1
|
Keigley QJ, Fowler AM, O'Brien SR, Dehdashti F. Molecular Imaging of Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer. Cancer J 2024; 30:142-152. [PMID: 38753748 PMCID: PMC11101139 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Steroid receptors regulate gene expression for many important physiologic functions and pathologic processes. Receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and androgen have been extensively studied in breast cancer, and their expression provides prognostic information as well as targets for therapy. Noninvasive imaging utilizing positron emission tomography and radiolabeled ligands targeting these receptors can provide valuable insight into predicting treatment efficacy, staging whole-body disease burden, and identifying heterogeneity in receptor expression across different metastatic sites. This review provides an overview of steroid receptor imaging with a focus on breast cancer and radioligands for estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quinton J Keigley
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| | | | - Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips EF, Karak PK. Diffuse bilateral 18F-Fluoroestradiol pulmonary uptake in patients with metastatic estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: A case report. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2023; 54:726-731. [PMID: 37620179 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and hormonal therapy is an established treatment for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancers. 18F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) is an emerging radiotracer used to determine hormone status in patients with ER positive breast cancer as FES specifically binds to the alpha subtype of estrogen receptors. As with all radiotracers, FES demonstrates background uptake within various tissues and organs besides the targeted breast cancer and metastatic disease. To date, FES has mostly been shown to demonstrate uptake within the lungs from metastatic disease or in a more focal region after radiation therapy. CASE AND OUTCOMES We present two patients with stage IV ER positive breast cancer who underwent FES positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) scans to evaluate for metastatic disease; both of which demonstrated diffuse bilateral mild-moderate pulmonary uptake. The first patient had a severe lung injury which was improving but still present at the time of her FES PET/CT. The second patient had a remote history of prior right breast radiation therapy for a prior breast cancer as well as emphysema and mild interstitial disease. DISCUSSION To date, FES uptake within the lungs has been shown to be secondary to fibrotic changes secondary to prior radiation therapy and the uptake is localized to a focal region within the lung corresponding to the localized region around the tumor needing radiation therapy. We present two FES PET/CT scans that demonstrate diffuse bilateral mild-moderate uptake. We believe the first patient's bilateral FES uptake was secondary to inflammatory changes from her acute lung injury. Our second patient has a remote history of right breast radiation therapy that would not account for her diffuse lung uptake but does have emphysema and mild interstitial disease which can account for the FES uptake seen in her FES PET/CT. CONCLUSION 18F-Fluoroestradiol is an emerging radiotracer that binds to estrogen receptors and is being used to determine hormone receptor status in women with ER positive breast cancers, which is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. Therefore, it's important to understand where it might demonstrate uptake and why. We highlighted two unique cases of mild-moderate pulmonary uptake of FES to provide further information about FES. Overall, we conclude that diffuse bilateral mild-moderate FES uptake within the lungs is likely secondary to inflammation, interstitial disease, or a combination thereof.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Phillips
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06106, United States.
| | - Prasanta K Karak
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06106, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balma M, Liberini V, Racca M, Laudicella R, Bauckneht M, Buschiazzo A, Nicolotti DG, Peano S, Bianchi A, Albano G, Quartuccio N, Abgral R, Morbelli SD, D'Alessandria C, Terreno E, Huellner MW, Papaleo A, Deandreis D. Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:881551. [PMID: 35492341 PMCID: PMC9039137 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.881551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women, with high morbidity and mortality rates. In breast cancer, the use of novel radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine can improve the accuracy of diagnosis and staging, refine surveillance strategies and accuracy in choosing personalized treatment approaches, including radioligand therapy. Nuclear medicine thus shows great promise for improving the quality of life of breast cancer patients by allowing non-invasive assessment of the diverse and complex biological processes underlying the development of breast cancer and its evolution under therapy. This review aims to describe molecular probes currently in clinical use as well as those under investigation holding great promise for personalized medicine and precision oncology in breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Balma
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
- *Correspondence: Michele Balma
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Manuela Racca
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morpho-Functional Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Matteo Bauckneht
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ambra Buschiazzo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Simona Peano
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Andrea Bianchi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Albano
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Civico di Cristina and Benfratelli Hospitals, Palermo, Italy
| | - Ronan Abgral
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | - Silvia Daniela Morbelli
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Enzo Terreno
- Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular & Preclinical Imaging Centers, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Martin William Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Papaleo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boers J, Loudini N, de Haas RJ, Willemsen ATM, van der Vegt B, de Vries EGE, Hospers GAP, Schröder CP, Glaudemans AWJM, de Vries EFJ. Analyzing the Estrogen Receptor Status of Liver Metastases with [ 18F]-FES-PET in Patients with Breast Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11112019. [PMID: 34829366 PMCID: PMC8617814 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol ([18F]-FES) can visualize estrogen receptor (ER) expression, but it is challenging to determine the ER status of liver metastases, due to high physiological [18F]-FES uptake. We evaluated whether [18F]-FES-PET can be used to determine the ER status of liver metastases, using corresponding liver biopsies as the gold standard. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (n = 23) were included if they had undergone a [18F]-FES-PET, liver metastasis biopsy, CT-scan, and [18F]-FDG-PET. [18F]-FES-PET scans were assessed by visual and quantitative analysis, tracer uptake was correlated with ER expression measured by immunohistochemical staining and the effects of region-of-interest size and background correction were determined. Results: Visual analysis allowed ER assessment of liver metastases with 100% specificity and 18% sensitivity. Quantitative analysis improved the sensitivity. Reduction of the region-of-interest size did not further improve the results, but background correction improved ER assessment, resulting in 83% specificity and 77% sensitivity. Using separate thresholds for ER+ and ER− metastases, positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 75%, respectively, could be obtained, although 30% of metastases remained inconclusive. Conclusion: In the majority of liver metastases, ER status can be determined with [18F]-FES-PET if background correction and separate thresholds are applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorianne Boers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Naila Loudini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Robbert J. de Haas
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Antoon T. M. Willemsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Bert van der Vegt
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Geke A. P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Carolina P. Schröder
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (J.B.); (E.G.E.d.V.); (G.A.P.H.); (C.P.S.)
| | - Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
| | - Erik F. J. de Vries
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, The Netherlands; (N.L.); (A.T.M.W.); (A.W.J.M.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-50-36-13599
| |
Collapse
|