1
|
Zhang S, Wang J, Lu S, Chaudhry AS, Tarla D, Khanaki H, Raja IH, Shan A. Effects of Sweet and Forge Sorghum Silages Compared to Maize Silage without Additional Grain Supplement on Lactation Performance and Digestibility of Lactating Dairy Cows. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:1702. [PMID: 38891748 PMCID: PMC11171229 DOI: 10.3390/ani14111702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of replacing maize silage (MZS) with high-sugar sorghum silage (HSS) or forage sorghum silage (FSS) without additional grain supplement in the diets of dairy cows on nutrient digestibility, milk composition, nitrogen (N) use, and rumen fermentation. Twenty-four Chinese Holstein cows (545 ± 42.8 kg; 21.41 ± 0.62 kg milk yield; 150 ± 5.6 days in milk) were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments (n = 8 cows/treatment). The cows were fed ad libitum total mixed rations containing (dry matter basis) either 40% MZS (MZS-based diet), 40% HSS (HSS-based diet), or 40% FSS (FSS-based diet). The study lasted for 42 days, with 14 days devoted to adaptation, 21 days to daily feed intake and milk production, and 7 days to the sampling of feed, refusals, feces, urine, and rumen fluid. Milk production was measured twice daily, and digestibility was estimated using the method of acid-insoluble ash. The data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA in SPSS 22.0 according to a completely randomized design. Dietary treatments were used as fixed effects and cows as random effects. The results indicate that MZS and HSS had greater crude protein but less neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), and a lower pH than FSS (p ≤ 0.04). High starch contents in MZS and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) contents in HSS were observed (p < 0.01). While the highest starch intake was observed for the MZS-based diet, the highest WSC intake was noted for the HSS-based diet, and the highest NDF, ADF, ADL intake was observed for the FSS-based diet (p ≤ 0.05). The diets, including MZS and HSS, had greater digestibility than that of FSS (p ≤ 0.03). Feeding MZS- and HSS-based diets increased the yield, fat, and protein content of the milk, as well as feed conversion efficiency (p ≤ 0.03). However, feeding the MZS- and HSS-based diets decreased the contents of milk urea N, urinary urea N, and urinary N excretion more than the FSS-based diet (p ≤ 0.05). The N use efficiency tended to increase relative to diets containing MZS and HSS compared with FSS (p = 0.06 and p = 0.09). Ruminal ammonia-N and pH were lower, but total volatile fatty acids, acetate, and propionate were higher in cows fed the HSS- and MZS-based diets compared to those fed the FSS-based diet (p ≤ 0.03). It appears as though replacing MZS with HSS in the diet of cows without additional grain supplements has no negative influence on feed intake, milk yield, N utilization, or ruminal fermentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujiang Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China;
- Key Laboratory of Livestock and Grass Resources Utilization around Tarim, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas (Co-Construction by Ministries and Provinces), Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
| | - Jiao Wang
- College of Life Sciences and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China;
| | - Shunping Lu
- Key Laboratory of Tarim Animal Husbandry Science and Technology, College of Animal Science and Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China;
- Key Laboratory of Livestock and Grass Resources Utilization around Tarim, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Areas (Co-Construction by Ministries and Provinces), Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
| | - Abdul Shakoor Chaudhry
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;
| | - Divine Tarla
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Dookie College, VIC 3647, Australia; (D.T.); (H.K.)
| | - Hassan Khanaki
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Dookie College, VIC 3647, Australia; (D.T.); (H.K.)
| | - Imtiaz Hussain Raja
- Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan;
| | - Anshan Shan
- Institute of Animal Nutrition, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tavernier E, Gormley IC, Delaby L, McParland S, O'Donovan M, Berry DP. Cow-level factors associated with nitrogen utilization in grazing dairy cows using a cross-sectional analysis of a large database. J Dairy Sci 2023; 106:8871-8884. [PMID: 37641366 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2023-23606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Reducing nitrogen pollution while maintaining milk production is a major challenge of dairy production. One of the keys to delivering on this challenge is to improve the efficiency of how dairy cows use nitrogen. Thus, estimating the nitrogen utilization of lactating grazing dairy cows and exploring the association between animal factors and productivity with nitrogen utilization are the first steps to understanding the nitrogen utilization complex in dairy cows. Nitrogen utilization metrics were derived from milk and body weight records from 1,291 grazing dairy cows of multiple breeds and crossbreeds; all cows had sporadic information on nitrogen intake concurrent with information on nitrogen sinks (and other nitrogen sources, such as body tissue mobilization). Several nitrogen utilization metrics were investigated, including nitrogen use efficiency (nitrogen output as products such as milk and meat divided by nitrogen intake) and nitrogen excreted (nitrogen intake less the nitrogen output as products such as milk and meat). In the present study, a primiparous Holstein-Friesian used, on average, 20.6% of the nitrogen it ate, excreting the surplus as feces and urine, representing 402 g of nitrogen per day. Intercow variability existed, with a between-cow standard deviation of 0.0094 for nitrogen use efficiency and 24 g of nitrogen per day for nitrogen excretion. As lactation progressed, nitrogen use efficiency declined and nitrogen excretion increased. Nevertheless, nitrogen use efficiency improved (i.e., decreased) from first to second parity, even though it did not improve from second to third parity or greater. Furthermore, nitrogen excretion continued to increase from first to third parity or greater. Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen excretion were negatively correlated (-0.56 to -0.40), signifying that dairy cows who partition more of the ingested nitrogen into products such as milk and meat, on average, also excrete less nitrogen. Milk urea nitrogen was, at best, weakly correlated with nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen excretion; the correlations were between -0.01 and 0.06. In conclusion, several cow-level factors such as parity, stage of lactation, and breed were associated with the range of different nitrogen efficiency metrics investigated; moreover, even after accounting for such effects, 4.8% to 6.3% of the remaining variation in the nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance metrics were attributable to intercow differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Tavernier
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland; Department of Animal Bioscience, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, P61 P302 Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - I C Gormley
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - L Delaby
- INRAE, Institut Agro, UMR Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France
| | - S McParland
- Department of Animal Bioscience, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, P61 P302 Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - M O'Donovan
- Department of Animal Bioscience, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, P61 P302 Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - D P Berry
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|