Neurofilaments as Emerging Biomarkers of Neuroaxonal Damage to Differentiate Behavioral Frontotemporal Dementia from Primary Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review

Plasma neurofilament light chain as prognostic marker of cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, a clinical setting study

BACKGROUND

Analysis of selected research cohorts has highlighted an association between plasma neurofilament light (NfL) protein and cross-sectional cognitive impairment as well as longitudinal cognitive decline. However, the findings have yielded inconsistent results regarding its possible application in clinical practice. Despite its potential prognostic significance, the role of plasma NfL in daily clinical practice with unselected patients suffering from cognitive impairment remains largely unexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional and longitudinal monocentric study enrolled 320 patients with Alzheimer's disease ([AD], n = 158), dementia with Lewy body ([DLB], n = 30), frontotemporal dementia ([FTD], n = 32), non-neurodegenerative diseases ([NND], n = 59) or subjective cognitive decline ([SCD], n = 41). Plasma NfL levels were measured at baseline on the Simoa platform. AD, DLB, and FTD patients were also analyzed altogether as a 'degenerative conditions' subgroup, whereas SCD and NND were grouped as a 'non-degenerative conditions' subgroup. We assessed the relationship between plasma NfL levels and cross-sectional cognitive performance, including global cognition and six specific cognitive domains. A subset of 239 patients had follow-up mini-mental state examinations (MMSE) up to 60 months. Models were adjusted on age, education level, glomerular filtration rate and body mass index.

RESULTS

In 320 patients, baseline plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with global cognition (β=-1.28 (-1.81 ; -0.75) P < 0.001), memory (β=-1.48 (-2.38 ; -0.59), P = 0.001), language (β=-1.72(-2.49 ; -0.95) P < 0.001), praxis (β=-2.02 (-2.91 ; -1.13) P < 0.001) and executive functions (β=-0.81, P < 0.001). Across diagnosis, plasma NfL levels were negatively associated with cross-sectional global cognition in all but the SCD subgroup, specifically with executive functions and memory in AD (respectively β=-0.71(-1.21 ; -0.211), P = 0.005 and β=-1.29 (-2.17 ; -0.42), P = 0.004), and with attention in LBD (β=-0.81(-1.16 ; -0.002), P = 0.03). Linear mixed-effects models showed that plasma NfL predicted MMSE decline in the global population (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.15 (-0.26 ; -0.04), P = 0.006), as in the neurodegenerative condition subgroup (βPlasmaNfLxTime=-0.21 (-0.37 ; - 0.06), P = 0.007), but not in non-neurodegenerative condition subgroup.

CONCLUSION

In our clinical cohort, plasma NfL was associated with faster cognitive decline in neurodegenerative dementia, which corroborates data obtained in research cohorts. Yet, plasma NfL was not predictive of accelerated cognitive decline in individuals without neurodegeneration, suggesting its use as a neurodegeneration-specific predictive biomarker.

Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders - towards clinical application

Neurofilament proteins have been validated as specific body fluid biomarkers of neuro-axonal injury. The advent of highly sensitive analytical platforms that enable reliable quantification of neurofilaments in blood samples and simplify longitudinal follow-up has paved the way for the development of neurofilaments as a biomarker in clinical practice. Potential applications include assessment of disease activity, monitoring of treatment responses, and determining prognosis in many acute and chronic neurological disorders as well as their use as an outcome measure in trials of novel therapies. Progress has now moved the measurement of neurofilaments to the doorstep of routine clinical practice for the evaluation of individuals. In this Review, we first outline current knowledge on the structure and function of neurofilaments. We then discuss analytical and statistical approaches and challenges in determining neurofilament levels in different clinical contexts and assess the implications of neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels in normal ageing and the confounding factors that need to be considered when interpreting NfL measures. In addition, we summarize the current value and potential clinical applications of neurofilaments as a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage in a range of neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, and Parkinson disease. We also consider the steps needed to complete the translation of neurofilaments from the laboratory to the management of neurological diseases in clinical practice.

