1
|
Marlétaz F, Timoshevskaya N, Timoshevskiy V, Simakov O, Parey E, Gavriouchkina D, Suzuki M, Kubokawa K, Brenner S, Smith J, Rokhsar DS. The hagfish genome and the evolution of vertebrates. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.04.17.537254. [PMID: 37131617 PMCID: PMC10153176 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.17.537254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
As the only surviving lineages of jawless fishes, hagfishes and lampreys provide a critical window into early vertebrate evolution. Here, we investigate the complex history, timing, and functional role of genome-wide duplications in vertebrates in the light of a chromosome-scale genome of the brown hagfish Eptatretus atami. Using robust chromosome-scale (paralogon-based) phylogenetic methods, we confirm the monophyly of cyclostomes, document an auto-tetraploidization (1RV) that predated the origin of crown group vertebrates ~517 Mya, and establish the timing of subsequent independent duplications in the gnathostome and cyclostome lineages. Some 1RV gene duplications can be linked to key vertebrate innovations, suggesting that this early genomewide event contributed to the emergence of pan-vertebrate features such as neural crest. The hagfish karyotype is derived by numerous fusions relative to the ancestral cyclostome arrangement preserved by lampreys. These genomic changes were accompanied by the loss of genes essential for organ systems (eyes, osteoclast) that are absent in hagfish, accounting in part for the simplification of the hagfish body plan; other gene family expansions account for hagfishes' capacity to produce slime. Finally, we characterise programmed DNA elimination in somatic cells of hagfish, identifying protein-coding and repetitive elements that are deleted during development. As in lampreys, the elimination of these genes provides a mechanism for resolving genetic conflict between soma and germline by repressing germline/pluripotency functions. Reconstruction of the early genomic history of vertebrates provides a framework for further exploration of vertebrate novelties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Marlétaz
- Centre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
| | | | | | - Oleg Simakov
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
- Department of Molecular Evolution and Development, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elise Parey
- Centre for Life's Origins and Evolution, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daria Gavriouchkina
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
- Present address: UK Dementia Research Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Masakazu Suzuki
- Department of Science, Graduate School of Integrated Science and Technology, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kaoru Kubokawa
- Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sydney Brenner
- Comparative and Medical Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR, Biopolis, Singapore 138673, Singapore
- Deceased
| | - Jeramiah Smith
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Daniel S Rokhsar
- Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Timoshevskaya N, Eşkut KI, Timoshevskiy VA, Robb SMC, Holt C, Hess JE, Parker HJ, Baker CF, Miller AK, Saraceno C, Yandell M, Krumlauf R, Narum SR, Lampman RT, Gemmell NJ, Mountcastle J, Haase B, Balacco JR, Formenti G, Pelan S, Sims Y, Howe K, Fedrigo O, Jarvis ED, Smith JJ. An improved germline genome assembly for the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus illuminates the evolution of germline-specific chromosomes. Cell Rep 2023; 42:112263. [PMID: 36930644 PMCID: PMC10166183 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Programmed DNA loss is a gene silencing mechanism that is employed by several vertebrate and nonvertebrate lineages, including all living jawless vertebrates and songbirds. Reconstructing the evolution of somatically eliminated (germline-specific) sequences in these species has proven challenging due to a high content of repeats and gene duplications in eliminated sequences and a corresponding lack of highly accurate and contiguous assemblies for these regions. Here, we present an improved assembly of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome that was generated using recently standardized methods that increase the contiguity and accuracy of vertebrate genome assemblies. This assembly resolves highly contiguous, somatically retained chromosomes and at least one germline-specific chromosome, permitting new analyses that reconstruct the timing, mode, and repercussions of recruitment of genes to the germline-specific fraction. These analyses reveal major roles of interchromosomal segmental duplication, intrachromosomal duplication, and positive selection for germline functions in the long-term evolution of germline-specific chromosomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kaan I Eşkut
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | | | - Sofia M C Robb
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| | - Carson Holt
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Jon E Hess
- Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Portland, OR 97232, USA
| | - Hugo J Parker
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA
| | - Cindy F Baker
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Limited (NIWA), Hamilton, Waikato 3261, New Zealand
| | - Allison K Miller
- Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago 9054, New Zealand
| | - Cody Saraceno
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Mark Yandell
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Robb Krumlauf
- Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA; Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - Shawn R Narum
- Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, Hagerman, ID 83332, USA
| | - Ralph T Lampman
- Yakama Nation Fisheries Resource Management Program, Pacific Lamprey Project, Toppenish, WA 98948, USA
| | - Neil J Gemmell
- Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago 9054, New Zealand
| | | | - Bettina Haase
- Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jennifer R Balacco
- Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Giulio Formenti
- Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sarah Pelan
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Ying Sims
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Kerstin Howe
- Tree of Life, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Olivier Fedrigo
- Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Erich D Jarvis
- Vertebrate Genome Lab, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; Laboratory of Neurogenetics of Language, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA
| | - Jeramiah J Smith
