Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of Prevalence, Incidence, and Survival in a Hospital-Based Study in Ecuador

Impact of sex differences on patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms during hospital admission

Background

Sex disparities are known modifiers of health and disease. In neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), sex-based differences have been observed in the epidemiology and treatment-related side effects.

Objectives

To examine sex differences in demographics, diagnoses present during hospital admission, comorbidities, and outcomes of hospital course among hospitalized patients with NENs.

Design

Retrospective analysis.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of sex differences was performed on patients with NENs discharged from U.S. community hospitals in 2019 from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Results

A total of 7334 patients with NENs were identified; 4284 patients had primary NENs, and 3050 patients had metastatic NENs. In total, 48.7% were males and 51.3% were females. Distributions of race and ethnicity, and payer types differed by sex (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027, respectively). For race and ethnicity, there were more females in White, Black, and Native American races, and Hispanic ethnicity. For payer types, female predominance was seen with Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, and self-pay groups. Sex differences were seen in diagnosis made during hospital stay. In all NENs, oral (p = 0.036) and neurologic (p < 0.001) diagnoses were more common in females; ascites (p = 0.002), dysphagia (p = 0.002), biliary ductal obstruction (p = 0.014), and jaundice (p = 0.048) were more common in males. In primary NENs, ascites (p < 0.001) was male predominant. In metastatic NENs, dysphagia (p = 0.003) and jaundice (p = 0.034) were male predominant, whereas females had more headaches (p < 0.001). Nausea and vomiting were female predominant in all NENs (p < 0.001), primary (p = 0.044), and metastatic (p < 0.001) NENs. For comorbidities, arthropathies (p < 0.001), depression (p < 0.001), hypothyroidism (p < 0.001), other thyroid disorders (p < 0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (p = 0.002), and obesity (p < 0.001) were female predominant.

Conclusion

There were sex differences in the race and ethnicity, payer types, diagnoses present during hospital admission, and comorbidities among the 2019 NIS hospital discharge sample of patients with NENs.

Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A comprehensive analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic implications of gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs).

METHODS

A retrospective enrollment of 142 patients diagnosed with g-NENs was conducted at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2021. The study compared essential clinicopathological features and survival rates. Additionally, the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas/mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NEC/MiNEN) were contrasted with those of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC).

RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 142 g-NENs cases, with a male-to-female ratio of approximately 2:1. The 5-year survival rates for g-NEC and g-MiNEN were 26.7% and 35.2%, respectively. Corresponding 5-year survival rates for G1 and G2 were observed at 100% and 80.0%, respectively. g-NEC/MiNEN showed a significantly worse prognosis compared to g-NET (p < 0.001). g-NEC/MiNEN exhibited a poor prognosis compared to GAC (p < 0.001), and within poorly differentiated GAC, g-NEC/MiNEN demonstrated a worse prognosis (p = 0.007). Additionally, patients receiving postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited notably prolonged overall survival (OS) in the case of g-NEC/MiNEN (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

In short, the prognosis of g-NEC/MiNEN was worse than that of g-NET, GAC and poorly differentiated GAC, but this group benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Survival of 48866 cancer patients: results from Nantong area, China

Objective

This study aimed to provide a realistic observation of survival by major site for 48,866 cancer patients treated at a tertiary cancer hospital in a rural area of China.

Methods

Patients with cancer registered between 2007 and 2017 in the Nantong rural area were followed up. The starting date for survival calculation was the date of the first diagnosis of cancer at the Nantong Tumor Hospital, and the closing date was December 31, 2020. Observed survival (OS) was analyzed according to ICD-10 site, sex, age, region, and hospitalization period using the life table method and compared using the Wilcoxon (Gehan) statistic.

Results

The overall 5-year OS rate was 40.48% for all 48,866 patients, 30.19% for males, and 51.90% for females. The top five cancer sites, accounting for 60.51% of the total cases, were the esophagus, lung, stomach, liver, and cervix, with 5-year OS rates of 33.72%, 18.64%, 32.10%, 19.04%, and 71.51%, respectively. The highest 5-year OS was observed in the thyroid (87.52%) and the lowest was in the pancreas (6.37%). Survival was significantly higher in younger patients than in older patients, with 5-year OSs of 69.26% and 19.84% in those aged 20-29 and 90-99 years, respectively. Five-year OSs improved significantly from 39.35% in 2007-2011 to 41.26% in 2012-2017.

Conclusion

Overall survival improved over the years, although the improvement at some sites was not significant. The observed survival varies from region to region, reflecting differences in the patterns of major sites, disparities in proportions of hospitalization, and demographic characteristics.