The Personalisation of Glioblastoma Treatment Using Whole Exome Sequencing: A Pilot Study

On the Boundary of Exploratory Genomics and Translation in Sequential Glioblastoma

OMICS methods brought significant advancements to the understanding of tumor cell biology, which transformed the treatment and prognosis of several cancers. Clinical practice and outcomes, however, changed significantly less in the case of glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, we aimed to assess the utility of whole exome (WES) sequencing in the clinical setting. Ten pairs of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) GBM specimens were obtained at onset (GBM-P) and at recurrence (GBM-R). Histopathological and molecular features of all samples supported the diagnosis of GBM based on WHO CNS5. WES data were filtered, applying a strict and custom-made pipeline, and occurrence of oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants in GBM-P, GBM-R or both were identified by using the VarSeq program version 2.5.0 (Golden Helix, Inc.). Characteristics and recurrence of the variants were analyzed in our own cohort and were also compared to those available in the COSMIC database. The lists of oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants corresponded to those identified in other studies. The average number of these variants were 4 and 5 out of all detected 24 and 34 variants in GBM-P and GBM-R samples, respectively. On average, one shared oncogenic/likely oncogenic variant was found in the pairs. We assessed the identified variants' therapeutic significance, also taking into consideration the guidelines by the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP). Our data support that a thorough WES analysis is suitable for identifying oncogenic and likely oncogenic variants in an individual clinical sample or a small cohort of FFPE glioma specimens, which concur with those of comprehensive research studies. Such analyses also allow us to monitor molecular dynamics of sequential GBM. In addition, careful evaluation of data according to the AMP guideline reveal that though therapeutic applicability of the variants is generally limited in the clinic, such information may be valuable in selected cases, and can support innovative preclinical and clinical trials.

Different states of stemness of glioblastoma stem cells sustain glioblastoma subtypes indicating novel clinical biomarkers and high-efficacy customized therapies

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant among gliomas with an inevitable lethal outcome. The elucidation of the physiology and regulation of this tumor is mandatory to unravel novel target and effective therapeutics. Emerging concepts show that the minor subset of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) accounts for tumorigenicity, representing the true target for innovative therapies in GBM.

METHODS

Here, we isolated and established functionally stable and steadily expanding GSCs lines from a large cohort of GBM patients. The molecular, functional and antigenic landscape of GBM tissues and their derivative GSCs was highlited in a side-by-side comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization by ANOVA and Fisher's exact tests. GSCs' physio-pathological hallmarks were delineated by comparing over time in vitro and in vivo their expansion, self-renewal and tumorigenic ability with hierarchical linear models for repeated measurements and Kaplan-Meier method. Candidate biomarkers performance in discriminating GBM patients' classification emerged by classification tree and patients' survival analysis.

RESULTS

Here, distinct biomarker signatures together with aberrant functional programs were shown to stratify GBM patients as well as their sibling GSCs population into TCGA clusters. Of importance, GSCs cells were demonstrated to fully resemble over time the molecular features of their patient of origin. Furthermore, we pointed out the existence of distinct GSCs subsets within GBM classification, inherently endowed with different self-renewal and tumorigenic potential. Particularly, classical GSCs were identified by more undifferentiated biological hallmarks, enhanced expansion and clonal capacity as compared to the more mature, relatively slow-propagating mesenchymal and proneural cells, likely endowed with a higher potential for infiltration either ex vivo or in vivo. Importantly, the combination of DCX and EGFR markers, selectively enriched among GSCs pools, almost exactly predicted GBM patients' clusters together with their survival and drug response.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we report that an inherent enrichment of distinct GSCs pools underpin the functional inter-cluster variances displayed by GBM patients. We uncover two selectively represented novel functional biomarkers capable of discriminating GBM patients' stratification, survival and drug response, setting the stage for the determination of patient-tailored diagnostic and prognostic strategies and, mostly, for the design of appropriate, patient-selective treatment protocols.

Clinical, pharmacological, and formulation evaluation of disulfiram in the treatment of glioblastoma - a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GB) is one of the most challenging central nervous system (CNS) tumors in treatment options and response, urging the development of novel management strategies. The anti-alcoholism drug, disulfiram (DS), has a potential anticancer activity, and its complex mechanism of action is assumed to be well exploited against the heterogeneous GB.

AREA COVERED

Through a systematic literature review about repositioning DS to GB treatment, an evaluation of the clinical, pharmacological, and formulation strategies is provided to specify the challenges of drug delivery and thus to advance its clinical translation. From six databases, 35 articles were selected, including case report (1); clinical trials (3); original articles mainly representing in vitro and preclinical pharmacological data, and 10 dealing with technological approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

The repositioning of DS in GB treatment is facing drug and tumor-associated limitations due to the oral drug's low bioavailability, unwanted metabolism, and inefficient delivery to brain-tumor tissue. Development strategies using molecular encapsulation of DS and the parenteral dosage forms improve the anticancer pharmacology of the drug. The development of optimized drug delivery systems (DDS) shows promise for the clinical translation of DS into GB adjuvant therapy.