Unveiling Variations: A Comprehensive Comparison of Five Globally Used Thyroid Cytology Reporting Systems With Histopathological Correlation

Introduction Accurate cytological assessment is pivotal for managing thyroid lesions and various global reporting systems are in use, such as the globally acclaimed The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), alongside other reporting systems namely, the Japanese Reporting System for Thyroid Aspiration Cytology (JRSTAC), Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC), the UK Royal College of Pathologists System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (UK RCPath), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Australian Society of Cytology Classification System (RCPA/ASC). Notably, variations exist among these systems which are influenced by country-specific statistics. Given the lack of large-scale data in India and the difference in prevalence of diagnostic entities compared to the western population, this study aimed to identify reporting systems suitable for the Indian population focusing on distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis of 40 thyroid cytology cases with histopathological correlation was conducted. Pathologists independently assessed cytology slides using JRSTAC, ICCRTC, RCPA/ASC, UK RCPath and TBSRTC. Five performance indicators, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of neoplastic conditions, negative predictive value (NPV) of non-neoplastic conditions, diagnostic accuracy and two quality indicators, percentage of Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and AUS/Malignant ratio were analyzed and compared. Results Among 40 cases, 22 cases were neoplastic (16 papillary thyroid carcinoma, six follicular adenoma) and 18 non-neoplastic (14 multinodular goiter, four lymphocytic thyroiditis). Specific patterns emerged in cases labeled "Non-diagnostic", prompted questions about categorizing inadequately cellular cases as "benign" in light of the presence of specific findings. All reporting systems showed 100% specificity in detecting non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions in Category 1 and Category 6 respectively. Performance and quality indicators varied among reporting systems with TBSRTC (PPV of neoplastic cases 85.71%, NPV of non-neoplastic cases 70.58%, specificity 85.7%, sensitivity 70.58%, diagnostic accuracy 60%, AUS percentage 22.5% and AUS/Malignant ratio 3%) and RCPA/ASC (PPV of neoplastic cases 76.47%, NPV of non-neoplastic cases 70.58%, specificity 75%, sensitivity 72.2%, diagnostic accuracy 62.5%, AUS percentage 15% and AUS/Malignant ratio 3%) showing better results. Conclusion Among the five thyroid cytology reporting systems studied, TBSRTC and RCPA/ASC showed better overall performance results and quality indicators were close to benchmark. Better performance by TBSRTC 2023 could be due to the detailed criterion mentioned per category with subcategorization of AUS and suspicious for malignancy by features of cytological and architectural atypia. Similarly, RCPA/ASC has subcategorized AUS with defined criteria and certain background features were included as an isolated criterion for the suspicious for malignancy category. These defined criteria outlined in TBSRTC and RCPA/ASC played a crucial role in minimizing and reclassifying cases from the indeterminate categories (AUS and suspicious for malignancy) into well-defined categories with established management protocols.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules (THYCOVID): a retrospective, international, multicentre, cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Since its outbreak in early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has diverted resources from non-urgent and elective procedures, leading to diagnosis and treatment delays, with an increased number of neoplasms at advanced stages worldwide. The aims of this study were to quantify the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic; and to evaluate whether delays in surgery led to an increased occurrence of aggressive tumours.

METHODS

In this retrospective, international, cross-sectional study, centres were invited to participate in June 22, 2022; each centre joining the study was asked to provide data from medical records on all surgical thyroidectomies consecutively performed from Jan 1, 2019, to Dec 31, 2021. Patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules were divided into three groups according to when they underwent surgery: from Jan 1, 2019, to Feb 29, 2020 (global prepandemic phase), from March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021 (pandemic escalation phase), and from June 1 to Dec 31, 2021 (pandemic decrease phase). The main outcomes were, for each phase, the number of surgeries for indeterminate thyroid nodules, and in patients with a postoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancers, the occurrence of tumours larger than 10 mm, extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastases, vascular invasion, distant metastases, and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence. Univariate analysis was used to compare the probability of aggressive thyroid features between the first and third study phases. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05178186.

FINDINGS

Data from 157 centres (n=49 countries) on 87 467 patients who underwent surgery for benign and malignant thyroid disease were collected, of whom 22 974 patients (18 052 [78·6%] female patients and 4922 [21·4%] male patients) received surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules. We observed a significant reduction in surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the pandemic escalation phase (median monthly surgeries per centre, 1·4 [IQR 0·6-3·4]) compared with the prepandemic phase (2·0 [0·9-3·7]; p<0·0001) and pandemic decrease phase (2·3 [1·0-5·0]; p<0·0001). Compared with the prepandemic phase, in the pandemic decrease phase we observed an increased occurrence of thyroid tumours larger than 10 mm (2554 [69·0%] of 3704 vs 1515 [71·5%] of 2119; OR 1·1 [95% CI 1·0-1·3]; p=0·042), lymph node metastases (343 [9·3%] vs 264 [12·5%]; OR 1·4 [1·2-1·7]; p=0·0001), and tumours at high risk of structural disease recurrence (203 [5·7%] of 3584 vs 155 [7·7%] of 2006; OR 1·4 [1·1-1·7]; p=0·0039).

INTERPRETATION

Our study suggests that the reduction in surgical activity for indeterminate thyroid nodules during the COVID-19 pandemic period could have led to an increased occurrence of aggressive thyroid tumours. However, other compelling hypotheses, including increased selection of patients with aggressive malignancies during this period, should be considered. We suggest that surgery for indeterminate thyroid nodules should no longer be postponed even in future instances of pandemic escalation.

FUNDING

None.

BRAFV600E mutation test on fine-needle aspiration specimens of thyroid nodules: Clinical correlations for 4600 patients

Background

The BRAF^V600E mutation is valuable for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, studies related to this mutation have involved only a small number of patients. Therefore, we performed a large‐scale analysis from a single institute to evaluate the accuracy of combined fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) and BRAF^V600E mutation tests for PTC diagnosis.

Methods

A total of 4600 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent both FNA cytology and BRAF^V600E mutation analysis on FNA specimens were enrolled. The association between the BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features was analyzed. A separate analysis was performed for the 311 patients who underwent repeated FNA for comparison of cytological evaluation and BRAF^V600E mutation results. The diagnostic efficacy of the BRAF^V600E mutation test and cytologic diagnoses was evaluated for 516 patients who underwent preoperative FNA tests in comparison with conclusive postoperative histopathologic results.

Results

The cytology results of all 4600 FNA samples were categorized according to The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) stages I–VI, which accounted for 11.76%, 60.02%, 6.46%, 3.61%, 6.71%, and 11.43% of the samples, respectively. The BRAF^V600E mutation was detected in 762 (16.57%) FNA samples, with rates of 1.48%, 0.87%, 20.20%, 3.01%, 66.02%, and 87.81% for TBSRTC I–VI lesions, respectively. Among the 311 repeat FNA cases, 81.0% of the BRAF^V600E‐positive and 4.3% of the BRAF^V600E‐negative specimens with an initial indication of cytological non‐malignancy were ultimately diagnosed as malignant by repeat FNA (p < 0.001). Among the 516 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, the sensitivity and specificity of the BRAF^V600E mutation test alone for PTC diagnosis were 76.71% and 100.0%, respectively, which increased to 96.62% and 88.03%, respectively, when combining the BRAF^V600E mutation test with cytology. BRAF^V600E mutation was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), but not with age, gender, or tumor size.

Conclusions

The BRAF^V600E mutation test in FNA samples has potential to reduce false negatives in PTC diagnosis, and therefore plays an important role in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules, especially those with an indeterminate or nondiagnostic cytology, which should be considered for repeat FNA.