1
|
Xu L, Xu J, Chen W, Xie L. Pressure-centric regulation for efficient anaerobic digestion: State-of-the-art, challenges and prospects. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY 2024; 413:131421. [PMID: 39233186 DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.131421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an environmentally friendly technology that simultaneously stabilizes biowaste and produces biogas. Conventional AD faces challenges such as inadequate substrate degradation and low methane purity. Pressure-centric regulation serves as an AD optimization strategy that can enhance the digestion efficiency and generate higher-energy-value biogas. However, limited reviews have been undertaken to focus on this technology. This review is designed to discuss innovations in ex-situ high-pressure pretreatment and in-situ high-pressure anaerobic digestion (HPAD) processes. Moreover, comprehensive understandings on the intrinsic mechanisms of HPAD are critically examined, including physicochemical reaction principles and microbial responses. The constraints currently curtailing these technologies and potential mitigation strategies are also scrutinized. Additionally, current knowledge gaps and future research directions on mechanisms, model fitting, and engineering practices are presented. Overall, this work highlights the feasibility of pressure-centric regulated AD and provides novel insights to overcome existing technical barriers in its application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Xu
- Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China
| | - Jun Xu
- Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China; Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, PR China
| | - Weizhen Chen
- Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China
| | - Li Xie
- Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, PR China; Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang L, Nie Y, Chen X, Xu J, Ji Z, Song W, Wei X, Song X, Wu XL. Biodegradation of Crude Oil by Nitrate-Reducing, Sulfate-Reducing, and Methanogenic Microbial Communities under High-Pressure Conditions. Microorganisms 2024; 12:1543. [PMID: 39203385 PMCID: PMC11356252 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12081543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is an important component in many national net-zero strategies, and ensuring that CO2 can be safely and economically stored in geological systems is critical. Recent discoveries have shown that microbial processes (e.g., methanogenesis) can modify fluid composition and fluid dynamics within the storage reservoir. Oil reservoirs are under high pressure, but the influence of pressure on the petroleum microbial community has been previously overlooked. To better understand microbial community dynamics in deep oil reservoirs, we designed an experiment to examine the effect of high pressure (12 megapascals [MPa], 60 °C) on nitrate-reducing, sulfate-reducing, and methanogenic enrichment cultures. Cultures were exposed to these conditions for 90 d and compared with a control exposed to atmospheric pressure (0.1 MPa, 60 °C). The degradation characteristic oil compounds were confirmed by thin-layer analysis of oil SARA (saturates, aromatics, resins, and asphaltenes) family component rods. We found that the asphaltene component in crude oil was biodegraded under high pressure, but the concentration of asphaltenes increased under atmospheric pressure. Gas chromatography analyses of saturates showed that short-chain saturates (C8-C12) were biodegraded under high and atmospheric pressure, especially in the methanogenic enrichment culture under high pressure (the ratio of change was -81%), resulting in an increased relative abundance of medium- and long-chain saturates. In the nitrate-reducing and sulfate-reducing enrichment cultures, long-chain saturates (C22-C32) were biodegraded in cultures exposed to high-pressure and anaerobic conditions, with a ratio of change of -8.0% and -2.3%, respectively. However, the relative proportion of long-chain saturates (C22-C32) increased under atmospheric pressure. Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry analyses of aromatics showed that several naphthalene series compounds (naphthalene, C1-naphthalene, and C2-naphthalene) were biodegraded in the sulfate-reducing enrichment under both atmospheric pressure and high pressure. Our study has discerned the linkages between the biodegradation characteristics of crude oil and pressures, which is important for the future application of bioenergy with CCUS (bio-CCUS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (X.C.); (Z.J.); (X.W.)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Yong Nie
- College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (Y.N.); (J.X.)
| | - Xinglong Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (X.C.); (Z.J.); (X.W.)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Jinbo Xu
- College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (Y.N.); (J.X.)
| | - Zemin Ji
- State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (X.C.); (Z.J.); (X.W.)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Wenfeng Song
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Xiaofang Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (X.C.); (Z.J.); (X.W.)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Xinmin Song
- State Key Laboratory of Enhanced Oil & Gas Recovery, Beijing 100083, China; (L.W.); (X.C.); (Z.J.); (X.W.)
- Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, China;
| | - Xiao-Lei Wu
- College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China; (Y.N.); (J.X.)
- Institute of Ecology, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Biofuels Production and Processing Technology. FERMENTATION 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/fermentation8070319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The negative global warming impact and global environmental pollution due to fossil fuels mean that the main challenge of modern society is finding alternatives to conventional fuels. In this scenario, biofuels derived from renewable biomass represent the most promising renewable energy sources. Depending on the biomass used by the fermentation technologies, it is possible obtain first-generation biofuels produced from food crops, second-generation biofuels produced from non-food feedstock, mainly starting from renewable lignocellulosic biomasses, and third-generation biofuels, represented by algae or food waste biomass. Although biofuels appear to be the closest alternative to fossil fuels, it is necessary for them to be produced in competitive quantities and costs, requiring both improvements to production technologies and diversification of feedstock. This Special Issue is focused on technological innovations, which include but are not limited to the utilization of different feedstock; different biomass pretreatments; fermentation strategies, such as simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) or separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF); different applied microorganisms used as monoculture or co-culture; and different setups for biofuel fermentation processes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Feasibility Study of Anaerobic Codigestion of Municipal Organic Waste in Moderately Pressurized Digesters: A Case for the Russian Federation. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12062933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising option to obtain renewable energy in the form of biogas and reduce the anthropogenic impact on the environment. In recent years there has been increasing interest in using pressurized digesters to improve the quality of biogas. However, maintaining high overpressure increases the requirements for the explosion safety of digesters. Consequently, there are natural limitations in the available technologies and facilities suitable for full-scale operation. In this work, we aimed to evaluate the possibility of using overpressure in the digester to improve the efficiency of codigestion of common municipal organic waste–sewage sludge and the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Three levels of moderate excess pressure (100, 150 and 200 kPa) were used to meet requirements of existing block-modular anaerobic bioreactors based on railway tanks, which are widely utilized for AD in the Russian Federation. There was no significant change in methane content in biogas (65% ± 3%) at different values of overpressure, hydraulic retention time (HRT) and organic loading rate (OLR). The maximum methane and energy production rates (2.365 L/(L·day) and 94.27 kJ/(L·day), respectively) were obtained at an overpressure of 200 kPa, HRT of 5 days and OLR of 14 kg VS/(m3·day). However, the maximum methane yield (202.44 mL/g VS), energy yield (8.07 kJ/g VS) and volatile solids (VS) removal (63.21%) were recorded at an overpressure of 150 kPa, HRT of 7 days and OLR of 10.4 kg VS/(m3·day). The pressured conditions showed better performance in terms of AD stability at high OLRs.
Collapse
|