1
|
Torbjørnsen A, Spildo I, Mollestad MA, Jensen AL, Singstad T, Weldingh NM, Joranger P, Ribu L, Holmen H. Investigating Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patient-Centered Diabetes Specialist Outpatient Care (DigiDiaS): Protocol for a Multimethod Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e52766. [PMID: 38441955 PMCID: PMC10951827 DOI: 10.2196/52766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living with type 1 diabetes is challenging, and to support self-management, repeated consultations in specialist outpatient care are often required. The emergence of new digital solutions has revolutionized how health care services can be patient centered, providing unprecedented opportunities for flexible, high-quality care. However, there is a lack of studies exploring how the use of digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for flexible specialist care affects diabetes self-management. To provide new knowledge on the relevance of using PROMs in standard care, we have designed a multimethod prospective study. OBJECTIVE The overall aim of this protocol is to describe our prospective multimethod observational study designed to investigate digital PROMs in a routine specialist outpatient setting for flexible patient-centered diabetes care (DigiDiaS). METHODS This protocol outlines the design of a multimethod prospective observational cohort study that includes data from electronic health records, self-reported questionnaires, clinical consultation field observations, and individual in-depth interviews with patients and diabetes health care personnel. All patients with type 1 diabetes at a designated outpatient clinic were invited to participate and use the digital PROM implemented in clinical care. Both users and nonusers of the digital PROM were eligible for the prospective study, allowing for a comparison of the two groups. Data were collected at baseline and after 12 months, including self-management as the primary outcome assessed using the Patient Activation Measure, along with the secondary outcomes of digital health literacy, quality of life, health economy, and clinical variables such as glycated hemoglobin. RESULTS The digital solution was implemented for routine clinical care in the department in November 2021, and data collection for the prospective study started in October 2022. As of September 6, 2023, 84.6% (186/220) of patients among those in the digital PROM and 15.5% (34/220) of patients among the nonusers have consented to participate. We expect the study to have enough participants by the autumn of 2023. With 1 year of follow-up, the results are expected by spring 2025. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, a multimethod prospective observational cohort study can offer valuable insights into the relevance, effectiveness, and acceptability of digital tools using PROMs in diabetes specialist care. Such knowledge is crucial for achieving broad and successful implementation and use of these tools in a large diabetes outpatient clinic. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/52766.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Torbjørnsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingeborg Spildo
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maria Aadland Mollestad
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- SDCA-Steno Diabetes Centre, Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tone Singstad
- Division of Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway
| | - Nina Mickelson Weldingh
- Division of Research and Innovation, Department of Research Support Service, Akershus University Hospital, Akershus, Norway
| | - Pål Joranger
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lis Ribu
- The Centre for Senior Citizen Staff, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Holmen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University - OsloMet, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouloukaki I, Christodoulakis A, Margetaki K, Aravantinou Karlatou A, Tsiligianni I. Exploring the Link between Social Support and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:544. [PMID: 38470655 PMCID: PMC10930953 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12050544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
We aimed to explore the link between social support and various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care patients with COPD. This was a cross-sectional study with 168 patients with COPD from six primary care centers in Crete, Greece. We collected data on sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, disease-specific quality of life, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), fatigue, the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), phycological parameters, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, sleep complaints, the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, the Athens Insomnia scale (AIS), and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Social support was measured using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Out of 168 patients with COPD, 114 (68.9%) exhibited low levels of social support. Low social support (MSPSS total ≤ 5) was positively associated with COPD symptoms (CAT score ≥ 10) (OR = 3.97, 95%CI:1.86-8.44; p < 0.01), fatigue (FSS ≥ 36) (OR = 2.74, 95%CI:1.31-5.74; p = 0.01), and insomnia symptoms (AIS ≥ 6) (OR = 5.17 95%CI:2.23-12.01; p < 0.01), while the association with depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) was marginally significant (OR = 3.1, 95%CI:0.93-10.36; p = 0.07). Our results suggest that lower levels of social support are positively associated with PROMs in patients with COPD. Therefore, our findings show an additional way to improve the overall health of patients with COPD in primary care by putting social support at the epicenter of actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izolde Bouloukaki
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (A.C.); (K.M.); (A.A.K.); (I.T.)
| | - Antonios Christodoulakis
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (A.C.); (K.M.); (A.A.K.); (I.T.)
