Stereotactic Radiotherapy after Incomplete Transarterial (Chemo-) Embolization (TAE\TACE) versus Exclusive TAE or TACE for Treatment of Inoperable HCC: A Phase III Trial (NCT02323360)

Treatment of intermediate-to-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is shifting toward a multidisciplinary strategy that includes multiple modalities as needed

In the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology, Han et al compared the efficacy of and adverse reactions to bevacizumab versus lenvatinib as molecularly targeted agents in combination with interventional therapy and immunotherapy (IMT) to treat intermediate-to-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. No significant differences in efficacy or adverse reactions were observed between bevacizumab and lenvatinib. This study is highly promising because in some regions, e.g., Japan, the combination of molecularly targeted therapy with IMT is fixed because of insurance restrictions, and some molecularly targeted agents cannot be combined with IMT. Further studies using these three modalities are expected to be conducted in the future. Additionally, because advanced radiotherapy modalities have recently been established, the number of combinations continues to increase, and further evidence regarding combination therapy, which is the cornerstone of personalized medicine, needs to be accumulated.

Emerging evidence-based role for external-beam radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

The primary curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma are resection or liver transplantation. For patients requiring downstaging or who are unresectable at presentation, the landscape of local treatment options has vastly changed over the past decades. This change is partly due to the paucity of high-level evidence to guide the selection of liver-directed therapies, where physician preference and treatment patterns have historically resulted in relegating external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to a secondary option in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cases where arterially directed therapies or thermal ablations were not possible. However, technology advancements have substantially improved the ability to treat liver malignancies with high doses of radiation therapy and to minimise doses to uninvolved hepatic parenchyma and other nearby organs. These advancements have enabled safe treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with EBRT, with low risk of toxicity. Recent randomised trials support the role of EBRT in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma from early to advanced stages. These trials identified that EBRT improved several key patient-centred outcomes, including overall survival when using stereotactic body radiotherapy and sorafenib compared with sorafenib alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, recurrence-free survival with the use of adjuvant EBRT in select patients after hepatocellular carcinoma resection, and quality of life for patients with painful hepatocellular carcinoma masses treated with palliative EBRT. With emerging high-quality evidence, hepatocellular carcinoma therapeutic guidelines should include the growing role of EBRT in improving the quality and quantity of life for patients with liver cancer.

Gastrointestinal side effects in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization: a meta-analysis of 81 studies and 9495 patients

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining targeted chemotherapy and embolization. While effective, TACE can be associated with significant gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, impacting a patient's quality of life.

Objectives

Quantify the prevalence of key GI complications (diarrhea, nausea, GI toxicity, abdominal pain) following TACE.

Design

Systematic review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on studies that reported side effects of TACE. Studies not involving cTACE or drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), non-HCC studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and inaccessible publications were excluded.

Data sources and methods

A PubMed search for clinical and randomized trials was conducted. Extracted data included study identifiers, demographics, TACE details, and GI side effect prevalences. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed study quality and bias.

Results

The analysis included data from 81 studies with 121 individual study arms and 9495 patients. Diarrhea was reported in 38 studies, with a mean prevalence of 23.46% (2.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.39-28.544) and a weighted prevalence of 23.5%. Nausea was most frequently reported, mentioned in 67 studies, with a mean prevalence of 34.66% (2.4; 95% CI: 29.89-39.44) and a weighted prevalence of 32.5%. Abdominal pain was reported in 59 studies, with the highest mean prevalence of 48.07% (2.9; 95% CI: 42.20-53.93) and a weighted prevalence of 46.1%. GI toxicity was reported in 32 studies, with a mean prevalence of 8.85% (1.4; 95% CI: 5.99-11.70) and a weighted prevalence of 9.9%. DEB-TACE generally led to slightly higher rates of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and GI toxicity compared to conventional TACE. The type of chemotherapy agent influenced prevalence of GI-side effects, with high prevalences observed for agents such as zinostatin and cisplatin.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis synthesizes current evidence on managing GI side effects in TACE. Standardizing reporting and developing effective management strategies are crucial to improving patient outcomes.

