Production of Bioethanol from Carrot Pomace Using the Thermotolerant Yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus

Filamentous fungal pellets as versatile platforms for cell immobilization: developments to date and future perspectives

Filamentous fungi are well-known for their efficiency in producing valuable molecules of industrial significance, but applications of fungal biomass remain relatively less explored despite its abundant and diverse opportunities in biotechnology. One promising application of mycelial biomass is as a platform to immobilize different cell types such as animal, plant, and microbial cells. Filamentous fungal biomass with little to no treatment is a sustainable biomaterial which can also be food safe compared to other immobilization supports which may otherwise be synthetic or heavily processed. Because of these features, the fungal-cell combination can be tailored towards the targeted application and be applied in a variety of fields from bioremediation to biomedicine. Optimization efforts to improve cell loading on the mycelium has led to advancements both in the applied and basic sciences to understand the inter- and intra-kingdom interactions. This comprehensive review compiles for the first time the current state of the art of the immobilization of animal, yeast, microalgae, bacteria, and plant cells in filamentous fungal supports and presents outlook of applications in intensified fermentations, food and biofuel production, and wastewater treatment. Opportunities for further research and development were identified to include elucidation of the physical, chemical, and biological bases of the immobilization mechanisms and co-culture dynamics; expansion of the cell-fungus combinations investigated; exploration of previously unconsidered applications; and demonstration of scaled-up operations. It is concluded that the potential exists to leverage the unique qualities of filamentous fungus as a cellular support in the creation of novel materials and products in support of the circular bioeconomy.

Stress response and adaptation mechanisms in Kluyveromyces marxianus

Kluyveromyces marxianus is a non-Saccharomyces yeast that has gained importance due to its great potential to be used in the food and biotechnology industries. In general, K. marxianus is a known yeast for its ability to assimilate hexoses and pentoses; even this yeast can grow in disaccharides such as sucrose and lactose and polysaccharides such as agave fructans. Otherwise, K. marxianus is an excellent microorganism to produce metabolites of biotechnological interest, such as enzymes, ethanol, aroma compounds, organic acids, and single-cell proteins. However, several studies highlighted the metabolic trait variations among the K. marxianus strains, suggesting genetic diversity within the species that determines its metabolic functions; this diversity can be attributed to its high adaptation capacity against stressful environments. The outstanding metabolic characteristics of K. marxianus have motivated this yeast to be a study model to evaluate its easy adaptability to several environments. This chapter will discuss overview characteristics and applications of K. marxianus and recent insights into the stress response and adaptation mechanisms used by this non-Saccharomyces yeast.

Evaluation of thermotolerant and ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae as an alternative strain for bioethanol production from industrial feedstocks

Despite the fact that yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is by far the most commonly used in ethanol fermentation, few have been reported to be resistant to high ethanol concentrations at high temperatures. Hence, in this study, 150 S. cerevisiae strains from the Thailand Bioresource Research Center (TBRC) were screened for ethanol production based on their glucose utilization capability at high temperatures. Four strains, TBRC 12149, 12150, 12151, and 12153, exhibited the most outstanding ethanol production at high temperatures in shaking-flask culture. Among these, strain TBRC 12151 demonstrated a high ethanol tolerance of up to 12% at 40 °C. Compared to industrial and laboratory strains, TBRC 12149 displayed strong sucrose fermentation capacity whereas TBRC 12153 and 12151, respectively, showed the greatest ethanol production from molasses and cassava starch hydrolysate at high temperatures in shaking-flask conditions. In 5-L batch fermentation, similarly to both industrial strains, strain TBRC 12153 yielded an ethanol concentration of 66.5 g L-1 (58.4% theoretical yield) from molasses after 72 h at 40 °C. In contrast, strain TBRC12151 outperformed other industrial strains in cell growth and ethanol production from cassava starch hydrolysis at 40 °C with an ethanol production of 65 g L-1 (77.7% theoretical yield) after 72 h. Thus, the thermotolerant and ethanol-tolerant S. cerevisiae TBRC 12151 displayed great potential and possible uses as an alternative strain for industrial ethanol fermentation using cassava starch hydrolysate.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03436-4.

High-temperature ethanol fermentation from pineapple waste hydrolysate and gene expression analysis of thermotolerant yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

High-temperature ethanol fermentation by thermotolerant yeast is considered a promising technology for ethanol production, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. In this study, optimization conditions for high-temperature ethanol fermentation of pineapple waste hydrolysate (PWH) using a newly isolated thermotolerant yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae HG1.1, and the expression of genes during ethanol fermentation at 40 °C were carried out. Three independent variables, including cell concentration, pH, and yeast extract, positively affected ethanol production from PWH at 40 °C. The optimum levels of these significant factors evaluated using response surface methodology (RSM) based on central composite design (CCD) were a cell concentration of 8.0 × 10⁷ cells/mL, a pH of 5.5, and a yeast extract concentration of 4.95 g/L, yielding a maximum ethanol concentration of 36.85 g/L and productivity of 3.07 g/L. Gene expression analysis during high-temperature ethanol fermentation using RT-qPCR revealed that the acquisition of thermotolerance ability and ethanol fermentation efficiency of S. cerevisiae HG1.1 are associated with genes responsible for growth and ethanol stress, oxidative stress, acetic acid stress, DNA repair, the pyruvate-to-tricarboxylic acid (TCA) pathway, and the pyruvate-to-ethanol pathway.

