Tissutal and Fluidic Aspects in Osteopathic Manual Therapy: A Narrative Review

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases

Chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) are debilitating and potentially lethal illnesses that affect a large proportion of the global population. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a manual therapy technique developed and performed by osteopathic physicians that facilitates the body's innate healing processes. Therefore, OMT may prove a beneficial anti-inflammatory modality useful in the management and treatment of CIDs. This work aims to objectively evaluate the therapeutic benefits of OMT in patients with various CIDs. In this review, a structured literature search was performed. The included studies involving asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, irritable bowel syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, and peripheral arterial disease were selected for this work. Various OMT modalities, including lymphatic, still, counterstain, and muscle energy techniques, were utilized. Control treatments included sham techniques, routine care, or no treatment. OMT utilization led to variable patient outcomes in individuals with pathologies linked to CID.

Comparative Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Fascial Infiltration versus Periarticular Administration of Autologous Conditioned Serum (Orthokine) for Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol Description

BACKGROUND Neck pain is a prevalent and burdensome health issue, with autologous conditioned serum (ACS), like Orthokine, being a recognized treatment for musculoskeletal conditions due to its anti-inflammatory effects. However, the optimal ACS administration method for neck pain remains unclear. The existing literature lacks robust evidence, especially for different injection techniques. This study aimed to compare ACS infiltration into cervical fascia with periarticular administration to determine if the former is as effective in alleviating neck pain, offering a novel approach to its management. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our study is designed to be a single-center, prospective, randomized trial involving 100 patients. Group A (n=50) will receive ACS through fascial infiltration at tender points under ultrasound guidance, with 4 doses administered every 3 days. Group B (n=50) will receive ACS injections in the articular column (facet joints) using the same dosing schedule. We will collect data at T0 (before therapy), T1 (6 weeks after therapy), and T2 (12 weeks after therapy), assessing outcomes with the Numerical Pain Scale (NRS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Dynamic Proprioception Test (DPT). RESULTS Enrollment begins in August 2023, and the study is set to conclude in July 2024. If data analysis, manuscript preparation, and peer review proceed smoothly, we anticipate publishing the results in late 2024 or early 2025. CONCLUSIONS If fascial infiltration with ACS proves equally effective as the standard periarticular method, it offers promise for patients on long-term anticoagulant treatment. Paravertebral injections in such cases carry a significant risk of bleeding, making ACS infiltration a potentially safer alternative for managing neck pain in these individuals.

Reconceptualizing Somatic Dysfunction in the Light of a Neuroaesthetic Enactive Paradigm

Background: Palpatory findings are considered a central element of osteopathic practice, especially when associated with a patient's altered regulative functions than with named somatic dysfunctions. Although osteopathic theories for somatic dysfunction could be plausible, the clinical applicability of the concept is debated, especially because it is largely related to simple cause-effect models of osteopathic care. In contrast to a linear kind of diagnosis of a "tissue as a producer of symptoms", this perspective article aims to provide a conceptual and operational framework in which the somatic dysfunction evaluation process is seen as a neuroaesthetic (en)active encounter between osteopath and patient. Subsections relevant to the subject: To summarize all concepts of the hypothesis, the enactive neuroaesthetics principles are proposed as a critical foundation for the osteopathic assessment and treatment of the person, specifically addressing a new paradigm for somatic dysfunction. Conclusions, and future directions: The present perspective article represents a proposition to blend technical rationality informed by neurocognitive and social sciences, and professional artistry clinical experience informed by traditional tenets, to overcome the controversy around somatic dysfunction, rather than dismissing the concept.

Beliefs and Use of Palpatory Findings in Osteopathic Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Descriptive Study among Italian Osteopaths

The Italian government has started the regulatory process of osteopathy to include it among the healthcare professions mentioning terms, such as “perceptual palpation” and “somatic dysfunction” within the professional profile. ‘Palpatory findings’ are one of the multidimensional aspects that can inform osteopathic clinical reasoning. The non-regulated educational system has led to heterogenic professionals working in Italy, thus, the aim of this study was to investigate how Italian experts use palpatory findings in their clinical practice. A total of 12 experts were selected to participate in four virtual focus groups. A qualitative inductive approach with a constructivist paradigm was chosen to describe the results. The themes that emerged were: osteopathic identity; evaluation; osteopathic diagnosis; and sharing with different recipients. Participants agreed on the peculiarity and distinctiveness of osteopathic palpation, but there was some disagreement on the clinical significance of the findings, highlighting a complex multidimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. The results seem to reflect the history of the profession in Italy, which has evolved quickly, leading professionals to seek new paradigms blending tradition and scientific evidence. The authors suggest further investigation to verify the state of art among osteopaths not involved in research or a broader consensus of the results.