1
|
Ito M, Fujita Y, Shinohara A. Positive and negative regulators of RAD51/DMC1 in homologous recombination and DNA replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 134:103613. [PMID: 38142595 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
RAD51 recombinase plays a central role in homologous recombination (HR) by forming a nucleoprotein filament on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to catalyze homology search and strand exchange between the ssDNA and a homologous double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The catalytic activity of RAD51 assembled on ssDNA is critical for the DNA-homology-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks in somatic and meiotic cells and restarting stalled replication forks during DNA replication. The RAD51-ssDNA complex also plays a structural role in protecting the regressed/reversed replication fork. Two types of regulators control RAD51 filament formation, stability, and dynamics, namely positive regulators, including mediators, and negative regulators, so-called remodelers. The appropriate balance of action by the two regulators assures genome stability. This review describes the roles of positive and negative RAD51 regulators in HR and DNA replication and its meiosis-specific homolog DMC1 in meiotic recombination. We also provide future study directions for a comprehensive understanding of RAD51/DMC1-mediated regulation in maintaining and inheriting genome integrity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaru Ito
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 3-2, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Yurika Fujita
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 3-2, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
| | - Akira Shinohara
- Institute for Protein Research, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 3-2, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu R, Pan Z, Nakagawa T. Gross Chromosomal Rearrangement at Centromeres. Biomolecules 2023; 14:28. [PMID: 38254628 PMCID: PMC10813616 DOI: 10.3390/biom14010028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Centromeres play essential roles in the faithful segregation of chromosomes. CENP-A, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, and heterochromatin characterized by di- or tri-methylation of histone H3 9th lysine (H3K9) are the hallmarks of centromere chromatin. Contrary to the epigenetic marks, DNA sequences underlying the centromere region of chromosomes are not well conserved through evolution. However, centromeres consist of repetitive sequences in many eukaryotes, including animals, plants, and a subset of fungi, including fission yeast. Advances in long-read sequencing techniques have uncovered the complete sequence of human centromeres containing more than thousands of alpha satellite repeats and other types of repetitive sequences. Not only tandem but also inverted repeats are present at a centromere. DNA recombination between centromere repeats can result in gross chromosomal rearrangement (GCR), such as translocation and isochromosome formation. CENP-A chromatin and heterochromatin suppress the centromeric GCR. The key player of homologous recombination, Rad51, safeguards centromere integrity through conservative noncrossover recombination between centromere repeats. In contrast to Rad51-dependent recombination, Rad52-mediated single-strand annealing (SSA) and microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) lead to centromeric GCR. This review summarizes recent findings on the role of centromere and recombination proteins in maintaining centromere integrity and discusses how GCR occurs at centromeres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Xu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
- Forefront Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ziyi Pan
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
- Forefront Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuro Nakagawa
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
- Forefront Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka 560-0043, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Bragança S, Dillingham MS, Moreno-Herrero F. Recent insights into eukaryotic double-strand DNA break repair unveiled by single-molecule methods. Trends Genet 2023; 39:924-940. [PMID: 37806853 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Genome integrity and maintenance are essential for the viability of all organisms. A wide variety of DNA damage types have been described, but double-strand breaks (DSBs) stand out as one of the most toxic DNA lesions. Two major pathways account for the repair of DSBs: homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Both pathways involve complex DNA transactions catalyzed by proteins that sequentially or cooperatively work to repair the damage. Single-molecule methods allow visualization of these complex transactions and characterization of the protein:DNA intermediates of DNA repair, ultimately allowing a comprehensive breakdown of the mechanisms underlying each pathway. We review current understanding of the HR and NHEJ responses to DSBs in eukaryotic cells, with a particular emphasis on recent advances through the use of single-molecule techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara De Bragança
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mark S Dillingham
- DNA:Protein Interactions Unit, School of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
| | - Fernando Moreno-Herrero
- Department of Macromolecular Structures, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Watson AJ, Shaffer ML, Bouley RA, Petreaca RC. F-box DNA Helicase 1 (FBH1) Contributes to the Destabilization of DNA Damage Repair Machinery in Human Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4439. [PMID: 37760409 PMCID: PMC10526855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination (HR) is the major mechanism of rescue of stalled replication forks or repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) during S phase or mitosis. In human cells, HR is facilitated by the BRCA2-BRCA1-PALB2 module, which loads the RAD51 recombinase onto a resected single-stranded DNA end to initiate repair. Although the process is essential for error-free repair, unrestrained HR can cause chromosomal rearrangements and genome instability. F-box DNA Helicase 1 (FBH1) antagonizes the role of BRCA2-BRCA1-PALB2 to restrict hyper-recombination and prevent genome instability. Here, we analyzed reported FBH1 mutations in cancer cells using the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancers (COSMIC) to understand how they interact with the BRCA2-BRCA1-PALB2. Consistent with previous results from yeast, we find that FBH1 mutations co-occur with BRCA2 mutations and to some degree BRCA1 and PALB2. We also describe some co-occurring mutations with RAD52, the accessory RAD51 loader and facilitator of single-strand annealing, which is independent of RAD51. In silico modeling was used to investigate the role of key FBH1 mutations on protein function, and a Q650K mutation was found to destabilize the protein structure. Taken together, this work highlights how mutations in several DNA damage repair genes contribute to cellular transformation and immortalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alizhah J. Watson
- Biology Program, The Ohio State University, Marion, OH 433023, USA; (A.J.W.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Michaela L. Shaffer
- Biology Program, The Ohio State University, Marion, OH 433023, USA; (A.J.W.); (M.L.S.)
| | - Renee A. Bouley
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Marion, OH 43302, USA
| | - Ruben C. Petreaca
- Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, Marion, OH 43302, USA
- Cancer Biology Program, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pavlova G, Belyashova A, Savchenko E, Panteleev D, Shamadykova D, Nikolaeva A, Pavlova S, Revishchin A, Golbin D, Potapov A, Antipina N, Golanov A. Reparative properties of human glioblastoma cells after single exposure to a wide range of X-ray doses. Front Oncol 2022; 12:912741. [PMID: 35992802 PMCID: PMC9386365 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.912741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy induces double-stranded DNA breaks in tumor cells, which leads to their death. A fraction of glioblastoma cells repair such breaks and reinitiate tumor growth. It was necessary to identify the relationship between high radiation doses and the proliferative activity of glioblastoma cells, and to evaluate the contribution of DNA repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR), and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) to tumor-cell recovery. We demonstrated that the GO1 culture derived from glioblastoma cells from Patient G, who had previously been irradiated, proved to be less sensitive to radiation than the Sus\fP2 glioblastoma culture was from Patient S, who had not been exposed to radiation before. GO1 cell proliferation decreased with radiation dose, and MTT decreased to 35% after a single exposure to 125 Gγ. The proliferative potential of glioblastoma culture Sus\fP2 decreased to 35% after exposure to 5 Gγ. At low radiation doses, cell proliferation and the expression of RAD51 were decreased; at high doses, cell proliferation was correlated with Ku70 protein expression. Therefore, HR and NHEJ are involved in DNA break repair after exposure to different radiation doses. Low doses induce HR, while higher doses induce the faster but less accurate NHEJ pathway of double-stranded DNA break repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galina Pavlova
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Genetics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- *Correspondence: Galina Pavlova,
| | - Alexandra Belyashova
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Savchenko
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitri Panteleev
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dzhirgala Shamadykova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Nikolaeva
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Pavlova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Revishchin
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis Golbin
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Potapov
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia Antipina
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| | - Andrey Golanov
- Nikolay Nilovich (N.N.) Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery (NMRCN), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|