Kluyveromyces marxianus: a potential biocatalyst of renewable chemicals and lignocellulosic ethanol production

Kluyveromyces marxianus is an ascomycetous yeast which has shown promising results in cellulosic ethanol and renewable chemicals production. It can survive on a variety of carbon sources under industrially favorable conditions due to its fast growth rate, thermotolerance, and acid tolerance. K. marxianus, is generally regarded as a safe (GRAS) microorganism, is widely recognized as a powerhouse for the production of heterologous proteins and is accepted by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) for its pharmaceutical and food applications. Since lignocellulosic hydrolysates are comprised of diverse monomeric sugars, oligosaccharides and potential metabolism inhibiting compounds, this microorganism can play a pivotal role as it can grow on lignocellulosic hydrolysates coping with vegetal cell wall derived inhibitors. Furthermore, advancements in synthetic biology, for example CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats with Cas9)-mediated genome editing, will enable development of an engineered yeast for the production of biochemicals and biopharmaceuticals having a myriad of industrial applications. Genetic engineering companies such as Cargill, Ginkgo Bioworks, DuPont, Global Yeast, Genomatica, and several others are actively working to develop designer yeasts. Given the important traits and properties of K. marxianus, these companies may find it to be a suitable biocatalyst for renewable chemicals and fuel production on the large scale. This paper reviews the recent progress made with K. marxianus biotechnology for sustainable production of ethanol, and other products utilizing lignocellulosic sugars.

The Influence of Apple, Carrot and Red Beet Pomace Content on the Properties of Pellet from Barley Straw

Influence of wastes generated during juice production: apple, carrot and red beet, added to barley straw, on density of pellet mass, pellet hardness, ash content and calorific value was assessed. Dry mass content of additives in the substrate to pellet production was: 0, 10, 20 and 30% of the mixture weight. The relative humidity of the raw material was: 17.0, 19.5 and 22%. Higher percentages of additives and higher moisture content in the raw materials increased the hardness and density of the pellet. The contents of natural polymers such as lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose were determined in primary materials used to prepare substrate and in pellet. Changes in the determination of these substances was observed as a result of the granulation process.

Kluyveromyces marxianus: Current State of Omics Studies, Strain Improvement Strategy and Potential Industrial Implementation

Bioethanol is considered an excellent alternative to fossil fuels, since it importantly contributes to the reduced consumption of crude oil, and to the alleviation of environmental pollution. Up to now, the baker yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most common eukaryotic microorganism used in ethanol production. The inability of S. cerevisiae to grow on pentoses, however, hinders its effective growth on plant biomass hydrolysates, which contain large amounts of C5 and C12 sugars. The industrial-scale bioprocessing requires high temperature bioreactors, diverse carbon sources, and the high titer production of volatile compounds. These criteria indicate that the search for alternative microbes possessing useful traits that meet the required standards of bioethanol production is necessary. Compared to other yeasts, Kluyveromyces marxianus has several advantages over others, e.g., it could grow on a broad spectrum of substrates (C5, C6 and C12 sugars); tolerate high temperature, toxins, and a wide range of pH values; and produce volatile short-chain ester. K. marxianus also shows a high ethanol production rate at high temperature and is a Crabtree-negative species. These attributes make K. marxianus promising as an industrial host for the biosynthesis of biofuels and other valuable chemicals.

Development of sustainable approaches for converting the organic waste to bioenergy

Dependence on fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are on alarming increase, thereby causing such resources to be in a depletion mode and a novel sustainable approach for bioenergy production are in demand. Successful implementation of zero waste discharge policy is one such way to attain a sustainable development of bioenergy. Zero waste discharge can be induced only through the conversion of organic wastes into bioenergy. Waste management is pivotal and considering its importance of minimizing the issue and menace of wastes, conversion strategy of organic waste is effectively recommended. Present review is concentrated on providing a keen view on the potential organic waste sources and the way in which the bioenergy is produced through efficient conversion processes. Biogas, bioethanol, biocoal, biohydrogen and biodiesel are the principal renewable energy sources. Different types of organic wastes used for bioenergy generation and its sources, anaerobic digestion-biogas production and its related process affecting parameters including fermentation, photosynthetic process and novel nano-inspired techniques are discussed. Bioenergy production from organic waste is associated with mitigation of lump waste generation and its dumping into land, specifically reducing all hazards and negativities in all sectors during waste disposal. A sustainable bioenergy sector with upgraded security for fuels, tackles the challenging climatic change problem also. Thus, intensification of organic waste conversion strategies to bioenergy, specially, biogas and biohydrogen production is elaborated and analyzed in the present article. Predominantly, persistent drawbacks of the existing organic waste conversion methods have been noted, providing consideration to economic, environmental and social development.

