Dual-Energy Lung Perfusion in Portal Venous Phase CT-A Comparison with the Pulmonary Arterial Phase

Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CTPA With Iodine Maps: A Prospective Randomized Study of High-Pitch Mode Photon-Counting Detector CT Versus Energy-Integrating Detector CT

BACKGROUND. Dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) with energy-integrating detector (EID) technology is limited by the inability to use high-pitch technique. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality of anatomic images and iodine maps between high-pitch photon-counting detector (PCD) CTPA and dual-energy EID CTPA. METHODS. This prospective study included 117 patients (70 men and 47 women; median age, 65 years) who underwent CTPA to evaluate for pulmonary embolism between March 2022 and November 2022. Fifty-eight patients were randomized to undergo PCD CTPA (pitch, 2.0), and 59 were randomized to undergo EID CTPA (pitch, 0.55). For each examination, 120-kV polychromatic images, 60-keV virtual monogenetic images (VMIs), and iodine maps were reconstructed. One radiologist measured CNR and SNR. Three radiologists independently assessed subjective image quality (on a scale of 1-4, with a score of 1 denoting highest quality). Radiation dose was recorded. RESULTS. SNR and CNR were higher for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images and VMIs, for all assessed vessels other than the left upper lobe artery. For example, for PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the right lower lobe artery on polychromatic images had an SNR of 34.5 versus 28.0 (p = .003) and a CNR of 29.2 versus 24.4 (p = .001), and on VMIs it had an SNR of 43.2 versus 32.7 (p = .005) and a CNR of 37.4 versus 29.3 (p = .002). For both scanners for readers 1 and 2, the median image quality score for polychromatic images and VMIs was 1, although distributions indicated significantly better scores for PCD CTPA than for EID CTPA for polychromatic images for reader 1 (p = .02) and reader 2 (p = .005) and for VMIs for reader 1 (p = .001) and reader 2 (p = .006). The image quality of anatomic image sets was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for reader 3 (p > .05). The image quality of iodine maps was not different between PCD CTPA and EID CTPA for any reader (p > .05). For PCD CTPA versus EID CTPA, the CTDIvol was 3.9 versus 4.5 mGy (p = .03), and the DLP was 123.5 mGy × cm versus 157.0 mGy × cm (p < .001). CONCLUSION. High-pitch PCD CTPA provided anatomic images with better subjective and objective image quality versus dual-energy EID CTPA, with lower radiation dose. Iodine maps showed no significant difference in image quality between scanners. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTPA may benefit from the PCD CT technique.

Personalization of thoracoabdominal CT examinations using scanner integrated clinical decision support systems - Impact on the acquisition technique, scan range, and reconstruction type

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates the impact of a scanner-integrated, customized clinical decision support system (CDSS) on the acquisition technique, scan range, and reconstruction in thoracoabdominal CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We applied CDSS in contrast-enhanced examinations of the trunk with various clinical indications on a recent scanner with the capability of dual-energy CT (DECT), anatomic landmark detection (ALD), and iterative metal-artifact reduction (MAR). Simple and comprehensive questions about the patient's breath hold capability, the anatomical region of interest, and metal implants can be answered after the localizer. The acquisition technique (single energy, SECT, or dual energy), scan range (chest-abdomen-pelvis or chest-abdomen), and reconstruction technique (with or without MAR) were then automatically adapted in the examination protocols in coherence with these selections. Retrospectively, we compared the usage rates for these techniques in 624 examinations on the study scanner with 740 examinations on a comparable scanner without CDSS. Subgroup analysis of effective dose (ED), scan duration, and image quality (IQ) was performed in the study group.

RESULTS

CDSS leads to an increased usage rate of DECT (64.4% vs. 2.8%) and MAR (75.4% vs. 44.0%). All scan range adaptations by ALD were successful. The resulting subjective IQ between single energy and DECT acquisitions was comparable (all p > 0.05). Scan duration was significantly longer in DECT than in SECT (16.9 s vs. 6.5 s; p < 0.001). However, the objective IQ was significantly higher in DECT (CNRD 2.1 vs. 1.8; p < 0.01), and the ED significantly lower (6.7 mSv vs. 7.6 mSv; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

CDSS for thoracoabdominal CT leads to a substantially increased usage rate of innovative techniques during acquisition and reconstruction. Patients with adapted protocols benefit from improved image quality and increased post-processing options at lower radiation doses.

Comparison of dual-energy CT with positron emission tomography for lung perfusion imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective.Functional lung avoidance (FLA) radiotherapy treatment aims to spare lung regions identified as functional from imaging. Perfusion contributes to lung function and can be measured from the determination of pulmonary blood volume (PBV). An advantageous alternative to the current determination of PBV from positron emission tomography (PET) may be from dual energy CT (DECT), due to shorter examination time and widespread availability. This study aims to determine the correlation between PBV determined from DECT and PET in the context of FLA radiotherapy.Approach.DECT and PET acquisitions at baseline of patients enrolled in the HI-FIVE clinical trial (ID: NCT03569072) were reviewed. Determination of PBV from PET imaging (PBVPET), from DECT imaging generated from a commercial software (Syngo.via, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) with its lowest (PBVsyngoR=1) and highest (PBVsyngoR=10) smoothing level parameter value (R), and from a two-material decomposition (TMD) method (PBVTMDL) with variable median filter kernel size (L) were compared. Deformable image registration between DECT images and the CT component of the PET/CT was applied to PBV maps before resampling to the PET resolution. The Spearman correlation coefficient (r_s) between PBV determinations was calculated voxel-wise in lung subvolumes.Main results.Of this cohort of 19 patients, 17 had a DECT acquisition at baseline. PBV maps determined from the commercial software and the TMD method were very strongly correlated [r_s(PBVsyngoR=1,PBVTMDL=1) = 0.94 ± 0.01 andr_s(PBVsyngoR=10,PBVTMDL=9) = 0.94 ± 0.02].PBVPETwas strongly correlated withPBVTMDL[r_s(PBVPET,PBVTMDL=28) = 0.67 ± 0.11]. Perfusion patterns differed along the posterior-anterior direction [r_s(PBVPET,PBVTMDL=28) = 0.77 ± 0.13/0.57 ± 0.16 in the anterior/posterior region].Significance. A strong correlation between DECT and PET determination of PBV was observed. Streak and smoothing effects in DECT and gravitational artefacts and misregistration in PET reduced the correlation posteriorly.