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of external-beam radiation versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

External-beam radiation (EBRT) is a noninvasive therapeutic alternative to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials to assess the clinical efficacy of EBRT versus TACE for HCC as either a definitive monotherapy or as a bridge to transplantation/surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to include prospective randomized trials comparing EBRT versus TACE. Data was analyzed with random and fixed-effects models. The inconsistency index (I2) was chosen to assess heterogeneity. Three publications were included with a total of 142 patients. Outcomes included local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and occurrences of grade ≥3 toxicity. Comparisons are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

There were three randomized trials that met inclusion criteria. The EBRT was delivered in three to 15 fractions with a total dose between 30 and 75 gray(Gy). EBRT was associated with significantly improved LC (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.08-0.34; I2 = 0%) and PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.60; I2, 0%) compared with TACE. There was no significant difference between EBRT and TACE in OS (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.51-1.22; I2 = 0%) or grade ≥3 toxicity (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.31-2.37; I2 = 57%). None of the analyses had statistically significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TACE, EBRT yields superior LC and PFS without providing a survival benefit in early and intermediate stage HCC. Additional larger prospective randomized controlled trials should be conducted to further investigate differences in clinical outcomes amongst patients with more advanced disease.

External Beam Radiation therapy After Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Treatment of Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with those of TACE combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multicenter randomized study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2017 to 2022, 74 HCC patients with tumors confined to the liver without vascular invasion were treated with either TACE only (TACE group, 39 patients) or TACE combined with EBRT (TACE + EBRT group, 35 patients). The primary outcome measured was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control, and the assessment of treatment-related toxicity.

RESULTS

Due to slow accrual, the trial was closed prematurely after enrolling 74 patients. All patients received 2 cycles of TACE before randomization. The TACE and TACE + EBRT groups showed comparable patient and tumor characteristics. The TACE group underwent a median of 3 TACE cycles, and the TACE + EBRT group received 2 cycles of TACE, and a median of 5500 cGy in 15 fractions. For the TACE group, the median local control (LC) duration was 13.1 months, whereas for the TACE + EBRT group, the median LC was not achieved (P < .001). The PFS was recorded at 11.6 months in the TACE group compared with 15.4 months in the TACE + EBRT group (P = .072). The median OS reached 36.8 months for the TACE group and extended to 47.1 months for the TACE + EBRT group (P = .654). The incidence of toxicity was comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of patients enrolled in this clinical trial did not meet expectations. TACE combined with EBRT was shown to be more effective than TACE alone in improving LC without increasing toxicity, whereas PFS and OS were slightly improved. TACE + EBRT can be used as a standard treatment option for patients with inoperable but confined intrahepatic HCC.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy alone versus stereotactic body radiotherapy after incomplete transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

We investigated the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone versus SBRT after incomplete transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for a single recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 5 cm.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent SBRT for a single recurrent HCC ≤5 cm, without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis. Patients were divided into the SBRT-alone group and the TACE-SBRT group. The primary outcome was the local control (LC) rate, and secondary outcomes were survivals and treatment-related toxicities. We additionally conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 477 patients were available for analysis. Among them, 54 patients received SBRT without prior treatment to the target lesion (SBRT-alone group), whereas 423 patients received SBRT for viable HCC after TACE (TACE-SBRT group). The 3-year LC rates did not differ between the two groups (SBRT-alone group, 88.6% vs. TACE-SBRT group, 89.6%, P = 0.918). The 3-year rates of overall survival, out-of-field intrahepatic recurrence-free survival and recurrence-free survival were also not significantly different (P = 0.479, 0.290 and 0.273, respectively). Even after PSM, LC and survival rates at 3 years were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

SBRT alone demonstrated comparable local control and survival outcomes to SBRT following incomplete TACE. SBRT alone may be considered an alternative treatment option for a single recurrent HCC smaller than 5 cm when curative treatments or TACE are not feasible.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities

Objective

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a therapeutic option in the guidelines for liver primaries after standard strategies like surgery or thermoablation have failed. To assess its efficacy and safety, we reviewed all patients treated by SBRT for a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over a six-year period.

