Abrasion Behavior of Different Charcoal Toothpastes on Human Dentin When Using Electric Toothbrushes

The Gloss Retention of Esthetic Restorations Following Simulated Brushing with Charcoal Oral Products: An In-Vitro Study

AIM

To assess the gloss and gloss retention of two esthetic restorative materials after brushing with a charcoal-infused toothbrush and activated charcoal toothpaste compared to their standard counterparts in all possible combinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study,104 disc-shaped specimens were prepared, 52 from each of the two materials: Beautifil II LS composite resin (Giomer) and Fuji II LC resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Specimens of each material were divided into 4 groups (n = 13) according to the tested brushing procedure: group A-standard toothbrush + standard non-whitening toothpaste (S-S), group B-standard toothbrush + activated charcoal toothpaste (S-CH), group C-charcoal-infused toothbrush + standard non-whitening toothpaste (CH-S), and group D-charcoal-infused toothbrush + activated-charcoal toothpaste (CH-CH). Gloss was recorded using a gloss meter initially and after each brushing protocol. The data were statistically analyzed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post hoc tests using SPSS® v.27 software at 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Beautifil II LS showed the highest gloss values after brushing in group D (44 ± 3.9), which was not significantly different from its initial value (46.1 ± 1.8), followed by groups A (32.2 ± 4), B (23.2 ± 3.6), and C (22.7 ± 3.9), while Fuji II LC showed its highest gloss values after brushing in groups D (16.6 ± 3.7) and a (15.4 ± 8.7), followed by groups C (10.9 ± 6) and B (4.4 ± 2.5), all were significantly lower than their respective initial gloss values.

CONCLUSION

The gloss of Giomer and RMGI reduced significantly following the brushing with the tested brushing procedures except for the Giomer group brushed with a combination of charcoal-infused toothbrush and activated-charcoal toothpaste.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The brushing using a combination of charcoal-infused toothbrush and activated-charcoal toothpaste is recommended for the gloss retention of Beautifil II LS restorations. However, the gloss of the Fuji II LC cannot be retained after any of the brushing procedures. How to cite this article: Farghal NS, Awadalkreem F, Abouelhonoud NA, et al. The Gloss Retention of Esthetic Restorations Following Simulated Brushing with Charcoal Oral Products: An In-Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(5):473-479.

Thr in vitro Effect of Dentifrices With Activated Charcoal on Eroded Teeth

AIM

The objective of this research was to compare the abrasive potential of dentifrices containing activated charcoal with those of a conventional dentifrice on the development of erosive tooth wear (ETW) in vitro.

METHODS

Enamel and dentin samples were divided into toothpastes (n = 12): group (G)1-Colgate Triple Action (1450 ppm F) (positive control); G2-Colgate Natural Extracts (1450 ppm F); G3-Colgate Luminous White Activated Carbon (1450 ppm F); G4-Oral-B Whitening Therapy Charcoal (1100 ppm F); G5-Oral-B 3D White Mineral Clean (1100 ppm F); G6-Curaprox Black Is White (950 ppm F); and G7-erosion only (no abrasion, negative control). All samples were submitted to erosive pH cycles and G1 to G6 to abrasive challenges (15 seconds) using toothpastes' slurries plus 45 seconds of treatment for 7 days. The final profile was overlaid to the baseline one for the ETW calculation (µm). The data were subjected to analysis of variance/Tukey or Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn tests (P < .05).

RESULTS

Oral-B 3D White (13.0 ± 1.0, 9.37 [1.36] μm), Oral-B Whitening Therapy (15.1 ± 1.2, 8.58 [1.71] μm), and Colgate Luminous White (13.6 ± 1.0, 7.46 [0.94] μm) toothpastes promoted the greatest enamel and dentin wear. On the other hand, Colgate Triple Action (12.2 ± 1.2, 5.30 [1.26] μm), Colgate Natural Extracts (10.8 ± 1.1, 4.16 [1.11] μm), and Curaprox Black Is White (11.5 ± 1.5, 4.06 [0.92] μm) toothpastes promoted lower wear values, similar to erosion only (4.16 [0.94] μm) in the case of dentin but not enamel (7.1 ± 0.8 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

Toothpastes containing charcoal combined with pyrophosphate may have a high abrasive effect on eroded tooth surfaces. Many patients influenced by digital marketing use toothpastes containing activated charcoal with the aim of bleaching their teeth. However, care should be taken when using these products, as they may have a high abrasive effect.