Production of Raw Starch-Digesting Amylolytic Preparation in Yarrowia lipolytica and Its Application in Biotechnological Synthesis of Lactic Acid and Ethanol

Sustainable economy drives increasing demand for raw biomass-decomposing enzymes. Microbial expression platforms exploited as cellular factories of such biocatalysts meet requirements of large-volume production. Previously, we developed Yarrowia lipolytica recombinant strains able to grow on raw starch of different plant origin. In the present study, we used the most efficient amylolytic strain as a microbial cell factory of raw-starch-digesting (RSD) amylolytic preparation composed of two enzymes. The RSD-preparation was produced in fed-batch bioreactor cultures. Concentrated and partly purified preparation was then tested in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) processes with thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus for ethanol production and Lactobacillus plantarum for production of lactic acid. These processes were conducted as a proof-of-concept that application of the novel RSD-preparation supports sufficient starch hydrolysis enabling microbial growth and production of targeted molecules, as the selected strains were confirmed to lack amylolytic activity. Doses of the preparation and thermal conditions were individually adjusted for the two processes. Additionally, ethanol production was tested under different aeration strategies; and lactic acid production process was tested in thermally pre-treated substrate, as well. Conducted studies demonstrated that the novel RSD-preparation provides satisfactory starch hydrolyzing activity for ethanol and lactic acid production from starch by non-amylolytic microorganisms.

Review on the Use of Diesel–Biodiesel–Alcohol Blends in Compression Ignition Engines

The use of alternative fuels contributes to the lowering of the carbon footprint of the internal combustion engine. Biofuels are the most important kinds of alternative fuels. Currently, thanks to the new manufacturing processes of biofuels, there is potential to decrease greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, compared to fossil fuels, on a well-to-wheel basis. Amongst the most prominent alternative fuels to be used in mixtures/blends with fossil fuels in internal combustion (IC) engines are biodiesel, bioethanol, and biomethanol. With this perspective, considerable attention has been given to biodiesel and petroleum diesel fuel blends in compression ignition (CI) engines. Many studies have been conducted to assess the impacts of biodiesel use on engine operation. The addition of alcohols such as methanol and ethanol is also practised in biodiesel–diesel blends, due to their miscibility with the pure biodiesel. Alcohols improve the physico-chemical properties of biodiesel–diesel blends, which lead to improved CI engine operation. This review paper discusses some results of recent studies on biodiesel, bioethanol, and biomethanol production, their physicochemical properties, and also, on the influence of the use of diesel–biodiesel–alcohols blends in CI engines: combustion characteristics, performance, and emissions.

Bioethanol production from raw sugar beet cossettes in horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor

Fossil fuels are still major energy sources, but the search for renewable energy sources has been encouraged. Bioethanol has been recognized as an alternative to fossil fuels and nowadays it represents more than 90% of the global biofuel production. Bioethanol production from raw sugar beet cossettes as a semi-solid substrate was studied. The study was carried out in the horizontal rotating tubular bioreactor (HRTB) with Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a microbial production strain. The impact of different combinations of HRTB operational parameters such as, rotation speed (5-15 min^-1), rotation type [constant or interval (3-15 min h^-1)] and working volume (ratio V _W/V _T = 0.2-0.7) on the bioethanol production was examined. In this study, the highest bioprocess efficiency parameters ([Formula: see text] = 0.47 g g^-1, E = 87.36% and Pr = 0.618 g L^-1 h^-1) were observed at 0.20 V _W/V _T, interval rotation of 12 min h^-1 and rotation speed of 15 min^-1. It has to be pointed out that bioethanol production efficiency in the HRTB was on the similar level as observed by bioethanol production from the raw sugar beet juice. Naturally present microorganisms of sugar beet could have a significant impact on bioethanol production. Higher yeast inoculation rate could reduce contaminant activities and, consequently, the bioethanol production efficiency would be improved.

Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review

Bioethanol has been identified as the mostly used biofuel worldwide since it significantly contributes to the reduction of crude oil consumption and environmental pollution. It can be produced from various types of feedstocks such as sucrose, starch, lignocellulosic and algal biomass through fermentation process by microorganisms. Compared to other types of microoganisms, yeasts especially Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the common microbes employed in ethanol production due to its high ethanol productivity, high ethanol tolerance and ability of fermenting wide range of sugars. However, there are some challenges in yeast fermentation which inhibit ethanol production such as high temperature, high ethanol concentration and the ability to ferment pentose sugars. Various types of yeast strains have been used in fermentation for ethanol production including hybrid, recombinant and wild-type yeasts. Yeasts can directly ferment simple sugars into ethanol while other type of feedstocks must be converted to fermentable sugars before it can be fermented to ethanol. The common processes involves in ethanol production are pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Production of bioethanol during fermentation depends on several factors such as temperature, sugar concentration, pH, fermentation time, agitation rate, and inoculum size. The efficiency and productivity of ethanol can be enhanced by immobilizing the yeast cells. This review highlights the different types of yeast strains, fermentation process, factors affecting bioethanol production and immobilization of yeasts for better bioethanol production.