Methods and materials

The study included all patients treated by SBRT for HCC between April 2015 and November 2021 in the University Cancer Institute at Toulouse-Oncopole. All patients were inoperable and not eligible for thermoablation, or after a failure. All tumor sizes were included and cirrhosis up to Child-Pugh B was accepted. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment response was assessed using mRECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded using CTCAE (v4.0).

Results

One hundred and nine patients with 118 lesions were treated. Half underwent prior standard treatment. Median dose was 50 Grays in five fractions for most patients. Chronic liver disease represented 90.8 % of cases with a median age of 69 years. Median tumor size was 4.0 cm. Median follow-up was 22.2 months [95 %CI: 15.1-30.4]. LC, OS and PFS at two years were 82.4 % [95 %CI: 71.3; 89.5], 73.2 % [95 %CI: 61.5; 81.8] and 35.8 % [95 %CI: 25.1; 46.7], respectively. Acute toxicities occurred in 20.2 % of patients, including 10.1 % grade 3-4 and 1.8 % grade 5. Late toxicities occurred in 5.5 % of patients including 4.6 % grade 3-4. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was related to digestive perforation or liver failure.

Conclusion

SBRT provides good LC with an acceptable safety profile. It can be used in several settings such as salvage therapy or in combination with validated treatment. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate SBRT as a standard alternative.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which provides excellent local control (LC) and prolongs overall survival (OS). However, in current guidelines, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been proposed as a key treatment option for patients with early- and intermediate-stage HCC, whereas SBRT is not. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies using the propensity score (PS) to compare the outcomes of SBRT and TACE for HCC in a balanced manner. We systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials and studies comparing SBRT and TACE using PS analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and LC were pooled. The heterogeneity between the data collected from these studies was also assessed. SBRT led to a comparable OS (HR: 0.83; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.52-1.34; p = 0.44) to TACE, and significantly improved LC (HR: 0.25; 95 % CI: 0.09-0.67; p = 0.006). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the HR of OS and LC. Although there was no significant difference in the rate of grade 3 or higher toxicities between TACE and SBRT, or between studies, liver toxicity was identified as a common adverse event associated with both SBRT and TACE. Compared to TACE, SBRT showed a comparable OS and improved LC without serious toxicity. Therefore, SBRT should be considered an effective treatment option for various stages of HCC, depending on the tumor factors and pretreatment liver function.

Synchronized Contrast-Enhanced 4DCT Simulation for Target Volume Delineation in Abdominal SBRT

Background/Objectives: To present the technical aspects of contrast-enhanced 4DCT (ce4DCT) simulation for abdominal SBRT. Methods: Twenty-two patients underwent two sequential 4DCT scans: one baseline and one contrast-enhanced with personalized delay time (tdelay) calculated to capture the tumor in the desired contrast phase, based on diagnostic triple-phase CT. The internal target volume (ITV) was delineated on ten contrast phases, and a panel of three experts qualitatively evaluated tumor visibility. Aortic HU values were measured to refine the tdelay for subsequent patients. The commonly used approach of combining triple-phase CT with unenhanced 4DCT was simulated, and differences in target delineation were evaluated by volume, centroid shift, Dice and Jaccard indices, and mean distance agreement (MDA). The margins required to account for motion were calculated. Results: The ce4DCT acquisitions substantially improved tumor visibility over the entire breathing cycle in 20 patients, according to the experts' unanimous evaluation. The median contrast peak time was 54.5 s, and the washout plateau was observed at 70.3 s, with mean peak and plateau HU values of 292 ± 59 and 169 ± 25. The volumes from the commonly used procedure (ITV2) were significantly smaller than the ce4DCT volumes (ITV1) (p = 0.045). The median centroid shift was 4.7 mm. The ITV1-ITV2 overlap was 69% (Dice index), 53% (Jaccard index), and 2.89 mm (MDA), with the liver volumes showing significantly lower indices compared to the pancreatic volumes (p ≤ 0.011). The margins required to better encompass ITV1 were highly variable, with mean values ≥ 4 mm in all directions except for the left-right axis. Conclusions: The ce4DCT simulation was feasible, resulting in optimal tumor enhancement with minimal resource investment, while significantly mitigating uncertainties in SBRT planning by addressing poor visibility and respiratory motion. Triple-phase 3DCT with unenhanced 4DCT led to high variability in target delineation, making the isotropic margins ineffective.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Several locoregional therapies (LRTs) for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are available; however, a global comparison of the relative efficacy of each is needed.

