Flap Thickness and the Risk of Complications in Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Literature Review and Statistical Analysis

Comparison of risk factors for OBL in FS-LASIK and SMILE correction for myopia and myopia astigmatism

BACKGROUND

To find out the incidence and risk factors of opaque bubble layer (OBL) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism following femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

METHODS

A total of 1076 eyes from 569 patients who had FS-LASIK or SMILE were included in the retrospective research. For each kind of surgery, eyes were separated into two groups: "OBL" groups and "no OBL" groups. In the FS-LASIK group, eyes that developed OBL were split into "hard OBL" and "soft OBL" groups. The incidence and size of OBL were analyzed after watching the surgical procedure videotaped during the operation and taking screenshots. Surgical parameters, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, corneal thickness, flap thickness, cap thickness, lenticule thickness, and visual acuity, were compared.

RESULTS

In the FS-LASIK surgery, the incidence of OBL was 63.2% (347 eyes). A thicker central corneal thickness (CCT) was the only independent risk factor affecting the OBL area (β = 0.126, P = 0.019). One hundred and thirty of these eyes had hard OBL, and the flap thickness of these eyes was thinner than that of those with soft OBL (P = 0.027). In the SMILE group, 26.6% (140 eyes) developed OBL. A higher flat keratometry (K) and a thicker residual stromal thickness (RST) were risk factors affecting the OBL area (β = 0.195, P = 0.024; β = 0.281, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of OBL differs between the FS-LASIK surgery and the SMILE surgery. There are differences in the factors influencing OBL between the two surgeries.

Corneal foreign body post laser in-situ keratomileusis: Diagnosis, management, outcome and review of literature

Purpose

To report a case of metallic corneal foreign-body (CFB) penetrating the Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap and its successful outcome. To highlight usefulness of Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) in diagnosis and management of post-LASIK CFB. To enumerate other similar cases published in literature.

Method

A 30-year-old male presented to the emergency department of a tertiary eye care centre with a metallic CFB. He had undergone uneventful LASIK elsewhere 4-years back. He was unaware of any trauma. CFB removal was attempted elsewhere but abandoned as CFB appeared deeply embedded. ASOCT showed CFB had penetrated LASIK flap and lodged into midstroma, 207 μm deep. CFB was successfully removed in operation theatre along with the application of cyanoacrylate glue and bandage contact lens. A review of literature for CFB in post-LASIK patients was done through PubMed search.

Result

Postoperative course was uncomplicated and there was a follow up period of 4 months. Vision improved to unaided 20/20 and N/6 from preoperative 20/60 and N/10. Review of literature of 24 patients showed Post-LASIK FB was more common in males (79%). None of the patients except for one had protective eye-wear. Metallic FB was most common followed by organic FB. Flap complications were present in seven patients. Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) and epithelial ingrowth were the most common post-FB removal complications occurring in six (25%) and four (16.6%) patients respectively.

Conclusion

Post-LASIK patients with CFB need to be inspected for flap related complications. CFB can be successfully removed, although DLK, epithelial ingrowth, microbial keratitis, astigmatism, can occur post-CFB removal. ASOCT can delineate CFB and flap related details and thus is an additional useful imaging tool in such scenarios.

Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (CAIRS) for Corneal Ectasia: A Comprehensive Segmental Tomography Evaluation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual, refractive, and tomographic results of patients with corneal ectasia treated with corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments (CAIRS) insertion without concomitant corneal cross-linking.

METHODS

Fifty-two eyes from 39 patients with stable corneal ectasia and unsatisfactory visual acuity with contact lenses were included. All patients underwent CAIRS insertion with no concomitant corneal procedure at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between September 2019 and July 2022. Visual, refractive, topographic, aberrometric, epithelial, stromal, and segment thickness data were measured relative to baseline at 1 week, 1 month, and at least 3 months postoperatively. Evaluations included slit-lamp examination, manifest refraction, uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, and tomography using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time was 6.9 ± 5.2 months. UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.97 ± 0.47 and 0.56 ± 0.19 preoperatively to 0.52 ± 0.21 (P < .001) and 0.23 ± 0.19 (P < .001) 3 months postoperatively. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and cylinder improved from -6.71 ± 6.51 and -4.02 ± 2.24 diopters (D) preoperatively to -3.78 ± 4.07 D (P < .001) and -2.35 ± 1.98 D (P < .001) 3 months postoperatively, respectively. Maximum anterior keratometry and vertical coma decreased from 58.09 ± 7.92 D and 1.56 ± 1.09 µm to 52.48 ± 6.69 D (P < .001) and 0.43 ± 0.77 µm, respectively (P < .001). Corneal epithelium thickened proximal to the allogenic segment by 7.25 µm (P < .001), whereas stromal elevation at the cone decreased from 38.61 ± 18.5 to 23.82 ± 13.4 µm, respectively (P < .001). No major complications were observed and only 1 eye lost one line of CDVA.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of corneal ectasia with CAIRS improved visual, refractive, topographic, and tomographic parameters. Epithelial thickening central to CAIRS, along with anterior stromal flattening is postulated to contribute to tomographic flattening and regularization. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(11):767-776.].