Psychosis in Neurodegenerative Dementias: A Systematic Comparative Review

Background

Psychosis, characterized by delusions and/or hallucinations, is frequently observed during the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative dementias (ND) (i.e., dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD)) and cause diagnostic and management difficulties.

Objective

This review aims at presenting a concise and up-to-date overview of psychotic symptoms that occur in patients with ND with a comparative approach.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. 98 original studies investigating psychosis phenotypes in neurodegenerative dementias were identified (40 cohort studies, 57 case reports).

Results

Psychosis is a frequently observed phenomenon during the course of ND, with reported prevalence ranging from 22.5% to 54.1% in AD, 55.9% to 73.9% in DLB, and 18% to 42% in FTD. Throughout all stages of these diseases, noticeable patterns emerge depending on their underlying causes. Misidentification delusions (16.6-78.3%) and visual hallucinations (50-69.6%) are frequently observed in DLB, while paranoid ideas and somatic preoccupations seem to be particularly common in AD and FTD, (respectively 9.1-60.3% and 3.10-41.5%). Limited data were found regarding psychosis in the early stages of these disorders.

Conclusions

Literature data suggest that different ND are associated with noticeable variations in psychotic phenotypes, reflecting disease-specific tendencies. Further studies focusing on the early stages of these disorders are necessary to enhance our understanding of early psychotic manifestations associated with ND and help in differential diagnosis issues.

A narrative review on mild behavioural impairment: an exploration into its scientific perspectives

In clinical practice, the admission of patients with late-onset psychological and behavioural symptoms is frequent, regardless of the presence or absence of cognitive decline. These symptoms commonly occur in the prodromal stage of dementia and can precede the onset of dementia. While the concept of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) -which is defined as a level of cognitive impairment insufficient to impact daily functioning- is well established, the notion of Mild Behavioural Impairment (MBI) is not yet widely recognized. However, studies have demonstrated that the presence of MBI in both cognitively normal patients and individuals with MCI is associated with an increased risk of dementia progression. Thus, MBI may serve as a neurobehavioral indicator of pre-dementia risk states. This narrative review aims to discuss the evolution of the term, the relevant clinical aspects, and potential biomarkers that may contribute to the clinical definition of MBI. The objective is to assist clinicians in recognizing the diagnosis and differentiating it from psychiatric syndromes, as well as identifying possible etiologies of neurodegeneration.

Plasma Concentrations of Neurofilament Light Chain Protein and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor as Consistent Biomarkers of Cognitive Impairment in Alcohol Use Disorder

For a long time, Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) were not considered a component in the etiology of dementia. The fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders introduced substance-induced neurocognitive disorders, incorporating this notion to clinical practice. However, detection and monitoring of neurodegenerative processes in SUD patients remain a major clinical challenge, especially when early diagnosis is required. In the present study, we aimed to investigate new potential biomarkers of neurodegeneration that could predict cognitive impairment in SUD patients: the circulating concentrations of Neurofilament Light chain protein (NfL) and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF). Sixty SUD patients were compared with twenty-seven dementia patients and forty healthy controls. SUD patients were recruited and assessed using the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental (PRISM) and a battery of neuropsychological tests, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test for evaluation of cognitive impairment. When compared to healthy control subjects, SUD patients showed increases in plasma NfL concentrations and NfL/BDNF ratio, as well as reduced plasma BDNF levels. These changes were remarkable in SUD patients with moderate-severe cognitive impairment, being comparable to those observed in dementia patients. NfL concentrations correlated with executive function and memory cognition in SUD patients. The parameters "age", "NfL/BDNF ratio", "first time alcohol use", "age of onset of alcohol use disorder", and "length of alcohol use disorder diagnosis" were able to stratify our SUD sample into patients with cognitive impairment from those without cognitive dysfunction with great specificity and sensibility. In conclusion, we propose the combined use of NfL and BDNF (NfL/BDNF ratio) to monitor substance-induced neurocognitive disorder.

