Epicardial Adiposity in Relation to Metabolic Abnormality, Circulating Adipocyte FABP, and Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure

Epicardial adipose tissue in obesity with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance biomarker study

BACKGROUND

Obesity has become a serious public health issue, significantly elevating the risk of various complications. It is a well-established contributor to Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Evaluating HFpEF in obesity is crucial. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) has emerged as a valuable tool for validating prognostic biomarkers and guiding treatment targets. Hence, assessing EAT is of paramount importance. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is acknowledged as the gold standard for analyzing cardiac function and morphology. We hope to use CMR to assess EAT as a bioimaging marker to evaluate HFpEF in obese patients.

AIM

To assess the diagnostic utility of CMR for evaluating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [HFpEF; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥ 50%] by measuring the epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volumes and EAT mass in obese patients.

METHODS

Sixty-two obese patients were divided into two groups for a case-control study based on whether or not they had heart failure with HFpEF. The two groups were defined as HFpEF+ and HFpEF-. LV geometry, global systolic function, EAT volumes and EAT mass of all subjects were obtained using cine magnetic resonance sequences.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients of HFpEF- group and seventeen patients of HFpEF+ group were included. LV mass index (g/m2) of HFpEF+ group was higher than HFpEF- group (P < 0.05). In HFpEF+ group, EAT volumes, EAT volume index, EAT mass, EAT mass index and the ratio of EAT/[left atrial (LA) left-right (LR) diameter] were higher compared to HFpEF- group (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, Higher EAT/LA LR diameter ratio was associated with higher odds ratio of HFpEF.

CONCLUSION

EAT/LA LR diameter ratio is highly associated with HFpEF in obese patients. It is plausible that there may be utility in CMR for assessing obese patients for HFpEF using EAT/LA LR diameter ratio as a diagnostic biomarker. Further prospective studies, are needed to validate these proof-of-concept findings.

HFpEF: New biomarkers and their diagnostic and prognostic value

Heart failure characterized by preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses a substantial challenge to healthcare systems worldwide and the diagnostic algorithms used currently mirror those utilized for reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). This literature review aims to explore the diagnostic and prognostic credibility of numerous emerging biomarkers associated with HFpEF. We conducted a thorough analysis of the available medical literature and selected the biomarkers which yielded the maximum amount of published information. After reviewing the current literature we conclude that there are no biomarkers at present which are superior to natriuretic peptides in terms of diagnosis and prognosis of HFpEF. However biomarkers like Suppression of tumorigenicity2, Galectin3 and microRNAs are promising and can be researched further for future use. Although newer individual biomarkers may not be useful in diagnosing and prognosis of HFpEF, we believe that a specific biomarker profile may be identified in each phenotype,which can be used in future.

Epicardial Fat in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Bad Actor or Just Lying Around?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly recognised to be strongly associated with obesity and abnormalities in fat distribution. Epicardial fat has been associated with abnormal haemodynamics in HFpEF, with potential for direct mechanical effects on the heart causing constriction-like physiology and local myocardial remodelling effects from secretion of inflammatory and profibrotic mediators. However, patients with epicardial fat generally have more systemic and visceral adipose tissue making determination of causality between epicardial fat and HFpEF complex. In this review, we will summarise the evidence for epicardial fat being either directly causal in HFpEF pathogenesis or merely being a correlate of worse systemic inflammatory and generalised adiposity. We will also discuss therapies that directly target epicardial fat and may have potential for treating HFpEF and elucidating the independent role of epicardial fat in its pathogenesis.

Association of free fatty acid binding protein with central aortic stiffness, myocardial dysfunction and preserved ejection fraction heart failure

There is an established link between cardiometabolic abnormality, central arterial stiffness, and preserved ejection fraction heart failure (HFpEF). Adipocyte free fatty acid binding protein (a-FABP) has been shown to signal endothelial dysfunction through fatty acid toxicity, though its role in mediating ventricular-arterial dysfunction remains unclear. We prospectively examined the associations of a-FABP with central arterial pressure using non-invasive applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor) and cardiac structure/function (i.e., tissue Doppler imaging [TDI] and global longitudinal myocardial strain [GLS]) in patients with cardiometabolic (CM) risk (n = 150) and HFpEF (n = 50), with healthy volunteers (n = 49) serving as a control. We observed a graded increase of a-FABP across the healthy controls, CM individuals, and HFpEF groups (all paired p < 0.05). Higher a-FABP was independently associated with higher central systolic and diastolic blood pressures (CSP/CPP), increased arterial augmentation index (Aix), lower early myocardial relaxation velocity (TDI-e'), higher left ventricle (LV) filling (E/TDI-e') and worsened GLS (all p < 0.05). During a median of 3.85 years (interquartile range: 3.68-4.62 years) follow-up, higher a-FABP (cutoff: 24 ng/mL, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 1.001-1.02, p = 0.04) but not brain natriuretic peptide, and higher central hemodynamic indices were related to the incidence of heart failure (HF) in fully adjusted Cox models. Furthermore, a-FABP improved the HF risk classification over central hemodynamic information. We found a mechanistic pathophysiological link between a-FABP, central arterial stiffness, and myocardial dysfunction. In a population with a high metabolic risk, higher a-FABP accompanied by worsened ventricular-arterial coupling may confer more unfavorable outcomes in HFpEF.

Differential Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With a Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction in Diabetes

Diabetes promotes the development of both heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction through diverse mechanisms, which are likely mediated through hyperinsulinemia rather than hyperglycemia. Diabetes promotes nutrient surplus signaling (through Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1) and inhibits nutrient deprivation signaling (through sirtuin-1 and its downstream effectors); this suppresses autophagy and promotes endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby undermining the health of diabetic cardiomyocytes. The hyperinsulinemia of diabetes may also activate sodium-hydrogen exchangers in cardiomyocytes (leading to injury and loss) and in the proximal renal tubules (leading to sodium retention). Diabetes may cause epicardial adipose tissue expansion, and the resulting secretion of proinflammatory adipocytokines onto the adjoining myocardium can lead to coronary microcirculatory dysfunction and myocardial inflammation and fibrosis. Interestingly, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-the only class of antidiabetic medication that reduces serious heart failure events-may act to mitigate each of these mechanisms. SGLT2 inhibitors up-regulate sirtuin-1 and its downstream effectors and autophagic flux, thus explaining the actions of these drugs to reduce oxidative stress, normalize mitochondrial structure and function, and mute proinflammatory pathways in the stressed myocardium. Inhibition of SGLT2 may also lead to a reduction in the activity of sodium-hydrogen exchangers in the kidney (leading to diuresis) and in the heart (attenuating the development of cardiac hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction). Finally, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the mass and mute the adverse biology of epicardial adipose tissue (and reduce the secretion of leptin), thus explaining the capacity of these drugs to mitigate myocardial inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, and fibrosis, and improve ventricular filling dynamics. The pathophysiological mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors may benefit heart failure likely differ depending on ejection fraction, but each represents interference with distinct pathways by which hyperinsulinemia may adversely affect cardiac structure and function.