1
|
Engh MA, Teutsch B, Schulze Wenning A, Hadani Y, Almog O, Veres DS, Hegyi P, Erőss B. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound likely does not improve diagnostic adequacy during endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2024; 24:649-660. [PMID: 38714387 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Solid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and carrying risks to the patients. AIM assess the diagnostic adequacy of tissue acquisition using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) compared to conventional EUS. METHODS Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched in November 2023. Studies comparing diagnostic adequacy, accuracy and safety using CEH-EUS versus conventional EUS for tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies, level of evidence using the GRADE approach, Odds Ratios (RR) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. I2 quantified heterogeneity. RESULTS The search identified 3858 records; nine studies (1160 patients) were included. OR for achieving an adequate sample was 1.467 (CI: 0.850-2.533), for randomized trials 0.902 (CI: 0.541-1.505), for non-randomized 2.396 (CI: 0.916-6.264), with significant subgroup difference. OR for diagnostic accuracy was 1.326 (CI: 0.890-1977), for randomized trials 0.997 (CI: 0.593-1.977) and for non-randomized studies 1.928 (CI: 1.096-3.393), significant subgroup difference (p = 0.0467). No differences were observed for technical failures or adverse events. Heterogeneity was low, risk of bias "low" to "some concerns" for most outcomes, mostly moderate for non-randomized studies. CONCLUSION Non-randomized studies indicated differences in favor of contrast-enhanced EUS, randomized studies showed no difference in diagnostic adequacy, accuracy or sensitivity when using CEH-EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Anne Engh
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Brigitta Teutsch
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | | | - Yael Hadani
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Omer Almog
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dániel Sándor Veres
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Translational Pancreatology Research Group, Interdisciplinary Centre of Excellence for Research Development and Innovation University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Bálint Erőss
- Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary; Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gheorghiu MI, Seicean A, Pojoga C, Hagiu C, Seicean R, Sparchez Z. Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:2311-2320. [PMID: 38813054 PMCID: PMC11130571 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i17.2311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can overcome the limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided acquisition by identifying microvessels inside inhomogeneous tumours and improving the characterization of these tumours. Despite the initial enthusiasm that oriented needle sampling under CH-EUS guidance could provide better diagnostic yield in pancreatic solid lesions, further studies did not confirm the supplementary values in cases of tissue acquisition guided by CH-EUS. This review details the knowledge based on the available data on contrast-guided procedures. The indications for CH-EUS tissue acquisition include isoechoic EUS lesions with poor visible delineation where CH-EUS can differentiate the lesion vascularisation from the surrounding parenchyma and also the mural nodules within biliopancreatic cystic lesions, which occur in select cases. Additionally, the roles of CH-EUS-guided therapy in patients whose pancreatic fluid collections or bile ducts that have an echogenic content have indications for drainage, and patients who have nonvisualized vessels that need to be highlighted via Doppler EUS are presented. Another indication is represented if there is a need for an immediate assessment of the post-radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, in which case CH-EUS can be used to reveal the incomplete tumour destruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Ioan Gheorghiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400162, Cluj, Romania
| | - Andrada Seicean
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400162, Cluj, Romania
| | - Cristina Pojoga
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400162, Cluj, Romania
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, International Institute for Advanced Study of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Health, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 400375, Cluj, Romania
| | - Claudia Hagiu
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400162, Cluj, Romania
| | - Radu Seicean
- The First Surgical Clinic, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj Napoca 400006, Cluj, Romania
| | - Zeno Sparchez
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca 400162, Cluj, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Esposto G, Massimiani G, Galasso L, Santini P, Borriello R, Mignini I, Ainora ME, Nicoletti A, Zileri Dal Verme L, Gasbarrini A, Alfieri S, Quero G, Zocco MA. Endoscopic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Fine-Needle Aspiration or Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1658. [PMID: 38730610 PMCID: PMC11083840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) are currently recommended for the pathologic diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions (PSLs). The application of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) could aid the endoscopist during an FNA and/or FNB procedure. CEUS is indeed able to better differentiate the pathologic tissue from the surrounding healthy pancreatic parenchyma and to detect necrotic areas and vessels. OBJECTIVES Our objective was to evaluate if ECEUS could reduce the number of needle passes and side effects and increase the diagnostic efficacy of FNA and/or FNB. METHODS A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to explore if ECEUS-FNA or FNB could increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce the number of needle passes and adverse effects compared to standard EUS-FNA or FNB. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned. RESULTS The proportion of established diagnoses of ECEUS was 90.9% compared to 88.3% of EUS, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14). The diagnosis was made through a single step in 70.9% of ECEUS patients and in 65.3% of EUS patients, without statistical significance (p = 0.24). The incidence of adverse reactions was substantially comparable across both groups (p = 0.89). CONCLUSION ECEUS-FNA and FNB do not appear superior to standard EUS-FNA and FNB for the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Esposto
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Giuseppe Massimiani
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Linda Galasso
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Paolo Santini
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Raffaele Borriello
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Irene Mignini
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Maria Elena Ainora
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Alberto Nicoletti
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (P.S.); (A.N.); (L.Z.D.V.)
