Optimizing Time Management for Drip-and-Ship Stroke Patients Qualifying for Endovascular Therapy-A Single-Network Study

A simple, organized web-based system improved the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes for endovascular thrombectomy in regional stroke network

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a time-sensitive treatment for acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. To optimize transfer efficiency, a web-based platform was introduced in the Tainan Stroke Network (TSN). We assessed its application and effectiveness in regional stroke care.

METHOD

This new web-based platform containing a questionnaire-style interface was introduced on October 1, 2021. To assess the transfer efficiency and patient outcomes, acute stroke patients transferred from PSCs to CSC for EVT from April 01, 2020, to December 30, 2022, were enrolled. The patients were classified into the traditional transferal pathway (TTP) group and the new transferal pathway (NTP) group depending on mode of transfer. Patient characteristics, time segments after stroke onset and outcome were compared between groups.

RESULT

A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 77 in the TTP group and 27 in the NTP group. Compared to the TTP group, the NTP group had a significantly shorter onset-to-CSC door time (TTP vs. NTP: 267 vs. 198 min; p = 0.041) and a higher EVT rate (TTP vs. NTP: 18.2% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.002). Among EVT patients, those in the NTP group had a significantly shorter CSC door-to-puncture time (TTP vs. NTP: 131.5 vs. 110 min; p = 0.029). The NTP group had a higher rate of good functional outcomes at 3 months (TTP vs. NTP: 21% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

This new web-based EVT transfer system provides notable improvements in clinical outcomes, transfer efficiency, and EVT execution for potential EVT candidates without markedly changing the regional stroke care paradigm.

A hybrid strategy using an ambulance and a helicopter to convey thrombectomy candidates to definite care: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Mechanical thrombectomy is the treatment of choice for large vessel occlusion strokes done only in comprehensive stroke centres (CSC). We investigated whether the transportation time of thrombectomy candidates from another hospital district could be reduced by using an ambulance and a helicopter and how this affected their recovery.

METHODS

We prospectively gathered the time points of thrombectomy candidates referred to the Tampere University Hospital from the hospital district of Southern Ostrobothnia. Primary and secondary transports were included. In Hybrid transport, the helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) unit flew from an airport near the CSC to meet the patient during transport and continued the transport to definitive care. Ground transport was chosen only when the weather prevented flying, or the HEMS crew was occupied in another emergency. We contacted the patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy 90 days after the intervention and rated their recovery with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Favourable recovery was considered mRS 0-2.

RESULTS

During the study, 72 patients were referred to the CSC, 71% of which were first diagnosed at the PSC. Hybrid transport (n = 34) decreased the median time from the start of transport from the PSC to the computed tomography (CT) at the CSC when compared to Ground (n = 17) transport (84 min, IQR 82-86 min vs. 109 min, IQR 104-116 min, p < 0.001). The transport times straight from the scene to CT at the CSC were equal: median 93 min (IQR 80-102 min) in the Hybrid group (n = 11) and 97 min (IQR 91-108 min) in the Ground group (n = 10, p = 0.28). The percentages of favourable recovery were 74% and 50% in the Hybrid and Ground transport groups (p = 0.38) from the PSC. Compared to Ground transportation from the scene, Hybrid transportation had less effect on the positive recovery percentages of 60% and 50% (p = 1.00), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Adding a HEMS unit to transporting a thrombectomy candidate from a PSC to CSC decreases the transport time compared to ambulance use only. This study showed minimal difference in the recovery after thrombectomy between Hybrid and Ground transports.