine patients underwent Molecular Tumor Board, which resulted in recommendations in 60 cases. Treatment with genotype-directed therapy had no impact on overall survival (13 months vs. 14 months; p = 0.95; hazard ratio = 1.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-2.26)]. Conclusions This study highlights that an organized center with a Multidisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board and an NGS screening system can obtain satisfactory results comparable with those of large centers for including patients in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Pinet
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Stéphanie Durand
- The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Alexandre Perani
- Cytogenetic, Medical Genetic and Reproductive Biology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Léa Darnaud
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Fifame Amadjikpe
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Mathieu Yon
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Tiffany Darbas
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | | | - Thomas Egenod
- Chest Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | | | - Valérie Le Brun-Ly
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Julia Pestre
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Laurence Venat
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Frédéric Thuillier
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Alain Chaunavel
- The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.,Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Mathilde Duchesne
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.,Research Unit (UR) 20218 - NEURIT "Neuropathies et Innovations Thérapeutiques", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | | | - Anne Guyot
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Sylvain Lacorre
- Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Barbara Bessette
- The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Fabrice Lalloué
- The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Karine Durand
- The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France.,Department of Pathology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Elise Deluche
- Medical Oncology Department, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.,The National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1308 - CAPTuR "Control Of Cell Activation, Tumor Progression and Therapeutic Resistance", Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cahn F, Revon-Riviere G, Min V, Rome A, Filaine P, Pelletier A, Abed S, Gentet JC, Verschuur A, André N. Blood-Derived Liquid Biopsies Using Foundation One ® Liquid CDx for Children and Adolescents with High-Risk Malignancies: A Monocentric Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112774. [PMID: 35681754 PMCID: PMC9179410 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Precision oncology requires tumor molecular profiling to identify actionable targets. Blood-derived liquid biopsy (LB) is a potential alternative that is not yet documented in real-world settings, especially in pediatric oncology. Analyzing, retrospectively, the use of LB in children with refractory relapsing diseases, we were able to show that this is a feasible alternative to tissue biopsy, resulting in successful analysis in a subset of patients. Abstract Precision oncology requires tumor molecular profiling to identify actionable targets. Tumor biopsies are considered as the gold standard, but their indications are limited by the burden of procedures in children. Blood-derived liquid biopsy (LB) is a potential alternative that is not yet documented in real-world settings, especially in pediatric oncology. We performed a retrospective analysis of children and teenagers with a relapsing or refractory disease, upon whom LB was performed using the Foundation One® liquid CDx from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 in a single center. Forty-five patients (27 boys) were included, with a median age of 9 years of age (range: 1.5–17 years old). Underlying malignancies were neuroblastoma (12 patients), bone sarcoma (12), soft tissue sarcoma (9), brain tumors (7), and miscellaneous tumors (5). Forty-three patients had metastatic disease. Six patients had more than one biopsy because of a failure in first LB. Median time to obtain results was 13 days. Overall, analysis was successful for 33/45 patients. Eight patients did not present any molecular abnormalities. Molecular alterations were identified in 25 samples with a mean of 2.1 alterations per sample. The most common alterations concerned TP53 (7 pts), EWS-FLI1 (5), ALK (3), MYC (3), and CREBBP (2). TMB was low in all cases. Six patients received treatment based on the results from LB analysis and all were treated off-trial. Three additional patients were included in early phase clinical trials. Mean duration of treatment was 85 days, with one patient with stable disease after eight months. Molecular profiling using Foundation One® Liquid CDx was feasible in pediatric patients with high-risk solid tumors and lead to identification of targetable mutations in a subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanny Cahn
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Gabriel Revon-Riviere
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
- Centre d’essais Précoces en Cancérologie de Marseille (CEPCM), CLIPP2, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | - Victoria Min
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Angélique Rome
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Pauline Filaine
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
- Centre d’essais Précoces en Cancérologie de Marseille (CEPCM), CLIPP2, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | - Annick Pelletier
- Centre d’essais Précoces en Cancérologie de Marseille (CEPCM), CLIPP2, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France;
| | - Sylvie Abed
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Jean-Claude Gentet
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Arnauld Verschuur
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
| | - Nicolas André
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France; (F.C.); (G.R.-R.); (V.M.); (A.R.); (P.F.); (S.A.); (J.-C.G.); (A.V.)
- Centre d’essais Précoces en Cancérologie de Marseille (CEPCM), CLIPP2, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13005 Marseille, France;
- SMARTc Unit, CRCM Inserm 1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Aix-Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|