The Evolving Concept of the Multidisciplinary Approach in the Diagnosis and Management of Interstitial Lung Diseases

Current challenges in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Japan

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the archetypal interstitial lung disease. It is a chronic progressive condition that is challenging to manage as the clinical course of the disease is often difficult to predict. The prevalence of IPF is rising globally and in Japan, where it is estimated to affect 27 individuals per 100,000 of the population. Greater patient numbers and the poor prognosis associated with IPF diagnosis mean that there is a growing need for disease management approaches that can slow or even reverse disease progression and improve survival. Considerable progress has been made in recent years, with the approval of two antifibrotic therapies for IPF (pirfenidone and nintedanib), the availability of Japanese treatment guidelines, and the creation of global and Japanese disease registries. Despite this, significant unmet needs remain with respect to the diagnosis, treatment, and management of this complex disease. Each of these challenges will be discussed in this review, including making a timely and differential diagnosis of IPF, uptake and adherence to antifibrotic therapy, patient access to pulmonary rehabilitation, lung transplantation and palliative care, and optimal strategies for monitoring and staging disease progression, with a particular focus on the status in Japan. In addition, the review will reflect upon how ongoing research, clinical trials of novel therapies, and technologic advancements (including artificial intelligence, biomarkers, and genomic classification) may help address these challenges in the future.

Multidisciplinary Approach to the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias: Focus on the Pathologist's Key Role

Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias (IIPs) are a heterogeneous group of the broader category of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILDs), pathologically characterized by the distortion of lung parenchyma by interstitial inflammation and/or fibrosis. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the IIPs was published in 2002 and then updated in 2013, with the authors emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of IIPs. The histological evaluation of IIPs is challenging, and different types of IIPs are classically associated with specific histopathological patterns. However, morphological overlaps can be observed, and the same histopathological features can be seen in totally different clinical settings. Therefore, the pathologist's aim is to recognize the pathologic-morphologic pattern of disease in this clinical setting, and only after multi-disciplinary evaluation, if there is concordance between clinical and radiological findings, a definitive diagnosis of specific IIP can be established, allowing the optimal clinical-therapeutic management of the patient.

The association between patient preoperative disposition and outcomes after diagnostic lung biopsy

Background

Surgical diagnostic lung biopsy (DLB) is performed to guide the management of pulmonary disease with unclear etiology. However, the utilization of surgical DLB in critically ill patients remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient preoperative disposition impacts complication rates after DLB.

Methods

This was retrospective cohort study using electronic health record (EHR) data at one academic institution [2013-2021]. Patients who underwent DLB were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and cohorted based on preoperative disposition. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes were overall morbidity, individual complications, and changes to medical therapy. Complication rates were compared using chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to generate risk-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for each complication.

Results

Of 285 patients, 238 (83.5%) presented from home, 26 (9.1%) from inpatient floor units, and 21 (7.4%) from intensive care units (ICUs). Patients requiring ICU had the highest 30-day rates of mortality, overall morbidity, and all individual complications (all P<0.05). After risk adjustment, non-ICU inpatients had higher odds of postoperative ventilator use, prolonged ventilation, and ICU need than outpatients (all P<0.05). Preoperative ICU disposition was associated with increased OR of 30-day mortality [OR, 70.92; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.55-906.32] and overall morbidity (OR, 7.27; 95% CI: 1.93-27.42) compared to patients with other preoperative dispositions. There were no differences in changes to medical therapy between the cohorts.

Conclusions

Patients requiring ICU before DLB had significantly higher risk-adjusted rates of mortality and postoperative complications than outpatients and other inpatients. A clear benefit from tissue diagnosis should be defined prior to performing DLB on critically ill patients.

Factors influencing long-term outcomes in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) diagnosed through multidisciplinary discussion (MDD): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic process for fibrotic interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) is notably intricate, necessitating a multidisciplinary discussion to achieve consensus based on both clinical and radiological features. This study investigated the shared and distinctive long-term mortality predictors among the two primary phenotypes of F-ILD, namely idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD).

METHODS

We included patients with F-ILD diagnosed from December 2018 to December 2019 and conducted follow-up assessments until February 2023. Age, gender, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, gender-age-physiology (GAP) score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score, antifibrotic agent use, pulmonary function test parameters, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) parameters were recorded at baseline and used as mortality predictors in a multivariate Cox regression model.

RESULTS

We enrolled 104 ILD patients. The survival rate of non-IPF patients was more than twice that of IPF patients (78.9% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), and the survival rate of patients with a GAP score of 0-2 was more than twice that of patients with a score of > 2 (93.2% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001). Older age, male gender, definite UIP pattern, higher GAP score, higher mMRC dyspnea score, lower forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC), shorter 6MWT distance, and lower initial and final SpO2 were also associated with higher long-term mortality (p < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, only a GAP score of > 2 (hazard ratio [HR]:16.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.28-85.14; p = 0.001) and definite UIP pattern (HR: 4.08; 95% CI 1.07-15.5; p = 0.039) were significantly associated with overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

The long-term mortality rate of IPF patients was higher than that of CTD-ILD patients. The GAP score and UIP patterns were significant mortality predictors for both IPF and CTD-ILD patients.

Multidisciplinary-derived clinical score for accurate prediction of long-term mortality in fibrotic lung disease patients

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) stands out as one of the most aggressive forms of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), currently without a definitive cure. Multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is now considered a cornerstone in diagnosing and differentiating ILD subtypes. The Gender-Age-Physiology (GAP) score, developed to assess IPF prognosis based on sex, age, forced vital capacity, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), is limited in not considering dyspnea and functional impairment during the walking test. We proposed a MDD-based clinical score for mortality prediction among those patients.

METHODS

From December 2018 to December 2019, we enrolled ILD patients with IPF and non-IPF and followed-up them till December 2020. Based on DLCO, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale, and six-minute walking test (6MWT) distance, a functional score was developed for mortality prediction.

RESULTS

We enrolled 104 ILD patients, 12 (11.5%) died by the one-year follow-up. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, DLCO (% predicted) was the most accurate variable predicting one-year mortality with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-0.94), followed by mMRC Dyspnea Score (AUC = 0.82 [95% CI = 0.73-0.89]), 6MWT distance (AUC = 0.80 [95% CI = 0.71-0.88]), and GAP score (AUC = 0.77 [95% CI = 0.67-0.84]). Only the GAP score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.03-2.34, p = 0.0.37) and functional score (HR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.11-10.73, p = 0.032) were significantly associated with one-year mortality in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical score composite of DLCO, mMRC Dyspnea Scale, and 6MWT distance could provide an accurate prediction for long-term mortality in ILD patients, laying out a helpful tool for managing and following these patients.

Advances in Diagnostics and Management of Respiratory System Diseases

Recently, significant innovations in the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases have been developed [...].