Chest X-ray in Emergency Radiology: What Artificial Intelligence Applications Are Available?

Anticipating impending peripheral intravenous catheter failure: A diagnostic accuracy observational study combining ultrasound and artificial intelligence to improve clinical care

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) failure occurs in approximately 50% of insertions. Unexpected PIVC failure leads to treatment delays, longer hospitalizations, and increased risk of patient harm. In current practice there is no method to predict if PIVC failure will occur until it is too late and a grossly obvious complication has occurred. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the diagnostic accuracy of a predictive model for PIVC failure based on artificial intelligence (AI).

METHODS

This study evaluated the capabilities of a novel machine learning algorithm. The algorithm was trained using real-world ultrasound videos of PIVC sites with a goal of predicting which PIVCs would fail within the following day. After training, AI models were validated using another, unseen, collection of real-world ultrasound videos of PIVC sites.

RESULTS

2133 ultrasound videos (361 failure and 1772 non-failure) were used for algorithm development. When the algorithm was tasked with predicting failure in the unseen collection of videos, the best achieved results were an accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.77, specificity of 0.98, positive predictive value of 0.91, negative predictive value of 0.93, and area under the curve of 0.87.

CONCLUSIONS

This proprietary and novel machine learning algorithm can accurately and reliably predict PIVC failure 1 day prior to clinically evident failure. Implementation of this technology in the patient care setting would provide timely information for clinicians to plan and manage impending device failure. Future research on the use of AI technology and PIVCs should focus on improving catheter function and longevity, while limiting complication rates.

ZooCNN: A Zero-Order Optimized Convolutional Neural Network for Pneumonia Classification Using Chest Radiographs

Pneumonia, a leading cause of mortality in children under five, is usually diagnosed through chest X-ray (CXR) images due to its efficiency and cost-effectiveness. However, the shortage of radiologists in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) emphasizes the need for automated pneumonia diagnostic systems. This article presents a Deep Learning model, Zero-Order Optimized Convolutional Neural Network (ZooCNN), a Zero-Order Optimization (Zoo)-based CNN model for classifying CXR images into three classes, Normal Lungs (NL), Bacterial Pneumonia (BP), and Viral Pneumonia (VP); this model utilizes the Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (ADASYN) approach to ensure class balance in the Kaggle CXR Images (Pneumonia) dataset. Conventional CNN models, though promising, face challenges such as overfitting and have high computational costs. The use of ZooPlatform (ZooPT), a hyperparameter finetuning strategy, on a baseline CNN model finetunes the hyperparameters and provides a modified architecture, ZooCNN, with a 72% reduction in weights. The model was trained, tested, and validated on the Kaggle CXR Images (Pneumonia) dataset. The ZooCNN achieved an accuracy of 97.27%, a sensitivity of 97.00%, a specificity of 98.60%, and an F1 score of 97.03%. The results were compared with contemporary models to highlight the efficacy of the ZooCNN in pneumonia classification (PC), offering a potential tool to aid physicians in clinical settings.

Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates

Background

Chest radiographs (CXRs) are widely used to screen for infectious diseases like tuberculosis and COVID-19 among migrants. At such high-volume settings, manual CXR reporting is challenging and integrating artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms into the workflow help to rule out normal findings in minutes, allowing radiologists to focus on abnormal cases.

Methods

In this post-deployment study, all the CXRs acquired during the visa screening process across 33 centers in United Arab Emirates from January 2021 to June 2022 (18 months) were included. The qXR v2.1 chest X-ray interpretation software was used to classify the scans into normal and abnormal, and its agreement against radiologist was evaluated. Additionally, a digital survey was conducted among 20 healthcare professionals with prior AI experience to understand real-world implementation challenges and impact.

Results

The analysis of 1309,443 CXRs from 1309,431 patients (median age: 35 years; IQR [29-42]; 1030,071 males [78.7 %]) in this study revealed a Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 99.92 % (95 % CI: 99.92, 99.93), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 5.06 % (95 % CI: 4.99, 5.13) and overall percent agreement of the AI with radiologists of 72.90 % (95 % CI: 72.82, 72.98). In the survey, majority (88.2 %) of the radiologists agreed to turnaround time reduction after AI integration, while 82 % suggested that the AI improved their diagnostic accuracy.

Discussion

In contrast with the existing studies, this research uses a substantially large data. A high NPV and satisfactory agreement with human readers indicate that AI can reliably identify normal CXRs, making it suitable for routine applications.

Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Chest Radiographs Referred from the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

The increasing integration of AI in chest X-ray evaluation holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and optimizing clinical workflows. However, understanding its performance in real-world clinical settings is essential.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of an AI-based software (Arterys MICA v29.4.0) alongside a radiology resident in interpreting chest X-rays referred from the emergency department (ED), using a senior radiologist's assessment as the gold standard (GS). We assessed the concordance between the AI system and the resident, noted the frequency of doubtful cases for each category, identified how many were considered positive by the GS, and assessed variables that AI was not trained to detect.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing chest X-rays from a sample of 784 patients referred from the ED at our hospital. The AI system was trained to detect five categorical variables-pulmonary nodule, pulmonary opacity, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and fracture-and assign each a confidence label ("positive", "doubtful", or "negative").