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Katerina Margetaki
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (A.C.); (K.M.); (A.A.K.); (I.T.)
| | - Antonia Aravantinou Karlatou
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (A.C.); (K.M.); (A.A.K.); (I.T.)
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (A.C.); (K.M.); (A.A.K.); (I.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pana BC, Radu CP, Furtunescu FL, Mociu A, Ciufu N. Utility and Utilization of Patient-Reported Experience Measures for the Supplementary COVID-19 Protective Actions at the Ovidius Clinical Hospital in Romania. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:377. [PMID: 38338262 PMCID: PMC10855417 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) provide assessments of patients' subjective experiences and perceptions regarding their interactions with the healthcare system and its services. We present a cross-sectional study of the patient perception and evolution of COVID-19 cases performed at Ovidius Clinical Hospital in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study objective is to explore the utility and the utilization of PREMs in monitoring patient perceptions of the supplementary protective actions. During the pandemic, the hospital implemented early supplementary protective actions, like PCR and lung CT, to all surgically admitted patients in the hospital alongside government-recommended actions. At the same time, functional PREMs were used to evaluate patient perceptions regarding these supplementary actions. The research was carried out for 19 months between June 2020 and December 2021. The findings revealed that opinions about the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the personal risk of infection, and the perception of protective actions in the hospital were not correlated. Conclusions: The patients' appreciation of the COVID-19 protective actions taken by the hospital is related more to the general perceptions induced by the number of cases presented in the mass media and less by perceptions of the gravity of the problem or the risk of infection. In a hospital, the primary mission of patient safety is essential, and it must be fulfilled even if the patients are not sure or fully convinced that this is for their benefit. For management decisions and monitoring, using PREMs can be essential in a situation when general evidence is not conclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogdan C. Pana
- Department of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050463 Bucharest, Romania; (B.C.P.); (F.L.F.)
| | - Ciprian Paul Radu
- Department of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050463 Bucharest, Romania; (B.C.P.); (F.L.F.)
| | - Florentina L. Furtunescu
- Department of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050463 Bucharest, Romania; (B.C.P.); (F.L.F.)
| | - Adrian Mociu
- Ovidius Clinical Hospital, 905900 Constanta, Romania; (A.M.); (N.C.)
| | - Nicolae Ciufu
- Ovidius Clinical Hospital, 905900 Constanta, Romania; (A.M.); (N.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aravantinou-Karlatou A, Bouloukaki I, Christodoulakis A, Tsiligianni I. The Influence of Social Support in PROMs of Patients with COPD in Primary Care: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3141. [PMID: 38132031 PMCID: PMC10742576 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a prevalent and multidimensional disease with symptoms that greatly influence patients' health. Healthcare professionals utilize patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to classify and better manage the disease. Despite the value of PROMs, they inadequately represent some important dimensions of COPD, like social support and healthcare access/utilization. This is important, especially for social support, since it can positively influence PROMs results and the overall health of patients with COPD. Therefore, a scoping review was conducted to determine how social support affects PROMs of patients with COPD in primary care. The PRISMA-Scoping approach was adopted, and we sought articles published in MEDLINE and COHRANE. We screened 2038 articles for inclusion and finally included a total of 10 articles. Most of the articles were conducted in the U.S. and Norway. Social support had a strong positive impact on PROMs. Additionally, different types of social support were observed. Moreover, higher levels of social support were linked to better quality of life, mental health, self-care behaviors, self-management, functionality, and less severe COPD. Consequently, this scoping review highlights the value of social support in patients with COPD and its underrepresentation and misrepresentation in PROMs literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Aravantinou-Karlatou
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| | - Izolde Bouloukaki
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| | - Antonios Christodoulakis
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Ioanna Tsiligianni