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Raiyemo DA, Bobadilla LK, Tranel PJ. Genomic profiling of dioecious Amaranthus species provides novel insights into species relatedness and sex genes. BMC Biol 2023; 21:37. [PMID: 36804015 PMCID: PMC9940365 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01539-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amaranthus L. is a diverse genus consisting of domesticated, weedy, and non-invasive species distributed around the world. Nine species are dioecious, of which Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson and Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J.D. Sauer are troublesome weeds of agronomic crops in the USA and elsewhere. Shallow relationships among the dioecious Amaranthus species and the conservation of candidate genes within previously identified A. palmeri and A. tuberculatus male-specific regions of the Y (MSYs) in other dioecious species are poorly understood. In this study, seven genomes of dioecious amaranths were obtained by paired-end short-read sequencing and combined with short reads of seventeen species in the family Amaranthaceae from NCBI database. The species were phylogenomically analyzed to understand their relatedness. Genome characteristics for the dioecious species were evaluated and coverage analysis was used to investigate the conservation of sequences within the MSY regions. RESULTS We provide genome size, heterozygosity, and ploidy level inference for seven newly sequenced dioecious Amaranthus species and two additional dioecious species from the NCBI database. We report a pattern of transposable element proliferation in the species, in which seven species had more Ty3 elements than copia elements while A. palmeri and A. watsonii had more copia elements than Ty3 elements, similar to the TE pattern in some monoecious amaranths. Using a Mash-based phylogenomic analysis, we accurately recovered taxonomic relationships among the dioecious Amaranthus species that were previously identified based on comparative morphology. Coverage analysis revealed eleven candidate gene models within the A. palmeri MSY region with male-enriched coverages, as well as regions on scaffold 19 with female-enriched coverage, based on A. watsonii read alignments. A previously reported FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) within A. tuberculatus MSY contig was also found to exhibit male-enriched coverages for three species closely related to A. tuberculatus but not for A. watsonii reads. Additional characterization of the A. palmeri MSY region revealed that 78% of the region is made of repetitive elements, typical of a sex determination region with reduced recombination. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study further increase our understanding of the relationships among the dioecious species of the Amaranthus genus as well as revealed genes with potential roles in sex function in the species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damilola A Raiyemo
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Lucas K Bobadilla
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Patrick J Tranel
- Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pervasive male-biased expression throughout the germline-specific regions of the sea lamprey genome supports key roles in sex differentiation and spermatogenesis. Commun Biol 2022; 5:434. [PMID: 35538209 PMCID: PMC9090840 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03375-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Sea lamprey undergo programmed genome rearrangement (PGR) in which ∼20% of the genome is jettisoned from somatic cells during embryogenesis. Although the role of PGR in embryonic development has been studied, the role of the germline-specific region (GSR) in gonad development is unknown. We analysed RNA-sequence data from 28 sea lamprey gonads sampled across life-history stages, generated a genome-guided de novo superTranscriptome with annotations, and identified germline-specific genes (GSGs). Overall, we identified 638 GSGs that are enriched for reproductive processes and exhibit 36x greater odds of being expressed in testes than ovaries. Next, while 55% of the GSGs have putative somatic paralogs, the somatic paralogs are not differentially expressed between sexes. Further, putative orthologs of some the male-biased GSGs have known functions in sex determination or differentiation in other vertebrates. We conclude that the GSR of sea lamprey plays an important role in testicular differentiation and potentially sex determination. RNA-sequencing of sea lamprey gonads at different life-history stage identifies germline-specific genes which are highly expressed in males during spermatogenesis. This suggests a link between male-biased germline expression and sex differentiation in the sea lamprey.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kloc M, Kubiak JZ, Ghobrial RM. Natural genetic engineering: A programmed chromosome/DNA elimination. Dev Biol 2022; 486:15-25. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
6
|
Drotos KH, Zagoskin MV, Kess T, Gregory TR, Wyngaard GA. Throwing away DNA: programmed downsizing in somatic nuclei. Trends Genet 2022; 38:483-500. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Dedukh D, Krasikova A. Delete and survive: strategies of programmed genetic material elimination in eukaryotes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2022; 97:195-216. [PMID: 34542224 PMCID: PMC9292451 DOI: 10.1111/brv.12796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Genome stability is a crucial feature of eukaryotic organisms because its alteration drastically affects the normal development and survival of cells and the organism as a whole. Nevertheless, some organisms can selectively eliminate part of their genomes from certain cell types during specific stages of ontogenesis. This review aims to describe the phenomenon of programmed DNA elimination, which includes chromatin diminution (together with programmed genome rearrangement or DNA rearrangements), B and sex chromosome elimination, paternal genome elimination, parasitically induced genome elimination, and genome elimination in animal and plant hybrids. During programmed DNA elimination, individual chromosomal fragments, whole chromosomes, and even entire parental genomes can be selectively removed. Programmed DNA elimination occurs independently in different organisms, ranging from ciliate protozoa to mammals. Depending on the sequences destined for exclusion, programmed DNA elimination may serve as a radical mechanism of dosage compensation and inactivation of unnecessary or dangerous genetic entities. In hybrids, genome elimination results from competition between parental genomes. Despite the different consequences of DNA elimination, all genetic material destined for elimination must be first recognised, epigenetically marked, separated, and then removed and degraded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitrij Dedukh
