Evaluation of Immersion and Spray Applications of Antimicrobial Treatments for Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni on Chicken Wings

Comparison of peroxyacetic acid and acidified sodium chlorite at reducing natural microbial contamination on chicken meat pieces

The spin-chill process at poultry processing plants involves the immersion of chicken carcasses in cold water (<5°C) often containing sodium hypochlorite which significantly contributes to the reduction of bacterial loads. Cutting carcasses into pieces, however, has been linked with increases in Campylobacter and Salmonella counts. Here, the efficacy of PAA and ASC on reducing bacteria on skin-on, bone-in thigh cuts was investigated. Three concentrations of ASC (60, 112, and 225 ppm) and PAA (50, 75, 100 ppm) were used. Thighs were dipped into sanitizer and tested for total viable bacterial counts, Campylobacter load, and prevalence of Salmonella. The efficacy of PAA and ASC was also compared with chlorine (8 ppm). All sanitizers exhibited a greater log reduction compared with water. PAA at both 75 and 100 ppm resulted in significantly higher log reductions compared with the water only. PAA at 100 ppm and 225 ppm ASC were the most effective at reducing Campylobacter. All wash treatments reduced the proportion of Salmonella positive samples, but the greatest reduction was observed for 225 ppm ASC. Both concentrations of ASC resulted in a greater reduction in total viable counts compared with chlorine.

The antimicrobial effects of mist spraying and immersion on beef samples with plasma-activated water

The use of plasma-activated water (PAW) as an antimicrobial agent to inactivate Salmonella Typhimurium on chilled beef during meat washing was evaluated. Two meat washing methods, spraying and immersion, were evaluated at contact times of 15, 30 and 60 s and meat storage times of 0, 1 and 7 days. The temperature of PAW was elevated to 55 °C for washing as it increased the microbial inactivation compared to ambient temperature. At the contact time of 60 s and meat storage time of 7 days, PAW spraying and immersion achieved 0.737-log₁₀ and 0.710-log₁₀ reductions against Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively; there were no significant differences between both washing methods, with spraying being preferred for commercial implementation. Compared to untreated and water-treated samples, meat washing with PAW alone improved the S. Typhimurium inactivation and did not cause negative impacts on the lightness and hue angle values, TBARS value, water holding capacity and pH. However, PAW reduced the redness, yellowness and chroma values with the decreased oxymyoglobin values of 44.1% at the storage time of 1 day. PAW spraying at 55 °C followed by additional water washing at 25 °C for 60 s achieved 0.696-log₁₀ reduction and mitigated a reduction in (i) the redness value, from 11.3 to 18.2, (ii) the yellowness value, from 9.19 to 11.1, and (iii) the chroma value, from 14.5 to 21.3, without displaying colour differences (∆E), as detected by human eyes, compared to water-treated samples. Moreover, the content of myoglobin forms was maintained by additional water washing.

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Spray Treatments in Reducing Salmonella enterica Populations on Chilled Pork

Studies reporting on alternative antimicrobial interventions for pathogen control on chilled pork carcasses and cuts are limited. In this study, the antimicrobial effects of various spray treatments against Salmonella enterica inoculated on skin-on pork samples were evaluated. Chilled pork jowls were portioned (10 by 5 by 1 cm) and inoculated, on the skin side, with a mixture of six S. enterica serotype strains to target levels of 6 to 7 log CFU/cm² (high inoculation level) or 3 to 4 log CFU/cm² (low inoculation level). Samples were then left nontreated (control) or were treated (10 s) using a laboratory-scale spray cabinet with water, formic acid (1.5%), a proprietary blend of sulfuric acid and sodium sulfate (SSS, pH 1.2), peroxyacetic acid (PAA, 400 ppm), or PAA (400 ppm) that was pH-adjusted (acidified) with acetic acid (1.5%), formic acid (1.5%), or SSS (pH 1.2). Samples (n = 6) were analyzed for Salmonella populations after treatment application (0 h) and after 24 h of refrigerated (4°C) storage. Irrespective of inoculation level, all spray treatments effectively reduced (P < 0.05) Salmonella levels immediately following their application. Overall, pathogen reductions for the chemical treatments, compared to the respective high and low inoculation level nontreated controls, ranged from 1.2 to 1.9 log CFU/cm² (high inoculation level) and 1.0 to 1.7 log CFU/cm² (low inoculation level). Acidification of PAA with acetic acid, formic acid, or SSS did not (P ≥ 0.05) enhance the initial bactericidal effects of the nonacidified PAA treatment. Salmonella populations recovered from all treated samples following 24 h of storage were, in general, similar (P ≥ 0.05) or up to 0.6 log CFU/cm² lower (P < 0.05) than those recovered from samples analyzed immediately after treatment application. The results of the study may be used by processing establishments to help identify effective decontamination interventions for reducing Salmonella contamination on pork.