Understanding Treatment Patterns and Outcomes among Patients with De Novo Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: A Population-Level Retrospective Analysis from Alberta, Canada

Real-world treatment patterns and quality of life among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma living in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Asia.

METHODS

Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of medical oncologists/urologists and their adult patients in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey. Exploratory patient-reported outcomes included the EQ-5D visual analog scale, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health, and Brief Pain Inventory. Analyses were descriptive.

RESULTS

Overall, 175 physicians reported data for 988 patients. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 66.3 (10.8) years, 77% were men, and 82% had bladder tumors at diagnosis. Of patients receiving first- (n = 988), second- (n = 290), and third-line (n = 87) treatments, 81%, 35%, and 59% received chemotherapy, respectively, and 17%, 63%, and 34% received programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors, respectively. Patient-reported (n = 319) mean (standard deviation) EQ-5D visual analog scale score was 51.8 (15.6), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health status score was 44.6 (19.9), and Brief Pain Inventory score was 6.5 (1.9; n = 315).

CONCLUSION

The most common first- and second-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand inhibitors, respectively. At third line, 10% of patients received best supportive care alone, underscoring an unmet need for effective third-line treatment options. Patients in all regions reported quality-of-life impairment.

Treatment Patterns and Real-World Outcomes for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

There are limited data on real-world outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) since immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. Our objective was to analyze outcomes for patients with mUC since ICIs became available.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with mUC attending the outpatient clinic of a single tertiary care center who received systemic therapy between June 2017 and July 2021 with follow-up up to December 2022. Summary and descriptive statistics were calculated for categorical and continuous variables. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate survival, and a Cox proportional-hazards model was used to explore associations between clinical variables and outcomes.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The median patient age was 68 yr (range 35-90). The first systemic therapy administered was platinum-based in 79% of cases and ICI-based in 21%. Some 61% of the cohort received a second systemic treatment, with 75% of these an ICI. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 24 mo (interquartile range 9-35). Patients on ICI therapy for ≥6 mo had median overall survival of 59 mo (95% confidence interval 39 mo-not reached). Metastatic sites on initiation of ICI therapy and C-reactive protein kinetics were prognostic in patients receiving ICIs. Limitations include the retrospective design and inherent selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

More than 60% of patients with mUC received second-line treatment, and 75% of these received an ICI. Patients staying on immunotherapy for more than 6 mo have substantially better outcomes in comparison to patients with less time on immunotherapy and historical cohorts.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We looked at the lines of therapy and outcomes for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract, starting from when immunotherapy drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became available. We found that 60% of patients have received second-line therapy, which is a double the rate in comparison to historical groups of patients. Patients with long-term ICI therapy (>6 months) had significantly better outcomes, with a median survival of more than 3 years.

The Genomic Landscape of Urothelial Carcinoma with High and Low ERBB2 Expression

BACKGROUND

Recent data suggests that HER2-targeted treatment is efficacious in urothelial carcinoma (UC). We investigated the genomic, transcriptomic, and immune landscapes and clinical outcomes in UC segmented by ERBB2 expression.

METHODS

NextGen DNA/RNA sequencing was performed for 4743 UC tumors. A total of 3% (124/4125) of tumors had HER2 IHC and whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) data. ERRB2-high and -low tumors were defined by ≥75th and <25th percentiles of ERBB2 expression, respectively. PD-L1 (SP142) positive staining was defined as ≥2+ and ≥5%. HER2 (4B5) positive staining was defined as ≥3+ and >10% or 2+ and >10% with positive HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH).

RESULTS

Of the patients who were ERBB2-high, 79% (61/77) were HER2 positive via IHC. Tumors from lower tract UC had higher ERBB2 expression compared to upper tract UC (50 v 40 median TPM (mTPM), p < 0.001). ERBB2 expression was similar between primary and metastatic tumors (47 v 47 mTPM, p = 0.95). ERBB2-high tumors had a higher prevalence of pathogenic mutations in pTERT, ERBB2, and ELF3 versus ERBB2-low tumors, p < 0.001. ERBB2-high tumors had higher expressions of ADC target genes NECTIN4 (12 v 8 mTPM) and TACSTD2 (366 v 74 mTPM) versus ERBB2-low (p < 0.001), as well as better overall survival from time of tissue sampling than ERBB2-low (HR 1.71, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a high concordance between HER2 expression by IHC and ERBB2 gene expression by WTS in UC. Differences in ADC target expression between ERBB2-high vs. ERBB2-low UC may provide a rationale for combination treatment strategies with HER2-ADC. The association between high ERBB2 expression and survival advantage warrants further investigation.

Treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare utilisation and costs in patients with locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer in Denmark 2015-2020

BACKGROUND

Treatment patterns in locally advanced and metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (La/mUBC) is changing, but little is known about current treatment patterns, survival, and costs of these patients. Our aim was to describe treatment patterns, survival, and healthcare utilisation/costs in Danish La/mUBC patients in a routine clinical care setting.

METHODS

Registry-based nationwide cohort study including all bladder cancer patients aged 18 years or older with a La/mUBC tumour in the pathology register and a concomitant bladder cancer diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry in the period 2015-2020. We categorised the patients according to (1) La/mUBC at time of first bladder cancer diagnosis (de novo La/mUBC) and (2) non-invasive or localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer at time of diagnosis which had progressed to La/mUBC. All patients were included at date of pathology-confirmed La/mUBC. Follow-up ended 30 September 2022.

RESULTS

We identified 1278 patients (69% men) with La/mUBC and no other previous cancer. Of these, 212 (17%) had de novo La/mUBC, while 1066 (83%) had progressed to La/mUBC. Median age was 72 years. Patients were followed for a median of 13.0 months (interquartile range 4.7;32.0). During follow-up, 651 (51%) patients started first-line treatment, of these, 285 progressed to second-line treatment, and 112 also started third-line treatment. Median survival was 13.0 months from La/mUBC diagnosis, 12.1 months from start of first-line treatment, 9.8 months from start of second-line treatment, and 8.6 months from start of third-line treatment. The mean number of days admitted to hospital was 3.47, 3.97, and 4.07 per month following initiation of first-line, second-line, and third-line treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with La/mUBC have a poor prognosis, and in routine clinical care only around half of the patients received systemic anti-cancer treatment suggesting an unmet need for novel treatments. The overall costs only increased slightly from first to third-line treatment.

Administration of Enfortumab Vedotin after Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor and the Prognosis in Japanese Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Large Database Study on Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Enfortumab vedotin shows promise as a targeted therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma, particularly in patients who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune-checkpoint inhibitor. The EV-301 phase III trial demonstrated significantly improved overall survival and response rates compared to standard chemotherapy. However, more data, especially from larger real-world studies, are needed to further assess its effectiveness in Japanese patients.

METHODS

A total of 6007 urothelial cancer patients inducted with pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment were analyzed. Among them, 563 patients received enfortumab vedotin after pembrolizumab, while 443 patients received docetaxel or paclitaxel after pembrolizumab, and all were included in the study for efficacy as a life prolonging agent.

RESULTS

The enfortumab vedotin group showed a longer overall survival than the paclitaxel/docetaxel group (p = 0.013, HR: 0.71). In multivariate analysis, enfortumab vedotin induction was the independent risk factor for overall survival (p = 0.013, HR: 0.70). There were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Enfortumab vedotin prolonged the overall survival for Japanese advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients compared to paclitaxel or docetaxel after pembrolizumab treatment.