The Summarized Assessment of Endothelin A Receptor Expression in Renal Transplant Compartments Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Non-HLA Autoantibodies Against Angiotensin II Receptor 1 (AT1R) and Endothelin A Receptor (ETAR) in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of premature kidney transplant failure. The role of alloantibodies against Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA) has been a primary focus in AMR. More recently autoantibodies and alloantibodies against the angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and the endothelin A receptor (ETAR) have been linked to poor allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, evidence supporting routine testing remains insufficient. ELISA testing for anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies was performed in a pediatric renal transplant cohort. We selected 12 pediatric recipients who had undergone protocol biopsies and antibody measurements at 6 and 24 months post-transplant. Immunohistochemistry was performed on biopsies for AT1R and ETAR as well as the adhesion molecules ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. The analysis showed that ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 expression was significantly increased, along with the presence of circulating antibodies, in patients at 24 months post-transplant compared to patients without circulating antibodies. The presence of anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies does not seem to influence the expression of their receptors in the transplanted organ. Instead, the increase in adhesion molecules may precede the development of histological damage. Therefore, enlarging the cohort and extending long-term observation would help to understand the impact of anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR antibodies after transplantation.

Interstitial Foci Expression of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1: A Potential Biomarker for Kidney Transplant Rejection

(1) Background: Kidney transplantation is the best therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease, but the risk of rejection complicates it. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an enzyme involved in immune response modulation, has been suggested to play a role in transplant immunological injury. The aim of the study was to explore the expression of IDO1 in the interstitial foci of transplanted kidneys and its potential association with rejection episodes. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analysed kidney transplant biopsies from 121 patients, focusing on IDO1 expression in interstitial foci. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect IDO1, and patients were categorised based on IDO1 presence (IDO1-IF positive or negative). The incidence of rejection was compared between these groups. (3) Results: Patients with IDO1 expression in interstitial foci (IDO1-IF(+)) exhibited higher incidences of rejection 46/80 (57.5%) vs. 10/41 (24.34%) patients compared to IDO1-IF(-) patients, which was statistically significant with p = 0.0005. The analysis of antibody-mediated rejection showed that IDO1-IF(+) patients developed AMR at 12/80 (15%), while only 1 IDO1-IF(-) negative patient did (2,44%), with p = 0.035. T-cell-mediated rejection was also more common in IDO1-IF(+) patients 43/80 (53.75%) than in IDO1-IF(-) patients 7/41 (17.07%), with p = 0.0001. (4) Conclusions: IDO1 expression in interstitial foci of renal transplant biopsies is associated with a higher incidence of rejection, suggesting that IDO1 could serve as a potential biomarker for transplant rejection. These findings highlight the importance of IDO1 in immune regulation and its potential utility in improving the management of kidney transplant recipients.

Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) in Kidney Transplantation: A Guardian against Rejection

Kidney transplantation is a crucial treatment for end-stage kidney disease, with immunosuppressive drugs helping to reduce acute rejection rates. However, kidney graft longevity remains a concern. This study explores the role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) in kidney transplant immunology. IDO1 breaks down tryptophan, affecting immune cell behavior, primarily T-cells. The research focuses on both cellular and antibody-mediated immune responses, often causing graft damage. The study assessed IDO1 expression in renal transplant biopsies from patients with graft function decline, examining its connection to clinical parameters. A total of 121 biopsy samples were evaluated for IDO1 expression using immunohistochemistry. Patients were categorized as IDO1(+) positive or IDO1(-) negative based on immunoreactivity in tubular epithelium. Results showed a significant link between IDO1 expression and rejection incidence. IDO1(+) positive patients had lower rejection rates (32.9%) compared to IDO1(-) negative ones (62.2%) [p = 0.0017], with substantial differences in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (5.2% vs. 20%) [p = 0.0085] and T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) (31.6% vs. 57.8%). These associations suggest that IDO1 may play a protective role in kidney transplant rejection. IDO1 modulation could offer novel therapeutic avenues to enhance graft survival. The study underscores IDO1 as a potential marker for rejection risk assessment, with its potential applications in personalized interventions and improved patient outcomes. Further research is needed to fully comprehend the mechanisms behind IDO1's immunomodulatory functions and its potential clinical translation.

Association between anti-endothelial antigen antibodies and allograft rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Endothelial cells are vital in the transplant immune system as semiprofessional antigen-presenting cells. Few studies have investigated the importance of anti-endothelin subtype A receptor (ETAR) antibodies in kidney transplantation. Here, we aimed to analyze the association between anti-angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1R) and anti-ETAR antibodies and the association between the presence of anti-endothelial antibodies and the risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

In total, 252 patients who underwent kidney transplantation were enrolled in this study. Antibodies for human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) and non-HLAs were analyzed immediately before transplantation. Patients were categorized based on the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) or T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) by 2017 Banff classification. All p-values were two-tailed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients with anti-AT1R antibodies had a 3.49-fold higher risk of TCMR than those without anti-AT1R antibodies. Patients with anti-ETAR antibodies had a 5.84-fold higher risk of AMR than those without anti-ETAR antibodies. The hazard ratio of AMR in patients with both HLA DSAs and anti-ETAR antibodies, relative to patients without anti-ETAR antibodies and HLA DSAs, was 32.85 (95% CI = 1.82-592.91).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicated that anti-ETAR antibodies are associated with AMR, and patients with both anti-ETAR antibodies and de novo HLA DSAs were at a high risk of AMR.

Chronic Active T-Cell Mediated Kidney Rejection as a Clinically Significant Type of Allograft Loss?

The purpose of this article is to assess the present knowledge about chronic active (CA) T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) of a kidney. In the research authors review current Banff diagnostic criteria used in kidney rejection, focus on their possible future evolution, and investigate the role of currently available molecular methods that could be implemented into the diagnostic scheme. Research also points out previously and currently available treatment methods applied to CA TCMR and takes into account possible side effects consequent upon the therapy. Moreover, attention is being paid to the CA TCMR coincidence with other kidney rejection types such as antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and its influence on the treatment approach. Authors also mark the possibility of non-HLA antibodies coexistence in patients with CA TCMR and describe its possible resonance on kidney allograft function. Nonetheless, it seems that current knowledge about CA TCMR is not sufficient and requires further investigation.

Significance of Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase Expression in the Immunological Response of Kidney Graft Recipients

Kidney transplantation is unquestionably the most advantageous and preferred treatment when patients with end-stage renal disease are considered. It does have a substantially positive influence on both the quality and expectancy of their lives. Thus, it is quintessential to extend the survival rate of kidney grafts. On account of T-cell-focused treatment, this is being exponentially achieved. The kynurenine pathway, as an immunosuppressive apparatus, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1), as its main regulator, are yet to be exhaustively explored. This review presents the recognised role of IDO1 and its influence on the kynurenine pathway, with emphasis on immunosuppression in kidney transplant protection.