Automatized Detection and Categorization of Fissure Sealants from Intraoral Digital Photographs Using Artificial Intelligence

AI-Driven Innovations in Pediatric Dentistry: Enhancing Care and Improving Outcome

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming pediatric dentistry by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, streamlining treatment planning, and improving behavior management. This review explores current AI applications in detecting dental anomalies, categorizing fissure sealants, assessing chronological age, and managing patient behavior. The review also identifies emerging trends and future directions in AI technology that promise to further revolutionize pediatric dental care. By synthesizing recent research and clinical studies, this review aimed to inform dental professionals and researchers about the potential of AI to address traditional challenges and improve oral health outcomes for children.

Simultaneous detection of dental caries and fissure sealant in intraoral photos by deep learning: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Deep learning, as an artificial intelligence method has been proved to be powerful in analyzing images. The purpose of this study is to construct a deep learning-based model (ToothNet) for the simultaneous detection of dental caries and fissure sealants in intraoral photos.

METHODS

A total of 1020 intraoral photos were collected from 762 volunteers. Teeth, caries and sealants were annotated by two endodontists using the LabelMe tool. ToothNet was developed by modifying the YOLOX framework for simultaneous detection of caries and fissure sealants. The area under curve (AUC) in the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and free-response ROC (FROC) curves were used to evaluate model performance in the following aspects: (i) classification accuracy of detecting dental caries and fissure sealants from a photograph (image-level); and (ii) localization accuracy of the locations of predicted dental caries and fissure sealants (tooth-level). The performance of ToothNet and dentist with 1year of experience (1-year dentist) were compared at tooth-level and image-level using Wilcoxon test and DeLong test.

RESULTS

At the image level, ToothNet achieved an AUC of 0.925 (95% CI, 0.880-0.958) for caries detection and 0.902 (95% CI, 0.853-0.940) for sealant detection. At the tooth level, with a confidence threshold of 0.5, the sensitivity, precision, and F1-score for caries detection were 0.807, 0.814, and 0.810, respectively. For fissure sealant detection, the values were 0.714, 0.750, and 0.731. Compared with ToothNet, the 1-year dentist had a lower F1 value (0.599, p < 0.0001) and AUC (0.749, p < 0.0001) in caries detection, and a lower F1 value (0.727, p = 0.023) and similar AUC (0.829, p = 0.154) in sealant detection.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed deep learning model achieved multi-task simultaneous detection in intraoral photos and showed good performance in the detection of dental caries and fissure sealants. Compared with 1-year dentist, the model has advantages in caries detection and is equivalent in fissure sealants detection.

Automatized Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs by Vision Transformer Networks

Several artificial intelligence-based models have been presented for the detection of periodontal bone loss (PBL), mostly using convolutional neural networks, which are the state of the art in deep learning. Given the emerging breakthrough of transformer networks in computer vision, we aimed to evaluate various models for automatized PBL detection. An image data set of 21,819 anonymized periapical radiographs from the upper/lower and anterior/posterior regions was assessed by calibrated dentists according to PBL. Five vision transformer networks (ViT-base/ViT-large from Google, BEiT-base/BEiT-large from Microsoft, DeiT-base from Facebook/Meta) were utilized and evaluated. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were statistically determined. The overall diagnostic ACC and AUC values ranged from 83.4 to 85.2% and 0.899 to 0.918 for all evaluated transformer networks, respectively. Differences in diagnostic performance were evident for lower (ACC 94.1-96.7%; AUC 0.944-0.970) and upper anterior (86.7-90.2%; 0.948-0.958) and lower (85.6-87.2%; 0.913-0.937) and upper posterior teeth (78.1-81.0%; 0.851-0.875). In this study, only minor differences among the tested networks were detected for PBL detection. To increase the diagnostic performance and to support the clinical use of such networks, further optimisations with larger and manually annotated image data sets are needed.

Detection and localization of caries and hypomineralization on dental photographs with a vision transformer model

Caries and molar-incisor hypomineralization (MIH) are among the most prevalent diseases worldwide and need to be reliably diagnosed. The use of dental photographs and artificial intelligence (AI) methods may potentially contribute to realizing accurate and automated diagnostic visual examinations in the future. Therefore, the present study aimed to develop an AI-based algorithm that can detect, classify and localize caries and MIH. This study included an image set of 18,179 anonymous photographs. Pixelwise image labeling was achieved by trained and calibrated annotators using the Computer Vision Annotation Tool (CVAT). All annotations were made according to standard methods and were independently checked by an experienced dentist. The entire image set was divided into training (N = 16,679), validation (N = 500) and test sets (N = 1000). The AI-based algorithm was trained and finetuned over 250 epochs by using image augmentation and adapting a vision transformer network (SegFormer-B5). Statistics included the determination of the intersection over union (IoU), average precision (AP) and accuracy (ACC). The overall diagnostic performance in terms of IoU, AP and ACC were 0.959, 0.977 and 0.978 for the finetuned model, respectively. The corresponding data for the most relevant caries classes of non-cavitations (0.630, 0.813 and 0.990) and dentin cavities (0.692, 0.830, and 0.997) were found to be high. MIH-related demarcated opacity (0.672, 0.827, and 0.993) and atypical restoration (0.829, 0.902, and 0.999) showed similar results. Here, we report that the model achieves excellent precision for pixelwise detection and localization of caries and MIH. Nevertheless, the model needs to be further improved and externally validated.

