Endorectal Ultrasonography and Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Show Similar Diagnostic Accuracy in Local Staging of Rectal Cancer: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Management after local excision of small rectal cancers. Indications for completion total mesorectal excision and possible alternatives

The treatment of superficial rectal cancers (local excision, or proctectomy with total mesorectal excision (TME) remains controversial. Endoscopy and endorectal ultrasonography are essential for the precise initial definition of these small cancers. During endoscopy, the depth of the lesion can be estimated using virtual chromoendoscopy with magnification, thereby aiding the assessment of the possibilities of local excision. Current international recommendations indicate completion proctectomy after wide local excision for cases where the pathologic examination reveals poorly-differentiated lesions, lymphovascular invasion, grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and incomplete resection. But debate persists regarding whether the depth of submucosal invasion can accurately predict the risk of lymph node spread. Recent data from the literature suggest that the depth of submucosal invasion should no longer, by itself, be an indication for additional oncological surgery. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy could be an alternative to completion proctectomy in patients with pT1 rectal cancer and unfavorable histopathological criteria. A Dutch randomized controlled trial is underway to validate this strategy.

Diagnostic Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) of the Luminal Gastrointestinal Tract

The purpose of this review is to focus on the diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract. In the last decades, EUS has gained a central role in the staging of epithelial and sub-epithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. With the evolution of imaging, the position of EUS in the diagnostic work-up and the staging flow-chart has continuously changed with two extreme positions: some gastroenterologists think that EUS is absolutely indispensable, and some think it is utterly useless. The truth is, as always, somewhere in between the two extremes. Analyzing the most up-to-date and strong evidence, we will try to give EUS the correct position in our daily practice.

Early Rectal Cancer and Local Excision: A Narrative Review

A rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer consequent to bowel-screening programs around the world and an increase in the incidence in young adults has led to a growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options. The rectum, being the most distal portion of the large intestine, is a fertile ground for local excision techniques performed with endoscopic or surgical techniques. Moreover, the advancement in endoscopic optical evaluation and the better definition of imaging techniques allow for a more precise local staging of early rectal cancer. Although the local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients who could benefit from local excision techniques undergo total mesorectal excision (TME) as the first approach. All relevant prospective clinical trials were identified through a computer-assisted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases until January 2024. This review is dedicated to endoscopic and surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and highlights its possible role in current and future clinical practice, taking into account surgical completion techniques and chemoradiotherapy.

The importance of preoperative T3 stage substaging by 3D endorectal ultrasonography for the prognosis of middle and low rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to validate the role of 3D-endorectal ultrasonography in prognosis and recurrence for patients with T3-stage rectal cancer by evaluating the preoperative extramural depth of tumor invasion.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the medical records of rectal cancer patients who were admitted to Changhai Hospital's Colorectal Surgery Division. The sample group was categorized into three subgroups (T3a, T3b, and T3c) based on the extent of tumor progression (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, and >10 mm) to assess the endorectal ultrasonography diagnostic performance. The 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log rank test. Cox regression analysis verified the tumor invasion depth's significance as a prognostic predictor, and it was also utilized to evaluate other independent risk variables for recurrence after surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 72 individuals with low and middle rectal cancer from January 2014 to November 2019. Twenty-two individuals had stage T3a, 22 had stage T3b, and 28 had stage T3c based on preoperative endorectal ultrasonography. Endorectal ultrasonography had 88.0%, 86.8%, and 76.2% overall accuracy for stratifying subgroups, respectively. According to the Kaplan-Meier curve, 5-year OS was 100%, 83.5%, and 92.9% for T3a, T3b, and T3c (p = 0.172), and 5-year disease-free survival was 100%, 80.8%, and 72.9% for T3a, T3b, and T3c, respectively (p = 0.014). A distinct risk factor for 5-year disease-free survival was the degree of tumor infiltration (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative T3 stage subdivision allows for categorization of prognosis and survival. Endorectal ultrasonography reports should make explicit declarations of T3a, T3b, and T3c scales.

