A Personalized Medical Decision Support System Based on Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms and ECC Features: Data from the Real World

Trust and acceptability of data-driven clinical recommendations in everyday practice: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Increasing attention is being given to the analysis of large health datasets to derive new clinical decision support systems (CDSS). However, few data-driven CDSS are being adopted into clinical practice. Trust in these tools is believed to be fundamental for acceptance and uptake but to date little attention has been given to defining or evaluating trust in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVES

A scoping review was conducted to explore how and where acceptability and trustworthiness of data-driven CDSS have been assessed from the health professional's perspective.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital, IEEE Xplore and Google Scholar were searched in March 2022 using terms expanded from: "data-driven" AND "clinical decision support" AND "acceptability". Included studies focused on healthcare practitioner-facing data-driven CDSS, relating directly to clinical care. They included trust or a proxy as an outcome, or in the discussion. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) is followed in the reporting of this review.

RESULTS

3291 papers were screened, with 85 primary research studies eligible for inclusion. Studies covered a diverse range of clinical specialisms and intended contexts, but hypothetical systems (24) outnumbered those in clinical use (18). Twenty-five studies measured trust, via a wide variety of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. A further 24 discussed themes of trust without it being explicitly evaluated, and from these, themes of transparency, explainability, and supporting evidence were identified as factors influencing healthcare practitioner trust in data-driven CDSS.

CONCLUSION

There is a growing body of research on data-driven CDSS, but few studies have explored stakeholder perceptions in depth, with limited focused research on trustworthiness. Further research on healthcare practitioner acceptance, including requirements for transparency and explainability, should inform clinical implementation.

Evaluation of Serum Fructosamine as Diagnostic Marker of Postoperative Recurrence in the Patients with Breast Cancer

Objectives

A series of laboratory parameters were screened to identify the proper serum markers that could be used to predict breast cancer recurrence at an early stage.

Methods

A case-control retrospective study on 224 patients without postoperative recurrence and 43 patients with postoperative recurrence of breast cancer was performed. The edgeR software package was used to identify the test indicators expressed differently between the two groups. Univariate analysis was used to screen for diagnostic marker that could predict postoperative recurrence of breast cancer. In addition, the differential test indicators at different time points from surgery to recurrence were collected in patients with postoperative recurrence of breast cancer as a verification database.

Results

We screened out three test indicators (TBA, GSP, and URBC) for differential expression, which were all expressed downregulated in the postoperative recurrence group of breast cancer. Univariate analysis suggested that only the difference in GSP levels between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of GSP was 0.662, while the area under the curve of GSP+AFP+CEA+CA125+CA153+age was increased to 0.828. In addition, serum GSP levels were significantly reduced after recurrence compared with before recurrence in breast cancer patients (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

In summary, GSP could be used for early diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence after surgery, and the predicted value of combining GSP, tumor markers, and age was better than that of individual indicators.

An Adaptive Deep Ensemble Learning Method for Dynamic Evolving Diagnostic Task Scenarios

Increasingly, machine learning methods have been applied to aid in diagnosis with good results. However, some complex models can confuse physicians because they are difficult to understand, while data differences across diagnostic tasks and institutions can cause model performance fluctuations. To address this challenge, we combined the Deep Ensemble Model (DEM) and tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) and proposed an adaptive deep ensemble learning method (TPE-DEM) for dynamic evolving diagnostic task scenarios. Different from previous research that focuses on achieving better performance with a fixed structure model, our proposed model uses TPE to efficiently aggregate simple models more easily understood by physicians and require less training data. In addition, our proposed model can choose the optimal number of layers for the model and the type and number of basic learners to achieve the best performance in different diagnostic task scenarios based on the data distribution and characteristics of the current diagnostic task. We tested our model on one dataset constructed with a partner hospital and five UCI public datasets with different characteristics and volumes based on various diagnostic tasks. Our performance evaluation results show that our proposed model outperforms other baseline models on different datasets. Our study provides a novel approach for simple and understandable machine learning models in tasks with variable datasets and feature sets, and the findings have important implications for the application of machine learning models in computer-aided diagnosis.