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes-Stavrakia, 71003 Heraklion, Greece; (I.B.); (A.C.); (I.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Torbjørnsen A, Jensen AL, Singstad T, Weldingh NM, Holmen H. Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2023; 11:e003628. [PMID: 37963648 PMCID: PMC10649597 DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are increasingly used in clinical diabetes care to increase patient involvement and improve healthcare services. The objectives were to identify instruments used to measure PROs in outpatient diabetes clinics and to investigate the use of these PRO measures alongside the experiences of patients and healthcare personnel in a clinical setting. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A scoping review was conducted according to the framework of Arksey and O'Malley with scoping searches of Cinahl, EMBASE, Medline and Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Studies reporting on adults with diabetes in a clinical setting where the PRO measure response directly affected patient care were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS In total, 35 197 citations were identified, of which 7 reports presenting 4 different PRO measures were included in the review. All four of the included items measured psychosocial aspects of diabetes, and three included elements of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale. All the patients were satisfied with the use of PRO measures in clinical care, whereas the level of satisfaction among healthcare personnel with PRO measures varied within and among studies. CONCLUSIONS The limited number of eligible studies in this review suggests that research on PRO measures for diabetes outpatient care is scarce. Patients welcome the opportunity to express their concerns through the systematic collection of PRO measures, and some healthcare personnel value the broader insight that PRO measures provide into the impact of diabetes on patients' lives. However, the heterogeneity among services and among patients challenges the implementation of PRO measures. Research is needed to explore how PRO measures in clinical outpatient care affect healthcare personnel workflow. REVIEW REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/46AHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Torbjørnsen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Health Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Steno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Tone Singstad
- Department of Endocrinology Outpatient Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| | | | - Heidi Holmen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Intervention Centre, Oslo Universitetssykehus, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Damps-Konstańska I, Ciećko W, Jassem E, Bandurski T, Bosek D, Olszewska-Karaban M, Bandurska E. Polish Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the PREM-C9 Questionnaire for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2746. [PMID: 37893819 PMCID: PMC10606810 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11202746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, preventable, and treatable disease. The first PREM (patient-reported outcome measure)-type questionnaire that has been dedicated to assess the experience of care in COPD is the PREM-C9. Aim: The aim of this study was to create a Polish version of the PREM-C9 and determine its psychometric characteristics. Methods: The validation procedure involved forward and back translation. We included 42 patients with COPD. The psychometric properties were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, Bartlett's test, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed using a principal component analysis for the extracted principal components. The validity of the factor analysis was demonstrated using Bartlett's sphericity test and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test. A factor analysis was performed using the Oblimin and Varimax rotation. The reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: The Polish version of the analyzed questionnaire met all the validation criteria: face, translation, psychometric, functional, and reconstruction equivalence. Spearman's correlation results between the Polish PREM-C9 and CAT were as follows: rho = 0.44, p = 0.003539; HADS-Anxiety: rho = 0.370864, p = 0.015612; and HADS-Depression: rho = 0.387405, p = 0.011253. Conclusions: The developed Polish PREM-C9 questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool that assesses Polish COPD patients' experiences of their disease and the care they receive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Weronika Ciećko
- Center for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland; (W.C.); (D.B.); (E.B.)
| | - Ewa Jassem
- Division of Pulmonology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Tomasz Bandurski
- Division of Radiology Informatics and Statistics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | - Dominika Bosek
- Center for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland; (W.C.); (D.B.); (E.B.)
| | | | - Ewa Bandurska
- Center for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland; (W.C.); (D.B.); (E.B.)
| |
Collapse
|