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analytic comparison of all identified randomized clinical trials evaluating the treatment of nonmetastatic HCC.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search of PubMed and the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meetings from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2023, was performed.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials using a form of LRT (surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, radiofrequency ablation [RFA], microwave ablation [MWA], radiotherapy [RT], hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC], transarterial bland embolization [TAE], transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], or transarterial radioembolization [TARE]).

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Study eligibility and data extraction were each reviewed by 2 authors independently. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compare treatment categories.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome; overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome.

Results

Forty randomized clinical trials reporting on comparative outcomes of 11 576 total patients with localized HCC treated with LRT were included. The median follow-up was 30.0 (IQR, 18.5-40.8) months. Direct pooled comparisons between treatment classes suggested improved outcomes for surgery combined with adjuvant therapy over surgery alone (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.51-0.75]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48-0.78]; P < .001), surgery over RFA (PFS: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; P = .02), RT over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.60]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.13-0.97]; P = .04), and HAIC over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.72]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.75]; P < .001). No substantial heterogeneity was noted for any pairwise comparison with the exception of RT-based regimens compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analysis suggest that all LRTs are not equivalent for the treatment of localized HCC. The efficacy of LRTs appears hierarchical, with surgery-based management outcomes associated with the best treatment outcomes and embolization-based treatment options associated with the worst treatment outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of more than a decade treating patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose/Objectives

To evaluate if stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a durable effect on tumor control and can be delivered safely.

Materials/Methods

Patients included in this retrospective study have been treated at our institution from January 2008 to December 2022. Eligibility criteria were diagnosis of HCC, BCLC stage 0-A-B, non-cirrhotic liver or liver with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class A, and a maximum of three lesions with a cumulative diameter of ≤ 6 cm. Patients with relapses after surgery, thermal ablation or TACE or patients awaiting transplant were also candidates for SBRT. SBRT was delivered in 6 fractions of 8 or 9 Gy. The primary endpoint was local (target) control (LC). Secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity.

Results

A total of 52 patients received SBRT at our institution and 51 were included in this study. One patient objected and was excluded. Median follow-up was 2.1 years for LC and 2.3 years for OS. Median tumor size was 26 mm. LC rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 100 %, 95 % and 95 % respectively. Median TTP was 45.6 months. Median OS was 7.1 years. RR was 96 %. No patients in this study have experienced SBRT related CTC AE grade ≥ 3 toxicity.

Conclusion

SBRT resulted in excellent long-term local control rates and absence of severe toxicity in a group of HCC patients. The reported outcomes compare favorably with other local therapies. SBRT should be considered as one of the available local treatment options for HCC.

A Review of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the Management of Gastrointestinal Malignancies

ABSTRACT

In this review, we explore the role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and other advanced radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies, which primarily involves primary and secondary liver cancers and pancreatic cancers. The review examines radiotherapy in both curative and palliative settings, emphasizing the evolution of SBRT and hypofractionation as alternatives to conventional radiotherapy. We review the recent literature evaluating radiotherapy in the management of unresectable, borderline resectable, and metastatic pancreatic cancer, highlighting recent advances in radiotherapy techniques that aim to improve local control, reduce toxicity, and increase resectability in appropriate patients. For primary liver cancers (hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma), SBRT has emerged as a potential noninvasive alternative to surgery, particularly in patients with unresectable tumors or those awaiting liver transplantation. The review also provides insights into ongoing clinical trials, comparative studies between SBRT and other local therapies such as radiofrequency ablation, and the use of radiotherapy in managing liver metastases from various primary cancers. Throughout, we emphasize limitations in the available literature and highlight areas of ongoing and future investigation.

