Early Interim Chemotherapy Response Evaluation by F-18 FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Comparison of Lugano Criteria Versus RECIL and PERCIST as Prognostic Factors in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the criteria of the Lugano, RECIL, and PERCIST for prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 335 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. All patients underwent baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Among them, 252 and 213 patients underwent interim PET/CT (I-PET/CT) and end-of-treatment PET/CT (EoT-PET/CT), respectively. Scans were interpreted by 2 nuclear medicine physicians using Lugano, RECIL, and PERCIST. RECIL and PERCIST were compared with Lugano for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

All 3 response criteria could be used to predict PFS and OS. In I-PET/CT, the concordance index of Lugano in predicting PFS and OS was higher than that of RECIL (both P = 0.043) or PERCIST ( P = 0.008 and P = 0.034, respectively). In EoT-PET/CT, the concordance index of Lugano for predicting PFS and OS was similar to RECIL and not significantly different from PERCIST ( P = 0.597 and P = 0.231, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

For I-PET/CT, using the Lugano criteria is more accurate than RECIL or PERCIST in predicting PFS and OS. However, for EoT-PET/CT, the PERCIST criteria are minimally better.

A retrospective head-to-head comparison of the Lugano classification and PERCIST for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of lymphoma. European guidelines recommend FDG-PET/CT for staging and end of treatment (EOT) response assessment, mid-treatment response assessment is optional. We compared the Lugano classification and PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumours (PERCIST) for FDG-PET/CT response assessment in DLBCL head-to-head.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients with DLBCL who underwent first-line R-CHOP(-like) therapy (2013-2020). Interim and EOT FDG-PET/CT response were reevaluated using the Lugano classification and PERCIST. Response was dichotomized into complete metabolic response (CMR) versus non-CMR (interim and EOT) and responders versus nonresponders (interim only). The cutoff for nonresponse at interim was a Deauville score of 5 (DS5) with the Lugano classification and a partial metabolic response with ≤66% reduction in SULpeak using PERCIST (PERCIST66).

RESULTS

In multivariable Cox regression (N = 170), DS5 at interim, PERCIST66 at interim, non-CMR at EOT with the Lugano classification and non-CMR at EOT with PERCIST were predictive of progression-free survival (PFS). The Lugano classification and PERCIST agreed perfectly at interim and EOT and with 98.4% for the identification of nonresponders at interim. The accuracy for predicting events within 2 years of diagnosis was 84.2% for DS-5 at interim, 87.6% for PERCIST66 at interim, 86% for non-CMR with the Lugano classification at EOT and 83.3% for non-CMR with PERCIST at EOT.

CONCLUSION

The Lugano classification and PERCIST were equally predictive of PFS. Nonresponse at interim and non-CMR at EOT were predictive of poor PFS with comparable accuracy for predicting events within 2 years.