Artificial Intelligence Its Uses and Application in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review

In the global epidemic era, oral problems significantly impact a major population of children. The key to a child’s optimal health is early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of these disorders. In recent years, the field of artificial intelligence (AI) has seen tremendous pace and progress. As a result, AI’s infiltration is witnessed even in those areas that were traditionally thought to be best left to human specialists. The ultimate ability to improve patient care and make precise diagnoses of illnesses has revolutionized the world of healthcare. In the field of dentistry, the competence to execute treatment measures while still providing appropriate patient behavior counseling is in high demand, particularly in the field of pediatric dental care. As a result, we decided to conduct this review specifically to examine the applications of AI models in pediatric dentistry. A comprehensive search of the subjects was done using a wide range of databases to look for studies that have been published in peer-reviewed journals from its inception until 31 December 2022. After the application of the criteria, only 25 of the 351 articles were taken into consideration for this review. According to the literature, AI is frequently used in pediatric dentistry for the purpose of making an accurate diagnosis and assisting clinicians, dentists, and pediatric dentists in clinical decision making, developing preventive strategies, and establishing an appropriate treatment plan.

Analysis of Deep Learning Techniques for Dental Informatics: A Systematic Literature Review

Within the ever-growing healthcare industry, dental informatics is a burgeoning field of study. One of the major obstacles to the health care system’s transformation is obtaining knowledge and insightful data from complex, high-dimensional, and diverse sources. Modern biomedical research, for instance, has seen an increase in the use of complex, heterogeneous, poorly documented, and generally unstructured electronic health records, imaging, sensor data, and text. There were still certain restrictions even after many current techniques were used to extract more robust and useful elements from the data for analysis. New effective paradigms for building end-to-end learning models from complex data are provided by the most recent deep learning technology breakthroughs. Therefore, the current study aims to examine the most recent research on the use of deep learning techniques for dental informatics problems and recommend creating comprehensive and meaningful interpretable structures that might benefit the healthcare industry. We also draw attention to some drawbacks and the need for better technique development and provide new perspectives about this exciting new development in the field.

Artificial intelligence-based diagnostics of molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) on intraoral photographs

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a deep learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) for the automated detection and categorization of teeth affected by molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) on intraoral photographs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data set consisted of 3241 intraoral images (767 teeth with no MIH/no intervention, 76 with no MIH/atypical restoration, 742 with no MIH/sealant, 815 with demarcated opacity/no intervention, 158 with demarcated opacity/atypical restoration, 181 with demarcated opacity/sealant, 290 with enamel breakdown/no intervention, 169 with enamel breakdown/atypical restoration, and 43 with enamel breakdown/sealant). These images were divided into a training (N = 2596) and a test sample (N = 649). All images were evaluated by an expert group, and each diagnosis served as a reference standard for cyclic training and evaluation of the CNN (ResNeXt-101-32 × 8d). Statistical analysis included the calculation of contingency tables, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) and saliency maps.

RESULTS

The developed CNN was able to categorize teeth with MIH correctly with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 95.2%. The overall SE and SP amounted to 78.6% and 97.3%, respectively, which indicate that the CNN performed better in healthy teeth compared to those with MIH. The AUC values ranging from 0.873 (enamel breakdown/sealant) to 0.994 (atypical restoration/no MIH).

CONCLUSION

It was possible to categorize the majority of clinical photographs automatically by using a trained deep learning-based CNN with an acceptably high diagnostic accuracy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Artificial intelligence-based dental diagnostics may support dental diagnostics in the future regardless of the need to improve accuracy.

Automated detection of posterior restorations in permanent teeth using artificial intelligence on intraoral photographs

OBJECTIVES

Intraoral photographs might be considered the machine-readable equivalent of a clinical-based visual examination and can potentially be used to detect and categorize dental restorations. The first objective of this study was to develop a deep learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) for automated detection and categorization of posterior composite, cement, amalgam, gold and ceramic restorations on clinical photographs. Second, this study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy for the developed CNN (test method) compared to that of an expert evaluation (reference standard).

METHODS

The whole image set of 1,761 images (483 of unrestored teeth, 570 of composite restorations, 213 of cements, 278 of amalgam restorations, 125 of gold restorations and 92 of ceramic restorations) was divided into a training set (N=1,407, 401, 447, 66, 231, 93, and 169, respectively) and a test set (N=354, 82, 123, 26, 47, 32, and 44). The expert diagnoses served as a reference standard for cyclic training and repeated evaluation of the CNN (ResNeXt-101-32x8d), which was trained by using image augmentation and transfer learning. Statistical analysis included the calculation of contingency tables, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and saliency maps.

RESULTS

After training was complete, the CNN was able to categorize restorations correctly with the following diagnostic accuracy values: 94.9% for unrestored teeth, 92.9% for composites, 98.3% for cements, 99.2% for amalgam restorations, 99.4% for gold restorations and 97.8% for ceramic restorations.

CONCLUSIONS

It was possible to categorize different types of posterior restorations on intraoral photographs automatically with a good diagnostic accuracy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Dental diagnostics might be supported by artificial intelligence-based algorithms in the future. However, further improvements are needed to increase accuracy and practicability.