Recent update of proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Although access to proton beam therapy (PBT) is limited worldwide, its use for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is gradually increasing with the expansion of new facilities. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to investigate the updated evidence of PBT for HCC.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that enrolled patients with liver-confined HCC that were treated with PBT for a cure up to February 2024.

RESULTS

A total of 1,858 HCC patients receiving PBT from 22 studies between 2004 and 2023 were selected for this meta-analysis. The median proportion of Child-Pugh class A was 86% (range, 41-100), and the median tumor size was 3.6 cm (range, 1.2-9.0). The median total dose ranged from 55 GyE to 76 GyE (median, 69). The pooled rates of 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival after PBT were 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85-91) and 86% (95% CI, 82-90), respectively. The pooled 3- and 5-year overall rates were 60% (95% CI, 54-66) and 46% (95% CI, 38-54), respectively. The pooled rates of grade 3 hepatic toxicity, classic radiationinduced liver disease (RILD), and non-classic RILD were 1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports PBT for HCC and demonstrates favorable long-term survival and low hepatic toxicities compared with other published studies on other radiotherapy modalities. However, further studies are needed to identify the subgroups that will benefit from PBT.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular cancer-a narrative review and expert opinion

Background and Objective

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a highly conformal technique of external beam radiotherapy precisely delivering high total (ablative) doses in a small number of fractions to clearly defined target volumes. Its development enabled efficient and safe radiation treatments in patients with localized hepatocellular cancer (HCC) unsuitable for other local treatment options. Moreover, it can be easily combined with several other therapy approaches. Thus, the aim of this narrative review is to outline the current role of SBRT in the multifocal treatment of HCC patients.

Methods

We searched PubMed for articles dealing with SBRT alone, in combination with other local or systemic treatments or in comparison to other local treatments in patients with HCC. This included original articles, reviews and conceptional articles dealing with the technique of SBRT. All articles were analysed for suitability by two independent reviewers.

Key Content and Findings

This review summarizes the currently available evidence for SBRT as a definitive treatment for HCC as well as its role within combination approaches including bridging to transplantation. SBRT is an effective and safe definitive treatment option in patients with localized HCC unsuitable for surgery and/or other local therapies based on retrospective and prospective series. Its combination with other local treatments yields superior results compared to single modality treatment based on non-randomized data. A growing number of prospective trials confirmed at least similar if not superior rates of local control with low toxicities compared to well established other local treatments even in non-selected patients.

Conclusions

SBRT is a promising tool in the treatment of HCC. It can be used either as definitive treatment, within combination approaches or as a bridging tool. Several phase III trials comparing SBRT with other local options are ongoing, which will further clarify its encouraging role.

Initial Trans-Arterial Chemo-Embolisation (TACE) Is Associated with Similar Survival Outcomes as Compared to Upfront Percutaneous Ablation Allowing for Follow-Up Treatment in Those with Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3 cm: Results of a Real-World Propensity-Matched Multi-Centre Australian Cohort Study