RESULTS

Sensitivity in detecting fractures and pneumothorax was high (100%) for both AI and the resident, moderate for pulmonary opacity (AI = 76%, resident = 71%), and acceptable for pleural effusion (AI = 60%, resident = 67%), with negative predictive values (NPV) above 95% and areas under the curve (AUC) exceeding 0.8. The resident showed moderate sensitivity (75%) for pulmonary nodules, while AI's sensitivity was low (33%). AI assigned a "doubtful" label to some diagnoses, most of which were deemed negative by the GS; the resident expressed doubt less frequently. The Kappa coefficient between the resident and AI was fair (0.3) across most categories, except for pleural effusion, where concordance was moderate (0.5). Our study highlighted additional findings not detected by AI, including 16% prevalence of mediastinal abnormalities, 20% surgical materials, and 20% other pulmonary findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AI demonstrated utility in identifying most primary findings-except for pulmonary nodules-its high NPV suggests it may be valuable for screening. Further training of the AI software and broadening its scope to identify additional findings could enhance its detection capabilities and increase its applicability in clinical practice.

XRAInet: AI-based decision support for pneumothorax and pleural effusion management

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and assess the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven decision support system, XRAInet, in accurately identifying pediatric patients with pleural effusion or pneumothorax and determining whether tube thoracostomy intervention is warranted.

METHODS

In this diagnostic accuracy study, we retrospectively analyzed a data set containing 510 X-ray images from 170 pediatric patients admitted between 2005 and 2022. Patients were categorized into two groups: Tube (requiring tube thoracostomy) and Conservative (managed conservatively). XRAInet, a deep learning-based algorithm, was trained using this data set. We evaluated its performance using various metrics, including mean Average Precision (mAP), recall, precision, and F1 score.

RESULTS

XRAInet, achieved a mAP score of 0.918. This result underscores its ability to accurately identify and localize regions necessitating tube thoracostomy for pediatric patients with pneumothorax and pleural effusion. In an independent testing data set, the model exhibited a sensitivity of 64.00% and specificity of 96.15%.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, XRAInet presents a promising solution for improving the detection and decision-making process for cases of pneumothorax and pleural effusion in pediatric patients using X-ray images. These findings contribute to the expanding field of AI-driven medical imaging, with potential applications for enhancing patient outcomes. Future research endeavors should explore hybrid models, enhance interpretability, address data quality issues, and align with regulatory requirements to ensure the safe and effective deployment of XRAInet in healthcare settings.

Factors for increasing positive predictive value of pneumothorax detection on chest radiographs using artificial intelligence

This study evaluated the positive predictive value (PPV) of artificial intelligence (AI) in detecting pneumothorax on chest radiographs (CXRs) and its affecting factors. Patients determined to have pneumothorax on CXR by a commercial AI software from March to December 2021 were included retrospectively. The PPV was evaluated according to the true-positive (TP) and false-positive (FP) diagnosis determined by radiologists. To know the factors that might influence the results, logistic regression with generalized estimating equation was used. Among a total of 87,658 CXRs, 308 CXRs with 331 pneumothoraces from 283 patients were finally included. The overall PPV of AI about pneumothorax was 41.1% (TF:FP = 136:195). The PA view (odds ratio [OR], 29.837; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.062-59.107), high abnormality score (OR, 1.081; 95% CI, 1.066-1.097), large amount of pneumothorax (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.003-1.007), presence of ipsilateral atelectasis (OR, 3.508; 95% CI, 1.509-8.156) and a small amount of ipsilateral pleural effusion (OR, 5.277; 95% CI, 2.55-10.919) had significant effects on the increasing PPV. Therefore, PPV for pneumothorax diagnosis using AI can vary based on patients' factors, image-acquisition protocols, and the presence of concurrent lesions on CXR.

AI-Driven Thoracic X-ray Diagnostics: Transformative Transfer Learning for Clinical Validation in Pulmonary Radiography

Our research evaluates advanced artificial (AI) methodologies to enhance diagnostic accuracy in pulmonary radiography. Utilizing DenseNet121 and ResNet50, we analyzed 108,948 chest X-ray images from 32,717 patients and DenseNet121 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 94% in identifying the conditions of pneumothorax and oedema. The model's performance surpassed that of expert radiologists, though further improvements are necessary for diagnosing complex conditions such as emphysema, effusion, and hernia. Clinical validation integrating Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Named Entity Recognition (NER) demonstrated the potential of natural language processing (NLP) in clinical workflows. The NER system achieved a precision of 92% and a recall of 88%. Sentiment analysis using DistilBERT provided a nuanced understanding of clinical notes, which is essential for refining diagnostic decisions. XGBoost and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) enhanced feature extraction and model interpretability. Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and occlusion sensitivity analysis further enriched transparency, enabling healthcare providers to trust AI predictions. These AI techniques reduced processing times by 60% and annotation errors by 75%, setting a new benchmark for efficiency in thoracic diagnostics. The research explored the transformative potential of AI in medical imaging, advancing traditional diagnostics and accelerating medical evaluations in clinical settings.