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Digestive Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (S.A.); (G.Q.)
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- CEMAD Digestive Disease Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.E.); (L.G.); (R.B.); (I.M.); (M.E.A.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang X, Liu ZM, Zhou X, Yang F, Ma WZ, Sun XZ, Sun SY, Ge N. Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 16:117-125. [PMID: 38577648 PMCID: PMC10989249 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i3.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a means to procure adequate specimens for histological and cytologic analysis. The ideal EUS-FNA should be safe, accurate, and have a high sample adequacy rate and low adverse events rate. In recent years, many guidelines and trials on EUS-FNA have been published. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on the influence of some of the main factors on the diagnostic efficiency of EUS-FNA as well as a rare but serious complication known as needle tract seeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Zi-Ming Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xue Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Wen-Zhuang Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Xin-Zhu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Si-Yu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Nan Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Otsuka Y, Kamata K. A review of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic solid tumors. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2023:10.1007/s10396-023-01346-3. [PMID: 37584780 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-023-01346-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is superior to other imaging modalities in the detection of pancreatic masses, although differentiating the types of pancreatic masses detected on EUS remains challenging. However, the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) using ultrasound contrast agents for this differentiation has been reported. CH-EUS plays a pivotal role in analysis of small lesions that can only be detected with EUS. Recently, CH-EUS was used for staging and/or determining the resectability of pancreatic cancer in several clinical trials. In addition, it is used to estimate the response of pancreatic cancer to chemotherapy and to determine the prognosis in cases of pancreatic cancer and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. It is also postulated that CH-EUS improves the diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB) through complementary diagnoses using CH-EUS and EUS-FNAB, or CH-EUS-guided EUS-FNAB. Thus, CH-EUS has been employed for various qualitative diagnoses, including differentiation of pancreatic masses. Second-generation contrast agents such as Sonazoid are used clinically for ultrasound diagnostic imaging of liver and breast disease. The positioning of CH-EUS with Sonazoid as a test for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumors is an issue for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuo Otsuka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Ken Kamata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, 589-8511, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhou D, Zhang Y, Chen W, Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhou X, Tang Q. Enhanced ultrasound-guided versus non-enhanced ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in tissue cellularity of lung malignancies: a propensity score matched study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022; 12:5056-5067. [PMID: 36330190 PMCID: PMC9622440 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Though ultrasound-guided percutaneous lung needle biopsy (US-PLNB) is a first-line small biopsy method for peripheral lung lesions, quality of cellularity in specimens obtained via US-PLNB is uncertain. This study investigated the accuracy, sensitivity, and cellularity of US-PLNB. It examined the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to improve the effectiveness of US-PLNB. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed all data of patients with subpleural lung lesions who underwent US-PLNB. The cellularity of US-PLNB from malignant lesions included the tumor cell number and proportion. The definition of high-quality cellularity (HQC) was concurrently achieving a tumor cell number ≥400 and a proportion ≥20%. The sensitivity, the actual numbers of tumor cell number/proportion, and the rate of HQC were calculated and compared between the CEUS and non-enhanced US groups after propensity score matching (PSM) with subgroup analyses by lesion size (small lesion ≤30 mm and large lesion >30 mm). RESULTS A total of 345 patients undergoing 345 US-PLNBs were evaluated, with 3.7±1.1 of punctures on average. There were 201 malignant and 144 benign lesions with a mean size of 43.8±24.1 mm. Among the 201 malignant lesions, 124 cases underwent CEUS and 77 underwent non-enhanced US. The quantity of tumor cells, the proportion of tumor cells, and the rate of HQC in 201 cases of US-PLNB from malignant lesions were 2,862.1±2,288.0, 44.6%±24.5%, and 82.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.6% to 87.1%], respectively. The quantity of tumor cells, the proportion of tumor cells, and rate of HQC were significantly higher in the CEUS group than that in the non-enhanced US group, both in the analysis of overall malignant lesions and in large malignant lesions (all P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The US-PLNB has high sensitivity and thereby obtains HQC samples for subpleural lung malignant lesions. The CEUS helps improve the rate of HQC and tissue cellularity of lung malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dazhi Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wuxi Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juhong Jiang
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanbin Chen
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinghua Zhou
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qing Tang