Percutaneous ablation is recommended in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A patients with HCC ≤3 cm as a curative treatment modality alongside surgical resection and liver transplantation. However, trans-arterial chemo-embolisation (TACE) is commonly used in the real-world as an initial treatment in patients with single small HCC in contrast to widely accepted clinical practice guidelines which typically describe TACE as a treatment for intermediate-stage HCC. We performed this real-world propensity-matched multi-centre cohort study in patients with single HCC ≤ 3 cm to assess for differences in survival outcomes between those undergoing initial TACE and those receiving upfront ablation. Patients with a new diagnosis of BCLC 0/A HCC with a single tumour ≤3 cm first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 who received initial TACE or ablation were included in the study. A total of 348 patients were included in the study, with 147 patients receiving initial TACE and 201 patients undergoing upfront ablation. After propensity score matching using key covariates, 230 patients were available for analysis with 115 in each group. There were no significant differences in overall survival (log-rank test p = 0.652) or liver-related survival (log-rank test p = 0.495) over a median follow-up of 43 months. While rates of CR were superior after ablation compared to TACE as a first treatment (74% vs. 56%, p < 0.004), there was no significant difference in CR rates when allowing for further subsequent treatments (86% vs. 80% p = 0.219). In those who achieved CR, recurrence-free survival and local recurrence-free survival were similar (log rank test p = 0.355 and p = 0.390, respectively). Our study provides valuable real-world evidence that TACE when offered with appropriate follow-up treatment is a reasonable initial management strategy in very early/early-stage HCC, with similar survival outcomes as compared to those managed with upfront ablation. Further work is needed to better define the role for TACE in BCLC 0/A HCC.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant.

Managing hepatocellular carcinoma across the stages: efficacy and outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy : A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) poses a unique challenge due to its predilection for developing on compromised livers, often limiting surgical options. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising local treatment modality for HCC. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of SBRT in HCC patients not suitable for surgery, focusing on local control, optimal radiation dosing, and prognostic factors.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 52 HCC patients treated with SBRT were examined. The study assessed local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) while conducting dosimetric analyses. The relationship between mean liver dose and Child-Pugh score (CPS) progression was also explored.

RESULTS

SBRT demonstrated 93.4% freedom from local progression (FFLP) at 12 months. Notably, a near minimum dose (D98%) below 61 Gy as an equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions with α/β 10 Gy (EQD2α/β10) was associated with reduced FFLP (p-value 0.034). Logistic regression analysis revealed a dose-response relationship for FFLP and D98% with 95% and 98% probability of FFLP at a dose of 56.9 and 73.1 Gy, respectively. The study observed OS rates of 63.7% at 1 year and 34.3% at 3 years. Patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and larger tumors (≥ 37 cm3) experienced decreased PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis identified PVTT, larger tumor volume, and performance status as independent predictors of reduced OS. Notably, classical radiation-induced disease (cRILD) was absent, but nonclassical (nc) RILD occurred in 7.7% of patients. Regression analysis linked a mean EQD2α/β3-8 dose to the liver (12.8-12.6) with a 10% likelihood of ncRILD.

CONCLUSION

SBRT offers a compelling option for achieving high local control and promising survival outcomes in HCC. The study supports a radiation dose range of 61-73.1 Gy, coupled with a mean liver dose under 12.6-12.8 Gy as EQD2, to achieve favorable FFLP rates, with acceptable toxicity rates.

Do We Have a Winner? Advocating for SBRT in HCC Management

•Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective locoregional therapy for inoperable patients with HCC.•SBRT compares favorably with other local therapies in terms of local control, survival, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness.•SBRT should be considered and discussed in multidisciplinary management of appropriate HCC patients.•Advances in SBRT and novel combinations with systemic therapy may further widen the therapeutic index in HCC.

SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know

This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.

New Insights on Liver-Directed Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been increasing over the past decades, but improvements in systemic and locoregional therapies is increasing survival. Current locoregional treatment options include ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). There is ongoing research regarding the combination of systemic and local therapies to maximize treatment effect as well as in new non-invasive, image-guided techniques such as histotripsy. There is also active research in optimizing the delivery of therapy to tumors via nanostructures and viral-vector-mediated gene therapies. In many cases, patients require a combination of therapies to achieve tumor control and prolong survival. This article provides an overview of the most common liver-directed therapies for HCC as well as insight into more recent advances in personalized medicine and emerging techniques.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the current evidence on the utility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (ESHCC) patients not amenable to standard curative treatment options.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Comparative studies reporting oncologic outcomes were included in the review.