Hemi-diaphragm detection of chest X-ray images based on convolutional neural network and graphics

BACKGROUND

Chest X-rays (CXR) are widely used to facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of critically ill and emergency patients in clinical practice. Accurate hemi-diaphragm detection based on postero-anterior (P-A) CXR images is crucial for the diaphragm function assessment of critically ill and emergency patients to provide precision healthcare for these vulnerable populations.

OBJECTIVE

Therefore, an effective and accurate hemi-diaphragm detection method for P-A CXR images is urgently developed to assess these vulnerable populations' diaphragm function.

METHODS

Based on the above, this paper proposes an effective hemi-diaphragm detection method for P-A CXR images based on the convolutional neural network (CNN) and graphics. First, we develop a robust and standard CNN model of pathological lungs trained by human P-A CXR images of normal and abnormal cases with multiple lung diseases to extract lung fields from P-A CXR images. Second, we propose a novel localization method of the cardiophrenic angle based on the two-dimensional projection morphology of the left and right lungs by graphics for detecting the hemi-diaphragm.

RESULTS

The mean errors of the four key hemi-diaphragm points in the lung field mask images abstracted from static P-A CXR images based on five different segmentation models are 9.05, 7.19, 7.92, 7.27, and 6.73 pixels, respectively. Besides, the results also show that the mean errors of these four key hemi-diaphragm points in the lung field mask images abstracted from dynamic P-A CXR images based on these segmentation models are 5.50, 7.07, 4.43, 4.74, and 6.24 pixels,respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed hemi-diaphragm detection method can effectively perform hemi-diaphragm detection and may become an effective tool to assess these vulnerable populations' diaphragm function for precision healthcare.

Exploring the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Ultrasound

Breast ultrasound has emerged as a valuable imaging modality in the detection and characterization of breast lesions, particularly in women with dense breast tissue or contraindications for mammography. Within this framework, artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered significant attention for its potential to improve diagnostic accuracy in breast ultrasound and revolutionize the workflow. This review article aims to comprehensively explore the current state of research and development in harnessing AI's capabilities for breast ultrasound. We delve into various AI techniques, including machine learning, deep learning, as well as their applications in automating lesion detection, segmentation, and classification tasks. Furthermore, the review addresses the challenges and hurdles faced in implementing AI systems in breast ultrasound diagnostics, such as data privacy, interpretability, and regulatory approval. Ethical considerations pertaining to the integration of AI into clinical practice are also discussed, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a patient-centered approach. The integration of AI into breast ultrasound holds great promise for improving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing efficiency, and ultimately advancing patient's care. By examining the current state of research and identifying future opportunities, this review aims to contribute to the understanding and utilization of AI in breast ultrasound and encourage further interdisciplinary collaboration to maximize its potential in clinical practice.

AI-Based CXR First Reading: Current Limitations to Ensure Practical Value

We performed a multicenter external evaluation of the practical and clinical efficacy of a commercial AI algorithm for chest X-ray (CXR) analysis (Lunit INSIGHT CXR). A retrospective evaluation was performed with a multi-reader study. For a prospective evaluation, the AI model was run on CXR studies; the results were compared to the reports of 226 radiologists. In the multi-reader study, the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the AI were 0.94 (CI95%: 0.87-1.0), 0.9 (CI95%: 0.79-1.0), and 0.89 (CI95%: 0.79-0.98); the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the radiologists were 0.97 (CI95%: 0.94-1.0), 0.9 (CI95%: 0.79-1.0), and 0.95 (CI95%: 0.89-1.0). In most regions of the ROC curve, the AI performed a little worse or at the same level as an average human reader. The McNemar test showed no statistically significant differences between AI and radiologists. In the prospective study with 4752 cases, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the AI were 0.84 (CI95%: 0.82-0.86), 0.77 (CI95%: 0.73-0.80), and 0.81 (CI95%: 0.80-0.82). Lower accuracy values obtained during the prospective validation were mainly associated with false-positive findings considered by experts to be clinically insignificant and the false-negative omission of human-reported "opacity", "nodule", and calcification. In a large-scale prospective validation of the commercial AI algorithm in clinical practice, lower sensitivity and specificity values were obtained compared to the prior retrospective evaluation of the data of the same population.

Chest X-ray Interpretation: Detecting Devices and Device-Related Complications

This short review has the aim of helping the radiologist to identify medical devices when interpreting a chest X-ray, as well as looking for their most commonly detectable complications. Nowadays, many different medical devices are used, often together, especially in critical patients. It is important for the radiologist to know what to look for and to remember the technical factors that need to be considered when checking each device's positioning.