- Department of Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rao B H, Trieu JA, Nair P, Gressel G, Venu M, Venu RP. Artificial intelligence in endoscopy: More than what meets the eye in screening colonoscopy and endosonographic evaluation of pancreatic lesions. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 3:16-30. [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v3.i3.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools have ushered in a new era of innovation in the field of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Despite vast improvements in endoscopic techniques and equipment, diagnostic endoscopy remains heavily operator-dependent, in particular, colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Recent reports have shown that as much as 25% of colonic adenomas may be missed at colonoscopy. This can result in an increased incidence of interval colon cancer. Similarly, EUS has been shown to have high inter-observer variability, overlap in diagnoses with a relatively low specificity for pancreatic lesions. Our understanding of Machine-learning (ML) techniques in AI have evolved over the last decade and its application in AI–based tools for endoscopic detection and diagnosis is being actively investigated at several centers. ML is an aspect of AI that is based on neural networks, and is widely used for image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation which are key functional aspects of AI-related computer aided diagnostic systems. In this review, current status and limitations of ML, specifically for adenoma detection and endosonographic diagnosis of pancreatic lesions, will be summarized from existing literature. This will help to better understand its role as viewed through the prism of real world application in the field of GI endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshavardhan Rao B
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi 682041, Kerala, India
| | - Judy A Trieu
- Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, United States
| | - Priya Nair
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi 682041, Kerala, India
| | - Gilad Gressel
- Center for Cyber Security Systems and Networks, Amrita Vishwavidyapeetham, Kollam 690546, Kerala, India
| | - Mukund Venu
- Internal Medicine - Gastroenterology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, United States
| | - Rama P Venu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi 682041, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Utility of Endoscopic-Ultrasonography-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12030753. [PMID: 35328306 PMCID: PMC8947755 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12030753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic-ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has been widely performed for the definitive diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). As the puncture needles, puncture techniques, and sample processing methods have improved, EUS-TA has shown higher diagnostic yields and safety. Recently, several therapeutic target genomic biomarkers have been clarified in pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC). Although only a small proportion of patients with PDAC can benefit from precision medicine based on gene mutations at present, precision medicine will also be further developed for SPLs as more therapeutic target genomic biomarkers are identified. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques enable the examination of multiple genetic mutations in limited tissue samples. EUS-TA is also useful for NGS and will play a more important role in determining treatment strategies. In this review, we describe the utility of EUS-TA for SPLs.
Collapse
|
9
|
Facciorusso A, Mohan BP, Crinò SF, Ofosu A, Ramai D, Lisotti A, Chandan S, Fusaroli P. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration versus standard fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 15:821-828. [PMID: 33481633 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1880893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES It is still unclear whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) contrast-enhanced fine-needle aspiration (CH-EUS-FNA) determines superior results in comparison to standard EUS-FNA in tissue acquisition of pancreatic masses. Aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of these two techniques. METHODS We searched the PubMed/Medline and Embase database through October 2020 and identified 6 studies, of which 2 randomized controlled trials (recruiting 701 patients). We performed pairwise meta-analysis through a random effects model and expressed data as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 84.6% (95% CI 80.7%-88.6%) with CH-EUS-FNA and 75.3% (67%-83.5%) with EUS-FNA, with evidence of a significant superiority of the former (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.26-2.40; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis confirmed the superiority of CH-EUS-FNA over EUS-FNA only in larger lesions. Pooled diagnostic accuracy was 88.8% (85.6%-91.9%) in CH-EUS-FNA group and 83.6% (79.4%-87.8%) in EUS-FNA group (OR 1.52, 1.01-2.31; p = 0.05). Pooled sample adequacy was 95.1% (91.1%-99.1%) with CH-EUS-FNA and 89.4% (81%-97.8%) with EUS-FNA (OR 2.40, 1.38-4.17; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION CH-EUS-FNA seems to be superior to standard EUS-FNA in patients with pancreatic masses. Further trials are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and HepatologyBrooklyn Hospital Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Lisotti
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Gastroenterology Unit, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE USA
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital of Imola, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) with Image Enhancement. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10110888. [PMID: 33143258 PMCID: PMC7692599 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10110888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful in the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions, lymph nodes, and liver lesions, inadequate sampling may result in an incorrect pathological diagnosis. The accuracy of EUS for the evaluation of pancreatobiliary lesions may be increased by image enhancement technologies, including contrast-enhanced harmonic (CH)-EUS and EUS-elastography. These methods can provide information that complement EUS-FNA for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatobiliary cancer, and can help to identify the EUS-FNA target, reducing the requirement for repeat FNA.
Collapse
|