RESULTS

Five studies (one phase II randomized controlled trial, one prospective cohort, three retrospective studies) compared SBRT versus TACE. Pooled analysis showed an overall survival (OS) benefit after 3 years (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17-2.34, p = 0.005) which persisted in the 5-year data (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.22, p = 0.02) in favor of SBRT. RFS benefit with SBRT was also seen at 3 years (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.11, p = 0.04) which continued after 5 years (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.47-3.75, p = 0.0004). Pooled 2-year local control (LC) favored SBRT over TACE (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.89-4.63, p < 0.00001). Two retrospective studies compared TACE + SBRT versus TACE alone. Pooled analysis showed significantly improved 3-year OS (OR 5.47; 95% CI 2.47-12.11, p < 0.0001) and LC (OR: 21.05; 95% CI 5.01-88.39, p ≤ 0.0001) in favor of the TACE + SBRT group. A phase III study showed significantly improved LC and PFS with SBRT after failed TACE/TAE versus further TACE/TAE.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account the limitations of the included studies, our review suggests significantly improved clinical outcomes in all groups having SBRT as a component of treatment versus TACE alone or further TACE. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further define the role of SBRT and TACE for ESHCC.

Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Sequential Hepatic Artery Embolization Combined with Operation in the Treatment of Recurrent Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Achieved Pathological Complete Response: A Case Report

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence, which encompasses both true recurrence resulting from cancer spread and de novo tumors developing within the same cancer-prone liver, presents a complication in approximately 70% of cases within a 5-year timeframe. The efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma is still unclear. We report a case of recurrent massive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with pathological complete remission was treated by continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sequential transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) combined with secondary operation. One month after resection, the patient recurred (massive type 141mm×76mm). After 4 times of HAIC sequential TAE conversion therapy, the tumor shrank significantly (70mm×29mm), alpha-fetoprotein(AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) levels decreased significantly, residual liver volume[left half liver accounted for 39.85% of standard liver volume(left half liver + right anterior lobe) accounted for 80.17% of standard liver volume] and Indocyanine green 15-minute retention(ICG R15 8.0%) complies with surgical requirement.The second operation was performed, and the tumor was completely resected after hepatic blood flow occlusion Requirement. The postoperative pathological results showed complete remission (PCR) of the tumor, and no recurrence was found during the follow-up of 16 months. In this case, HAIC sequential TAE conversion therapy has good short-term effect on patients with postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, tumor burden is significantly reduced, the second surgery pathology achieves complete remission, safety and tolerance, it is worthy of study and promotion.

Brazilian Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is expected to increase in the coming years, and strategies to mitigate the burden of this disease are needed in different regions. Geographic variations in epidemiology and risk factors, such as viral hepatitis and metabolic disease, pose challenges in adopting programs for early detection programs and management of patients with HCC. Brazil, like other countries, has high economic and social inequality, with heterogeneous access to health care. Viral hepatitis is the main risk factor but there is growing awareness of fatty liver disease. Risk factor monitoring and screening programs are unmet priorities because patients are often diagnosed at later stages. Advances in the management of patients with HCC have been made in recent years, including new tools for selecting patients for liver transplantation, sophisticated surgical techniques, and new systemic agents. High-volume academic centers often achieve favorable results through the adoption and application of established treatments, but this is not a reality in most regions of Brazil, because of disparities in wealth and resources. As HCC management requires a coordinated and multidisciplinary team, the role of local referral centers in decentralizing access to treatments and promoting health education in different regions should be encouraged and supported.

The management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 24th ESMO/World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2022

This article summarises expert discussion on the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which took place during the 24th World Gastrointestinal Cancer Congress (WGICC) in Barcelona, July 2022. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to ensure an optimal diagnosis and staging of HCC, planning of curative and therapeutic options, including surgical, embolisation, ablative strategies, or systemic therapy. Furthermore, in many patients with HCC, underlying liver cirrhosis represents a challenge and influences the therapeutic options.