Diagnostic Accuracy of CareStart™ Malaria HRP2 and SD Bioline Pf/PAN for Malaria in Febrile Outpatients in Varying Malaria Transmission Settings in Cameroon

Welcome to the next generation of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests: Comparative Analysis of NxTek Eliminate Malaria P.f, Biocredit Malaria Ag Pf, and SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf for Plasmodium falciparum Diagnosis in Ghana

Background

Accurate diagnosis and timely treatment are crucial in combating malaria.

Methods

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of three Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) in diagnosing febrile patients, namely: Abbott NxTek Eliminate Malaria Ag Pf (detecting HRP2), Rapigen Biocredit Malaria Ag Pf (detecting HRP2 and LDH on separate bands), and SD Bioline Malaria Ag Pf (detecting HRP2). Results were compared to qPCR.

Results

Among 449 clinical patients, 45.7% (205/449) tested positive by qPCR for P. falciparum with a mean parasite density of 12.5parasites/μL. The sensitivity of the Biocredit RDT was 52.2% (107/205), NxTek RDT was 49.3% (101/205), and Bioline RDT was 40.5% (83/205). When samples with parasite densities lower than 20 parasites/uL were excluded (n=116), a sensitivity of 88.8% (79/89, NxTek), 89.9% (80/89, Biocredit), and 78.7% (70/89, Bioline) was obtained. All three RDTs demonstrated specificity above 95%. The limits of detection was 84 parasites/μL (NxTek), 56 parasites/μL (Biocredit, considering either HRP2 or LDH), and 331 parasites/μL (Bioline). None of the three qPCR-confirmed P. falciparum positive samples, identified solely through the LDH target, carried hrp2/3 deletions.

Conclusion

The Biocredit and NxTek RDTs demonstrated comparable diagnostic efficacies and both RDTs performed better than Bioline RDT.

Enzyme-linked aptamer-based sandwich assay (ELASA) for detecting Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase, a malarial biomarker

Herein, we report a sensitive and selective enzyme-linked aptamer-based sandwich assay (ELASA) to detect Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH), which is an attractive biomarker for malaria diagnosis and antimalarial medication. We performed the sandwich assay with a single aptamer sequence, called 2008s, owing to the structural properties of the PfLDH tetramer instead of using a conventional sandwich assay with two different aptamers (or antibodies) for capturing and probing a target molecule. First, the biotinylated PfLDH aptamer was linked with immobilized streptavidin on a microwell plate for binding flexibility, and then PfLDH was bound to the aptamer. Next, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated aptamer of the same sequence was used to analyze PfLDH quantitatively. Using this approach, the limit of detection (LOD) of PfLDH with the naked eye was 100 ng mL^-1, and the LOD and limit of quantification from the absorbance measurements were 34.9 ng mL^-1 and 95.5 ng mL^-1, respectively, based on PfLDH spiked blood samples. Our proposed method selectively binds PfLDH, not human lactate dehydrogenase. Therefore, this method may be a valuable tool for diagnosing, monitoring, and quarantining malaria cases easily and rapidly.

Field performance of Plasmodium falciparum lactate dehydrogenase rapid diagnostic tests during a large histidine-rich protein 2 deletion survey in Ethiopia

Background

Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have expanded diagnostic service to remote endemic communities in Ethiopia, where 70% of malaria services per annum are reliant on them. However, diagnostic strategies are threatened by Plasmodium falciparum parasites with deletions of the histidine-rich protein 2 and/or 3 (pfhrp2/3) genes. Studies have reported pfhrp2/3 gene deletion prevalence in Ethiopia that exceeds the WHO recommended threshold to switch to non-HRP2 targeted RDTs for detection of P. falciparum. Therefore, RDTs that target alternative antigens, such as P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH) are increasingly in programmatic use.

Methods

Malaria suspected patients visiting health facilities of Amhara, Tigray, Gambella, and Oromia regions of Ethiopia were screened by community health workers using Carestart Pf/Pv (HRP2/Pv-LDH) and SD-Bioline Pf (HRP2 for Pf/LDH for Pf) RDTs. Dried blood spot (DBS) samples were collected from selected patients for molecular and serological analysis. The clinical data and RDT results were recorded on standard forms, entered into EpiInfo, and analysed using STATA. The Pf-LDH detecting RDT results were compared with real-time PCR and bead-based immunoassay to determine their diagnostic performance.

Results

The 13,172 (56% male and 44% female, median age of 19 years ranging from 1 to 99 year) study participants were enrolled and tested with PfHRP2 and PfLDH detection RDTs; 20.6% (95% CI: 19.6 to 21.6) were P. falciparum RDT positive. A subset of samples (n = 820) were previously tested using P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (pfldh) quantitative real-time PCR, and 456 of these further characterized using bead-based immunoassay. The proportion of samples positive for P. falciparum by the PfHRP2 Carestart and SD-Bioline RDTs were 66% (539/820) and 59% (481/820), respectively; 68% (561/820) were positive for the PfLDH band on the SD-Bioline RDT. The sensitivity and specificity of the PfLDH RDT band were 69% and 38%, respectively, versus pfldh qPCR; and 72% and 36%, respectively, versus PfLDH detection by immunoassay. Among samples with results for RDT, qPCR, and immunoassay, higher proportions of P. falciparum were recorded by pfldh qPCR (90%, 411/456) and PfLDH immunoassay (88%, 363/413) compared to the PfLDH band on the SD-Bioline RDT (74.6%, 340/456).

Conclusion and recommendation

Both PfHRP2 RDTs detected fewer P. falciparum cases than PfLDH, and fewer cases than qPCR or immunoassay. The poor sensitivity and specificity of the PfLDH RDT compared to qPCR and to immunoassay in this study raises concern. Continuous operator training and RDTs quality assurance programme to ensure quality diagnostic services are recommended.

Comparison of Rapid Diagnostic Test, Microscopy, and Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Detection of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in a Low-Transmission Area, Jazan Region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the performances of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT)—the AllTest Malaria p.f./p.v., microscopy, and nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosing Plasmodium falciparum malaria in 400 febrile patients from a low-transmission region (Jazan) in southwestern Saudi Arabia. Diagnostic performance of all three methods was compared using microscopy and nested PCR as reference methods. Overall, 42 (10.5%), 48 (12.0%), and 57 (14.3%) samples were found positive by microscopy, RDT, and PCR, respectively. With PCR as reference method, the RDT showed higher sensitivity (79% vs. 71.9%), similar specificity (99.1% vs. 99.7%), and better NLR (0.20 vs. 0.27) and area under the curve (89.0% vs. 85.8%) than microscopy. The sensitivity of RDT and microscopy decreased as age increased, and false negatives were associated with low parasite density. In addition, the sensitivity of RDT and microscopy was higher in non-Saudi than in Saudi participants. Against microscopy, both RDT and PCR showed high sensitivity (83.3% vs. 97.6%), specificity (96.4% vs. 95.5%), and NPVs (98.0% vs. 99.7%), but reduced PPVs (72.9% vs. 71.9%), respectively. The results showed that the performance of the AllTest Malaria p.f./p.v RDT was better than that of microscopy in diagnosing P. falciparum malaria among febrile patients in the Jazan region when nested PCR was used as the reference. However, further studies are required to assess malaria diagnostic methods among asymptomatic individuals in the region.