Plasma neurofilament light chain in memory clinic practice: Evidence from a real-life study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the accuracy of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a biomarker for diagnosis and staging of cognitive impairment, in a large cohort with of previously diagnosed patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

Retrospective, cross-sectional, monocentric study, from a tertiary memory clinic. Patients underwent cerebrospinal fluid core Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker evaluation using ELISA or Elecsys methods, and plasma NfL analysis using the single molecule array technology. The patients' biomarker data were examined for associations with: i/cognitive status ii/presence of neurodegenerative disease and iii/diagnostic groups. Associations between core CSF biomarkers and plasma NfL were determined.

RESULTS

Participants (N = 558, mean age = 69.2 ± 8.8, 56.5% women) were diagnosed with AD (n = 274, considering dementia and MCI stages), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 55), Lewy body disease (LBD, n = 40, considering MCI and dementia stages), other neurodegenerative diseases, n = 57 (e.g Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal syndrome), non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (NND, n = 79, e.g. vascular lesions, epilepsy or psychiatric disorders) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 53). Mean plasma NfL (log, pg/mL) levels were higher in neurodegenerative than non-neurodegenerative disorders (1.35 ± 0.2 vs 1.16 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), higher in all diagnostic groups than in SCI (1.06 ± 0.23) p < 0.001), and associated with the stage of cognitive impairment (p < 0.001). The addition of plasma NfL to a clinical model (age, MMSE and APOE ε4 carriership) marginally improved the discrimination of degenerative from non-degenerative disorders in ROC analysis (AUC clinical model: 0.81, 95% CI = [0.77;0.85] AUC clinical model + plasma NfL: AUC = 0.83 95% CI = [0.78;0.87], delta Akaike information criterion = -11.7).

DISCUSSION

Plasma NfL could help discrimination between degenerative and non-degenerative cognitive disorders, albeit not better than comprehensive clinical evaluation.

Neurofilaments contribution in clinic: state of the art

Neurological biomarkers are particularly valuable to clinicians as they can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, or response to treatment. This field of neurology has evolved considerably in recent years with the improvement of analytical methods, allowing the detection of biomarkers not only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but also in less invasive fluids like blood. These advances greatly facilitate the repeated quantification of biomarkers, including at asymptomatic stages of the disease. Among the various informative biomarkers of neurological disorders, neurofilaments (NfL) have proven to be of particular interest in many contexts, such as neurodegenerative diseases, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and cancer. Here we discuss these different pathologies and the potential value of NfL assay in the management of these patients, both for diagnosis and prognosis. We also describe the added value of NfL compared to other biomarkers currently used to monitor the diseases described in this review.

Neurofilament light protein as a biomarker in depression and cognitive function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Converging evidence suggest axonal damage is implicated in depression and cognitive function. Neurofilament light protein, measured within serum and cerebrospinal fluid, may be a biomarker of axonal damage. This article examines the emerging evidence implicating neurofilament light protein in depression and cognitive function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preliminary cross-sectional and case-control studies in cohorts with depression have yielded inconsistent results regarding the association between neurofilament light protein and symptomatology. However, these studies had methodological limitations, requiring further investigation. Importantly, neurofilament light protein concentrations may be a marker of progression of cognitive decline and may be associated with cognitive performance within cognitively intact cohorts.

SUMMARY

Axonal damage is implicated in the neuropathology of depression and cognitive dysfunction. Consequently, neurofilament light protein is an emerging biomarker with potential in depression and cognitive function. Results are more consistent for cognition, requiring more research to assess neurofilament light protein in depression as well as other psychiatric disorders. Future longitudinal studies are necessary to determine whether neurofilament light protein can predict the onset and progression of depression and measure the effectiveness of potential psychiatric interventions and medications.