Limited Practical Utility of Liquid Biopsy in the Treated Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: A systematic review

Advancements in genetic sequencing techniques along with the identification of specific mutations and structural changes in multiple cancer genes, make it possible to identify circulating tumor cells and cell free nucleic acids as blood-based biomarkers, serving as a liquid biopsy (LB) with great utility for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with neoplasms. This systematic review focuses on the clinical utility of LB in patients with breast cancer (BC). Articles published between 1990 and 2021 were included. Databases searched: Trip Database, WoS, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Clinical Keys. Variables studied: Publication year, country, number of cases, primary study design, LB detection methods, genes found, overall survival, disease-free survival, stage, response to treatment, clinical utility, BC molecular type, systemic treatment and methodological quality of primary studies. Of 2619 articles, 74 were retained representing 12 658 patients, mainly cohort studies (66.2%), the majority were from China (15%) and Japan (12.2%). All primary studies described clinical stage and type of systemic treatment used. Most used biomarker detection method: DNA (52.7%) and type of analysis: quantification of total cfDNA (35.1%). PIK3CA mutation was most frequent (62.9%). Evidence suggests clinically useful applications of BC. Though heterogeneous, publications suggest that LB will constitute part of the standard diagnostic-therapeutic process of BC.

Significant impact of circulating tumour DNA mutations on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients

Mutational analysis of circulating tumour (ct) DNA holds promise as an effective tool to predict the course of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the present study we used targeted next generation sequencing of ctDNA to evaluate the impact of cancer driven mutations on the prognosis of MBC. The study included 59 oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative MBC patients. Sequencing analysis was performed in ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, PTEN, TP53, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and AR. At baseline, patients started receiving either chemotherapy (34%; n = 20) or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy in combination with endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i+ET; 66%; n = 39). Overall, 64.4% (n = 38) of the patients carried at least one pathogenic or likely-pathogenic mutation. Number of ctDNA mutations was significantly linked with worse progression free survival (PFS; p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.007). Furthermore, ctDNA load, defined by the number of mutant ctDNA molecules per mL plasma, significantly correlated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.001). Furthermore, mutational status of ESR1 and TP53 significantly predicted PFS (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). These results emphasizes the clinical value of ctDNA mutational analysis in the management of advanced breast cancer.