Update on Molecular Diagnostics in Thyroid Pathology: A Review

Biomarkers in Thyroid Cancer: Emerging Opportunities from Non-Coding RNAs and Mitochondrial Space

Thyroid cancer diagnosis primarily relies on imaging techniques and cytological analyses. In cases where the diagnosis is uncertain, the quantification of molecular markers has been incorporated after cytological examination. This approach helps physicians to make surgical decisions, estimate cancer aggressiveness, and monitor the response to treatments. Despite the availability of commercial molecular tests, their widespread use has been hindered in our experience due to cost constraints and variability between them. Thus, numerous groups are currently evaluating new molecular markers that ultimately will lead to improved diagnostic certainty, as well as better classification of prognosis and recurrence. In this review, we start reviewing the current preoperative testing methodologies, followed by a comprehensive review of emerging molecular markers. We focus on micro RNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and mitochondrial (mt) signatures, including mtDNA genes and circulating cell-free mtDNA. We envision that a robust set of molecular markers will complement the national and international clinical guides for proper assessment of the disease.

Molecular Profiling for Bethesda III to VI Nodules: Results of a Multicenter International Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Molecular testing is a well-established tool that assists in the management of thyroid nodules. We describe our experience using molecular testing of thyroid nodules with Bethesda III to VI cytology.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter, multinational study of thyroid nodules that underwent preoperative molecular profiling with ThyGenX/ThyGeNEXT or ThyroSeq V3 between 2015 and 2022. The clinical characteristics and mutational profiles of tumors were compared. Collected data included demographics, cytology results, surgical pathology, and molecular alterations. Molecular alterations were categorized into 3 main phenotypes: BRAF-like, RAS-like, and non-BRAF-non-RAS (NBNR).

RESULTS

Overall, 784 patients who had surgery were included, of which 603 (76.2%) were females. The most common histologic type was papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with 727 (91.9%) cases. In total, 205 (28.2%) cases showed an aggressive subtype of PTC (eg, tall cell and hobnail). BRAF-like alterations were most likely to be found in Bethesda V and VI nodules and show extrathyroidal extension (ETE), nodal disease, and/or aggressive subtypes of PTC (P < .001 for all). RAS-like alterations were more commonly found in Bethesda III and IV nodules and were less likely to show ETE, nodal disease, and/or aggressive histology (P < .001 for all). NBNR alterations were more commonly found in Bethesda III and IV nodules and were less likely to show ETE, nodal disease, and/or aggressive subtypes of PTC. However, they were rarely but significantly associated with poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (P < .005).

CONCLUSION

Molecular testing of thyroid nodules can help determine the likelihood of malignancy and classify nodules into several tumor phenotypes, predicting their behaviors and potentially allowing for a more tailored treatment. NBNR alterations should be managed with caution.

[Possibilities of the personalized approach to solitary thyroid nodules based on molecular profiling]

BACKGROUND

Molecular profiling is currently not yet widespread in Germany and its potential for personalized treatment of solitary thyroid nodules is not exhausted.

METHOD

Narrative assessment of the available options and their evidence based on the current international literature as well as discussion of the options in the German context from the perspective of a thyroid surgeon and a thyroid pathologist.

RESULTS

The commercial tests available, especially in the USA, for molecular profiling of thyroid nodules offer good rule-in and somewhat poorer rule-out options, as many differentiated thyroid carcinomas do not display genetic alterations. The costs of these tests and molecular pathology for nodule assessment are still high and the individual mutations have not yet been clearly characterized.

CONCLUSION

It can be assumed that molecular profiling will become more important in the coming years and find its way into the clinical routine. At this point in time, however, there is not yet sufficient evidence of the clinical significance of most mutations in thyroid carcinomas to derive therapeutic consequences from them.

Autoimmune Thyroid Disease and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Review of the Mechanisms That Explain an Intriguing and Exciting Relationship

Autoimmune thyroid disease is a complex and highly frequent disease, where a wide variety of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors (among others) come together and interact, and is characterized by the presence of two clinical outcomes: hypothyroidism (in Hashimoto's thyroiditis) and hyperthyroidism (in Graves-Basedow disease). For its part, differentiated thyroid carcinoma (mainly papillary carcinoma) is the most common type of cancer affecting the thyroid (and one of the most prevalent worldwide). An important co-occurrence between autoimmune thyroid disease and differentiated thyroid carcinoma has been documented. In this article, studies that have evaluated possible associations and relationships between autoimmune thyroid disease and differentiated thyroid cancer are systematically described and summarized. To date, the underlying mechanism that explains this association is inflammation; however, the characteristics and designs of the studies evaluated do not yet allow a causal relationship between the two entities to be established. These aspects have made it difficult to establish "causality" in the continuum of the pathogenesis between both conditions.

Integrated Diagnostics of Thyroid Nodules

Thyroid nodules are common findings, particularly in iodine-deficient regions. Our paper aims to revise different diagnostic tools available in clinical thyroidology and propose their rational integration. We will elaborate on the pros and cons of thyroid ultrasound (US) and its scoring systems, thyroid scintigraphy, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), molecular imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI). Ultrasonographic scoring systems can help differentiate between benign and malignant nodules. Depending on the constellation or number of suspicious ultrasound features, a FNAC is recommended. However, hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules are presumed to exclude malignancy with a very high negative predictive value (NPV). Particularly in regions where iodine supply is low, most hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules are seen in patients with normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels. Thyroid scintigraphy is essential for the detection of these nodules. Among non-toxic thyroid nodules, a careful application of US risk stratification systems is pivotal to exclude inappropriate FNAC and guide the procedure on suspicious ones. However, almost one-third of cytology examinations are rendered as indeterminate, requiring "diagnostic surgery" to provide a definitive diagnosis. 99mTc-methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile ([99mTc]Tc-MIBI) and [18F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose ([18F]FDG) molecular imaging can spare those patients from unnecessary surgeries. The clinical value of AI in the evaluation of thyroid nodules needs to be determined.