[Complications of femto-LASIK and features of cavitation injuries]

Modern approach to refractive laser surgery features three main types of lamellar surgery. Two of them are types of open laser keratomileusis (LASIK and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK), and the third - closed (SMILE). All of these techniques allow achieving good clinical outcomes but differ in possible complications. This article reviews the complications of femto-LASIK and specifically the post-operative cavitation injuries, describes the mechanism of their occurrence, variants of their course, and presents the prevention measures.

Early LASIK flap displacement without signs of infection

A 37-year-old woman was referred for refractive surgery evaluation. Poor visual quality in her left eye is her chief concern. The patient had undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in both eyes 3 days previously. Detailed history revealed that the patient underwent surgery to correct low myopia and astigmatism (-2.50 -2.75 × 180 in the right eye and -1.25 -2.75 × 180 in the left eye). The preoperative evaluation corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 20/20 in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. The surgery was performed with a mechanical microkeratome and was uneventful. The patient reports that after her vision improved on the first day, she woke up with blurry vision in her left eye on the second day and it remained that way until the third day when she sought medical help. The slitlamp examination showed LASIK flap displacement without signs of infection ( Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202212000-00023/figure1/v/2022-12-01T092452Z/r/image-tiff ). The patient was using topical corticosteroids and topical antibiotics every 6 hours. Considering the likely stromal exposure time, what would be the best approach for this case? Does the probable time of displacement of this flap change its behavior? In what way? If you decide to reposition the flap, would it be interesting to use fibrin glue or suture? Considering that there was no major trauma in the patient's report, what is the importance of the LASIK flap having been created by a mechanical microkeratome and not by a femtosecond laser in the displacement of the flap?

VisuMax Flap 2.0: a flap plus technique to reduce incidence of an opaque bubble layer in femtosecond laser–assisted LASIK

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence of an opaque bubble layer (OBL) in femtosecond laser–assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) flaps created with VisuMax Flap 2.0 as a result of a modification in the parameters of the flap programming.

Methods

This retrospective study was comprised of 1400 eyes of 715 patients who received FS-LASIK surgery. OBLs were measured and reported as a percentage of the flap area to identify the incidence and extent. Flap creation, which is a modification technique, was performed with 8.1-mm flap diameters plus 0.3-mm enlarged interlamellar photodisruption (group Flap 2.0). The same flap diameters without extra photodisruption as the previous standard setting were also implemented (group Flap 1.0). The preoperative measurements, including sphere, cylinder, keratometry, and intraoperative characteristics such as flap size and thickness, were documented. Possible risk factors for the occurrence of OBLs were investigated in this study.

Results

The incidence of an OBL was reduced when using the Flap 2.0 program (31.4%) compared to the Flap 1.0 program (63.7%). The area of hard and soft OBLs created by the Flap 2.0 program is smaller than those created by the Flap 1.0 program (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that a thinner flap (P = 0.038) and a higher sphere (P = 0.001) affected the chance of hard OBLs occurring.

Conclusion

The VisuMax Flap 2.0 program promotes gas venting by enlarging the interlamellar photodisruption size. The incidence and extent of OBLs appear to be reduced significantly when the Flap 2.0 program is applied.

Accuracy of the Preoperative Predicted Percentage of Tissue Altered Calculation in Refractive Surgery Planning for Myopic LASIK

PURPOSE

To determine the reliability of the percentage of tissue altered (PTA) calculation as part of the planning strategy for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) by comparing the estimated PTA provided by preoperative calculation to the postoperative PTA actually achieved in microkeratome-assisted myopic LASIK.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 3,624 eyes of 3,624 patients who underwent mechanical microkeratome-assisted LASIK surgery for myopic correction. The calculated preoperative PTA values based on the planned flap thickness and ablation depth were compared with the actual achieved postoperative PTA using the difference of corneal central thickness postoperatively for assessing the achieved ablation depth and the intraoperative ultrasound-assisted flap thickness measurement. Regression analysis was performed to reveal preoperative parameters that might influence PTA calculation accuracy.

RESULTS

The mean difference between the estimated and achieved PTA was 0.451 ± 3.45% (P < .001) (95% CI: 0.3708 to 0.5322) with a preoperative and postoperative mean PTA of 31.07 ± 4.07% and 31.52 ± 5.78%, respectively. The differences between the achieved and planned maximum ablation depth and flap thickness were 4.32 ± 13.70 µm (P < .001) and -1.61 ± 13.66 µm (P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a statistically significant difference was found between the preoperative calculated PTA and actually achieved PTA, the difference in PTA value (less than 1%) was clinically non-significant and indicated a highly reliable metric for preoperative refractive surgery planning. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(7):422-427.].