Primetime for Learning Genes

Synaptic Mechanisms of Delay Eyeblink Classical Conditioning: AMPAR Trafficking and Gene Regulation in an In Vitro Model

An in vitro model of delay eyeblink classical conditioning was developed to investigate synaptic plasticity mechanisms underlying acquisition of associative learning. This was achieved by replacing real stimuli, such as an airpuff and tone, with patterned stimulation of the cranial nerves using an isolated brainstem preparation from turtle. Here, our primary findings regarding cellular and molecular mechanisms for learning acquisition using this unique approach are reviewed. The neural correlate of the in vitro eyeblink response is a replica of the actual behavior, and features of conditioned responses (CRs) resemble those observed in behavioral studies. Importantly, it was shown that acquisition of CRs did not require the intact cerebellum, but the appropriate timing did. Studies of synaptic mechanisms indicate that conditioning involves two stages of AMPA receptor (AMPAR) trafficking. Initially, GluA1-containing AMPARs are targeted to synapses followed later by replacement by GluA4 subunits that support CR expression. This two-stage process is regulated by specific signal transduction cascades involving PKA and PKC and is guided by distinct protein chaperones. The expression of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein is central to AMPAR trafficking and conditioning. BDNF gene expression is regulated by coordinated epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA methylation/demethylation and chromatin modifications that control access of promoters to transcription factors. Finally, a hypothesis is proposed that learning genes like BDNF are poised by dual chromatin features that allow rapid activation or repression in response to environmental stimuli. These in vitro studies have advanced our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie associative learning.

Emergence of In Vitro Preparations and Their Contribution to Understanding the Neural Control of Behavior in Vertebrates

One of the longstanding goals of the field of neuroscience is to understand the neural control of behavior in both invertebrate and vertebrate species. A series of early discoveries showed that certain motor patterns like locomotion could be generated by neuronal circuits without sensory feedback or descending control systems. These were called fictitious, or "fictive", motor programs because they could be expressed by neurons in the absence of movement. This finding lead investigators to isolate central nervous system tissue and maintain it in a dish in vitro to better study mechanisms of motor pattern generation. A period of rapid development of in vitro preparations from invertebrate species that could generate fictive motor programs from the activity of central pattern generating circuits (CPGs) emerged that was gradually followed by the introduction of such preparations from vertebrates. Here, I will review some of the notable in vitropreparations from both mammalian and non-mammalian vertebrate species developed to study the neural circuits underlying a variety of complex behaviors. This approach has been instrumental in delineating not only the cellular substrates underlying locomotion, respiration, scratching, and other behaviors, but also mechanisms underlying the modifiability of motor pathways through synaptic plasticity. In vitro preparations have had a significant impact on the field of motor systems neuroscience and the expansion of our understanding of how nervous systems control behavior. The field is ready for further advancement of this approach to explore neural substrates for variations in behavior generated by social and seasonal context, and the environment.

Regulation of AMPAR trafficking in synaptic plasticity by BDNF and the impact of neurodegenerative disease

Research demonstrates that the neural mechanisms underlying synaptic plasticity and learning and memory involve mobilization of AMPA-type neurotransmitter receptors at glutamatergic synaptic contacts, and that these mechanisms are targeted during neurodegenerative disease. Strengthening neural transmission occurs with insertion of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) into synapses while weakening results from receptor withdrawal. A key player in the trafficking of AMPARs during plasticity and learning is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) signaling system. BDNF is a neurotrophic factor that supports neuronal growth and is required for learning and memory. Significantly, a primary feature of many neurodegenerative diseases is a reduction in BDNF protein as well as disrupted neuronal surface expression of synaptic AMPARs. The resulting weakening of synaptic contacts leads to synapse loss and neuronal degeneration that underlies the cognitive impairment and dementia observed in patients with progressive neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer's. In the face of these data, one therapeutic approach is to increase BDNF bioavailability in brain. While this has been met with significant challenges, the results of the research have been promising. In spite of this, there are currently no clinical trials to test many of these findings on patients. Here, research showing that BDNF drives AMPARs to synapses, AMPAR trafficking is essential for synaptic plasticity and learning, and that neurodegenerative disease results in a significant decline in BDNF will be reviewed. The aim is to draw attention to the need for increasing patient-directed clinical studies to test the possible benefits of increasing levels of neurotrophins, specifically BDNF, to treat brain disorders. Much is known about the cellular mechanisms that underlie learning and memory in brain. It can be concluded that signaling by neurotrophins like BDNF and AMPA-type glutamate receptor synaptic trafficking are fundamental to these processes. Data from animal models and patients reveal that these mechanisms are adversely targeted during neurodegenerative disease and results in memory loss and cognitive decline. A brief summary of our understanding of these mechanisms indicates that it is time to apply this knowledge base directly to development of therapeutic treatments that enhance neurotrophins for brain disorders in patient populations.

Characterization and Transcriptional Activation of the Immediate Early Gene ARC During a Neural Correlate of Classical Conditioning

Plasticity and learning genes require regulatory mechanisms that have the flexibility to respond to a variety of sensory stimuli to generate adaptive behavioral responses. The immediate early gene (IEG) activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (ARC) is rapidly induced not only by neuronal stimulation but also during a variety of learning tasks. How ARC is regulated in response to complex stimuli during associative learning remains to be fully detailed. Here, we characterized the structure of the ARC gene in the pond turtle and mechanisms of its transcriptional activation during a neural correlate of eyeblink classical conditioning. The tARC gene is regulated in part by the presence of paused polymerase (RNAPII) that is poised at the promoter for rapid gene induction. Conditioning induces permissive chromatin modifications in the tARC promoter that allows binding by the transcription factor cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) within 5 min of training. During learning acquisition, the pausing factor negative elongation factor (NELF) dissociates from the promoter thereby releasing RNAPII for active transcription. Data additionally suggest that the DNA insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) is required for transcription by mediating a learning-induced interaction of the ARC promoter with an enhancer element. Our study suggests that the learning-inducible IEG tARC utilizes both paused RNAPII and rapid chromatin modifications that allow for dynamic gene responsiveness required when an organism is presented with a variety of environmental stimuli.

An Evolutionary Perspective on Why Food Overconsumption Impairs Cognition

Brain structures and neuronal networks that mediate spatial navigation, decision-making, sociality, and creativity evolved, in part, to enable success in food acquisition. Here, I discuss evidence suggesting that the reason that overconsumption of energy-rich foods negatively impacts cognition is that signaling pathways that evolved to respond adaptively to food scarcity are relatively disengaged in the setting of continuous food availability. Obesity impairs cognition and increases the risk for some psychiatric disorders and dementias. Moreover, maternal and paternal obesity predispose offspring to poor cognitive outcomes by epigenetic molecular mechanisms. Neural signaling pathways that evolved to bolster cognition in settings of food insecurity can be stimulated by intermittent fasting and exercise to support the cognitive health of current and future generations.

Genetics of language and its implications on language interventions

Genetic variation of language genes affect neurophysiology of brain and can thus influence the way people respond to environmental language input, leading to differences in terms of their response to environmental language learning. Conversely, language learning environment too can affect gene expressions through neuroepigenetic mechanisms, leading to increasedinterindividual differences. Further, language-related cognitive processes such as learning, working memory and perception; and language-related affective factors such as stress and positive emotion involve neuroplasticity, which is also epigenetically regulated. Language intervention methods must understand the extent and the type of difficulties, and must offer personalized learning andmedical solutions. Medical intervention in terms of epigenetics and neurotransmitter regulation is proposed in addition to effectiveteaching methods to aid in effective language acquisition.