Estimation of Time-Frequency Muscle Synergy in Wrist Movements

Muscle Synergy during Wrist Movements Based on Non-Negative Tucker Decomposition

Modular control of the muscle, which is called muscle synergy, simplifies control of the movement by the central nervous system. The purpose of this study was to explore the synergy in both the frequency and movement domains based on the non-negative Tucker decomposition (NTD) method. Surface electromyography (sEMG) data of 8 upper limb muscles in 10 healthy subjects under wrist flexion (WF) and wrist extension (WE) were recorded. NTD was selected for exploring the multi-domain muscle synergy from the sEMG data. The results showed two synergistic flexor pairs, Palmaris longus-Flexor Digitorum Superficialis (PL-FDS) and Extensor Carpi Radialis-Flexor Carpi Radialis (ECR-FCR), in the WF stage. Their spectral components are mainly in the respective bands 0-20 Hz and 25-50 Hz. And the spectral components of two extensor pairs, Extensor Digitorum-Extensor Carpi Ulnar (ED-ECU) and Extensor Carpi Radialis-Brachioradialis (ECR-B), are mainly in the respective bands 0-20 Hz and 7-45 Hz in the WE stage. Additionally, further analysis showed that the Biceps Brachii (BB) muscle was a shared muscle synergy module of the WE and WF stage, while the flexor muscles FCR, PL and FDS were the specific synergy modules of the WF stage, and the extensor muscles ED, ECU, ECR and B were the specific synergy modules of the WE stage. This study showed that NTD is a meaningful method to explore the multi-domain synergistic characteristics of multi-channel sEMG signals. The results can help us to better understand the frequency features of muscle synergy and shared and specific synergies, and expand the study perspective related to motor control in the nervous system.

A Review of EMG-, FMG-, and EIT-Based Biosensors and Relevant Human–Machine Interactivities and Biomedical Applications

Wearables developed for human body signal detection receive increasing attention in the current decade. Compared to implantable sensors, wearables are more focused on body motion detection, which can support human–machine interaction (HMI) and biomedical applications. In wearables, electromyography (EMG)-, force myography (FMG)-, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-based body information monitoring technologies are broadly presented. In the literature, all of them have been adopted for many similar application scenarios, which easily confuses researchers when they start to explore the area. Hence, in this article, we review the three technologies in detail, from basics including working principles, device architectures, interpretation algorithms, application examples, merits and drawbacks, to state-of-the-art works, challenges remaining to be solved and the outlook of the field. We believe the content in this paper could help readers create a whole image of designing and applying the three technologies in relevant scenarios.

Muscle Co-Contraction Detection in the Time-Frequency Domain

Background: Muscle co-contraction plays a significant role in motion control. Available detection methods typically only provide information in the time domain. The current investigation proposed a novel approach for muscle co-contraction detection in the time–frequency domain, based on continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Methods: In the current study, the CWT-based cross-energy localization of two surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals in the time–frequency domain, i.e., the CWT coscalogram, was adopted for the first time to characterize muscular co-contraction activity. A CWT-based denoising procedure was applied for removing noise from the sEMG signals. Algorithm performances were checked on synthetic and real sEMG signals, stratified for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and then validated against an approach based on the acknowledged double-threshold statistical algorithm (DT). Results: The CWT approach provided an accurate prediction of co-contraction timing in simulated and real datasets, minimally affected by SNR variability. The novel contribution consisted of providing the frequency values of each muscle co-contraction detected in the time domain, allowing us to reveal a wide variability in the frequency content between subjects and within stride. Conclusions: The CWT approach represents a relevant improvement over state-of-the-art approaches that provide only a numerical co-contraction index or, at best, dynamic information in the time domain. The robustness of the methodology and the physiological reliability of the experimental results support the suitability of this approach for clinical applications.