The Value of Transanal Normal Saline Infusion-Assisted Multipath Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of T1/T2 Rectal Cancer

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the application value of transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography (TNSI-MU) in the diagnosis of T1/T2 rectal cancer (RC). All patients first received single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography and then received 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, or transvaginal ultrasonography after TNSI to determine the T stage. With surgical pathology as the criterion standard, the detection rates of T1/T2 RC lesions and the T-staging results of single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography, TNSI-MU, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared and analyzed. T1/T2 RC was surgically and pathologically confirmed in 52 patients. Single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography had a lesion detection rate of 57.69% (30/52) and a T-staging accuracy of 80.0% (24/30), the sensitivity was 57.69%, and the specificity was 88.46%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had a lesion detection rate of 100%, and its T-staging accuracy was 84.62% (44/52), the sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 88.61%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had a significantly higher detection rate of T1/T2 RC lesions than single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography ( P < 0.001), but the 2 methods had similar T-staging accuracy for T1/T2 RC (χ 2 = 0.286, P = 0.593). Contrast-enhanced MRI had a lesion detection rate of 100% and a T-staging accuracy of 40.38% (21/52), the sensitivity was 98.07%, and the specificity was 61.54%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than contrast-enhanced MRI for T staging of T1/T2 RC ( P < 0.001), and the diagnostic results of the 2 methods were not consistent (κ = 0.151). Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography outperformed single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography in the detection rate of T1/T2 RC lesions and contrast-enhanced MRI in the staging accuracy for T1/T2 RC.

Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study

Purpose

To explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative analysis in the evaluation and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

Methods

Eighty-three consecutive patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for LARC were retrospectively included. According to pathological results, patients were categorized into complete or incomplete response groups. Differences in ultrasonic parameters, pathological results, and clinical data between groups were evaluated. The cutoff point for a complete response as determined by quantitative analysis of CEUS was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve; additionally, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

Results

Of the 83 patients, 12 (14.5%) achieved a complete response and 71 (85.5%) did not. There were significant between-group differences in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, differentiation degree, proportion of tumor occupying the lumen, anterior-posterior and superior-inferior diameters of the lesion, and intensity of enhancement (P<0.05). CEUS quantitative analysis showed significant between-group differences in peak intensity (PI) and area under the curve (AUC) values (P<0.05). The OS and PFS of patients with high PI, high AUC value, and poorly differentiated cancer were significantly worse than those with low PI, low AUC values, and moderately to highly differentiated cancer (P<0.05). High CEA levels (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.04; P=0.002) and low differentiation (2.72, 1.12-6.62; P=0.028) were independent risk factors for PFS and OS.

Conclusions

CEUS can predict the response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC. CEUS quantitative analysis is helpful for clinical prognosis.

Endorectal Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography of Complex Rectal Adenoma and Early Rectal Cancer

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic performance of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS), shear-wave elastography (SWE), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a complex rectal adenoma or an early rectal cancer, i.e., T1 or T2 adenocarcinoma in a clinical setting, and to evaluate the association between SWE and stromal fraction (SF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and SF. Method: This prospective study included patients undergoing ERUS and SWE for a rectal tumor subsequently confirmed by histopathology to be an adenoma or a T1 or T2 adenocarcinoma. The accuracy of the imaging methods was assessed by comparing the T category as determined by ERUS and MRI with histopathology, which served as the gold standard. SF was assessed on surgical specimens. Results: A total of 86 patients were included. Of these, 62 patients had adenomas and 24 patients had carcinomas, of which 11 were T1 tumors and 13 were T2 tumors. ERUS and MRI yielded sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.79 and 0.73, 0.95 and 0.90, and 0.86 and 0.78, respectively, for discrimination between benign and malignant lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for SWE was 0.88, and with a cut-off value of 40 kPa the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.79, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively. There was a positive correlation between SF and SWE with a p-value of <0.001 and a negative correlation between SF and ADC with a p-value of 0.011. Conclusion: Both ERUS and MRI classified T categories with a high accuracy; however, ERUS classified more adenomas correctly than MRI. In this small population, SWE could differentiate an adenoma from early carcinoma. SF was correlated with both SWE and ADC, as increasing SF tended to yield higher SWE and lower ADC values.