- Saint‐Petersburg State University7/9 Universitetskaya EmbankmentSaint‐Petersburg199034Russia
| | - Alla Krasikova
- Saint‐Petersburg State University7/9 Universitetskaya EmbankmentSaint‐Petersburg199034Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Programmed DNA elimination: silencing genes and repetitive sequences in somatic cells. Biochem Soc Trans 2021; 49:1891-1903. [PMID: 34665225 DOI: 10.1042/bst20190951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
In a multicellular organism, the genomes of all cells are in general the same. Programmed DNA elimination is a notable exception to this genome constancy rule. DNA elimination removes genes and repetitive elements in the germline genome to form a reduced somatic genome in various organisms. The process of DNA elimination within an organism is highly accurate and reproducible; it typically occurs during early embryogenesis, coincident with germline-soma differentiation. DNA elimination provides a mechanism to silence selected genes and repeats in somatic cells. Recent studies in nematodes suggest that DNA elimination removes all chromosome ends, resolves sex chromosome fusions, and may also promote the birth of novel genes. Programmed DNA elimination processes are diverse among species, suggesting DNA elimination likely has evolved multiple times in different taxa. The growing list of organisms that undergo DNA elimination indicates that DNA elimination may be more widespread than previously appreciated. These various organisms will serve as complementary and comparative models to study the function, mechanism, and evolution of programmed DNA elimination in metazoans.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chromosome-Centric View of Genome Organization and Evolution. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12081237. [PMID: 34440411 PMCID: PMC8391126 DOI: 10.3390/genes12081237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic material in all cellular organisms is packed into chromosomes, which represent essential units of inheritance, recombination, and evolution [...].
Collapse
|
10
|
Hodson CN, Ross L. Evolutionary Perspectives on Germline-Restricted Chromosomes in Flies (Diptera). Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:evab072. [PMID: 33890671 PMCID: PMC8245193 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In some eukaryotes, germline soma differentiation involves elimination of parts of the genome from somatic cells. The portions of the genome restricted to the germline often contain genes that play a role in development and function of the germline. Lineages with germline-restricted DNA are taxonomically diverse, and the size of the germline-restricted genome varies substantially. Unfortunately, few of these lineages have been studied in detail. As a result, we understand little about the general evolutionary forces that drive the origin and maintenance of germline-restricted DNA. One of the taxonomic groups where germline-restricted DNA has been poorly studied are the flies (Diptera). In three Dipteran families, Chironomidae, Cecidomyiidae, and Sciaridae, entire chromosomes are eliminated from somatic cells early in embryonic development. Germline-restricted chromosomes are thought to have evolved independently in the Dipteran families and their size, number, and transmission patterns vary between families. Although there is a wealth of cytological studies on these chromosomes in flies, almost no genomic studies have been undertaken. As a result, very little is known about how and why they evolved and what genes they encode. This review summarizes the literature on germline-restricted chromosomes in Diptera, discusses hypotheses for their origin and function, and compares germline-restricted DNA in Diptera to other eukaryotes. Finally, we discuss why Dipteran lineages represent a promising system for the study of germline-restricted chromosomes and propose future avenues of research on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Hodson
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Ross
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Suh A, Dion-Côté AM. New Perspectives on the Evolution of Within-Individual Genome Variation and Germline/Soma Distinction. Genome Biol Evol 2021; 13:evab095. [PMID: 33963843 PMCID: PMC8245192 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomes can vary significantly even within the same individual. The underlying mechanisms are manifold, ranging from somatic mutation and recombination, development-associated ploidy changes and genetic bottlenecks, over to programmed DNA elimination during germline/soma differentiation. In this perspective piece, we briefly review recent developments in the study of within-individual genome variation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. We highlight a Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2020 virtual symposium entitled "Within-individual genome variation and germline/soma distinction" and the present Special Section of the same name in Genome Biology and Evolution, together fostering cross-taxon synergies in the field to identify and tackle key open questions in the understanding of within-individual genome variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Suh
- School of Biological Sciences—Organisms and the Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- Department of Organismal Biology—Systematic Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC), Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Over the last few decades, an increasing number of vertebrate taxa have been identified that undergo programmed genome rearrangement, or programmed DNA loss, during development. In these organisms, the genome of germ cells is often reproducibly different from the genome of all other cells within the body. Although we clearly have not identified all vertebrate taxa that undergo programmed genome loss, the list of species known to undergo loss now represents ∼10% of vertebrate species, including several basally diverging lineages. Recent studies have shed new light on the targets and mechanisms of DNA loss and their association with canonical modes of DNA silencing. Ultimately, expansion of these studies into a larger collection of taxa will aid in reconstructing patterns of shared/independent ancestry of programmed DNA loss in the vertebrate lineage, as well as more recent evolutionary events that have shaped the structure and content of eliminated DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeramiah J Smith
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA; , ,
| | | | - Cody Saraceno
- Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA; , ,
| |
Collapse
|