Orthopedic Professionals' Recognition and Knowledge of Pain and Perceived Barriers to Optimal Pain Management at Five Hospitals

Barriers to Pediatric Postoperative Pain Management-Interprofessional Focus Group Interviews

BACKGROUND

Historically, postoperative pain management of children in hospitals has been inadequate, despite advancements in pain physiology and management. Postoperative pain correlates with increased complications, psychological harm, and parental stress, leading to inefficiencies in resource utilization and prolonged hospital stays. Effective pain management relies on organizational, collaborative, and individual efforts, with interprofessional communication and cooperation being crucial.

AIM

This study aims to explore healthcare professionals' experiences with barriers to effective pediatric postoperative pain management through interprofessional focus group interviews, aiming to address gaps in understanding and improve care.

METHODS

Data collection was performed using focus group interviews with twelve healthcare professionals from four surgical wards. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcriptions were coded and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis by two researchers independently.

RESULTS

Our study aligns with prior research on barriers, revealing issues such as lack of competence among physicians and nurses, limited availability of skilled personnel, heavy workloads, and absence of standardized protocols. These barriers largely reflect resource limitations and resonate with existing literature. Additionally, our findings highlight differences in perceptions between nurses and physicians regarding opioid use and standardized pain assessment tools, underscoring potential barriers to optimal pediatric postoperative pain management.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the importance of adhering to standardized, evidence-based pain management protocols, revealing a link to inadequate leadership at the hospital and department levels. Noncompliance may stem from professional inexperience and lack of trust between healthcare professionals, necessitating interprofessional dialogues facilitated by leaders to foster a culture of evidence-based pediatric care.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Establishing best practices and ensuring adherence is a leadership responsibility. Furthermore, a lack of adherence to established routines of pain management might be a consequence of professional inexperience and lack of competence, as well as a symptom of lack of trust between professions and professionals. It is important that leaders of both nurses and physicians facilitate arenas for discussing these topics. A culture of evidence-based PPPM needs to be interprofessional and inclusive of different perspectives and facilitate open discussions.

Perioperative pain management intervention in older patients with hip fracture in an orthogeriatric unit. A controlled before/after study assessing an audit and feedback intervention (PAIN-AGE)

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain delays ambulation, extends hospital stay, reduces the probability of recovery, and increases risk of long-term functional impairment. Pain management in hip fractured patients poses a challenge to the healthcare teams. Older adults are more vulnerable to opioid-associated side effect and it is primordial to minimize their exposure to opioids. Acetaminophen is associated with reduced opioid use so we need to focus on acetaminophen use in first-line analgesia.

METHODS

We conducted a controlled before/after study to assess the ability of an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention built with nurses to improve the quality of perioperative pain management in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture in an orthogeriatric unit (experimental group) versus a conventional orthopedic unit (no A&F intervention). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the three postoperative days, before and after the A&F intervention. Secondary endpoints included nurses' adherence to medical prescriptions, clinical data associated with patients and finally factors associated with intervention. The significative level was set at 0.05 for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We studied data from 397 patients (mean age 89 years, 75% female). During the postoperative period, 16% of patients from the experimental group received 3 g/day of acetaminophen before the A&F intervention; the percentage reached 60% after the intervention. The likelihood of receiving 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the postoperative period and adhering to the medical prescription of acetaminophen were significantly increased in the experimental group as compared with the control group. The patient's functional status at discharge (assessed by Activities of Daily Living scores) was significantly better and the length of hospital stay significantly reduced after the A&F intervention.

CONCLUSION

Our controlled before/after study showed that an A&F intervention significantly improved perioperative pain management in older adults hospitalized for hip fracture. Involving teams in continuous education programs appears crucial to improve the quality of pain management and ensure nurses' adherence to medical prescriptions.

Pediatric and emergency medicine resident comfort assessing and treating pediatric pain across pediatric age groups

Aim: Assess pediatric and emergency medicine (EM) resident comfort treating and assessing pediatric pain. Materials & methods: Pediatric and EM residents at a single institution (SIUH Northwell Health in New York) completed an anonymous survey 6 months into the academic year regarding comfort assessing and treating pediatric pain. Results: A total of 40 (16/24 EM and 24/24 pediatric) residents completed this survey: 20% (8/24) pediatric first year residents, 40% (16/40) pediatric second year and above, 20% (8/40) EM first year and 20% (8/40) EM second year and above. A 46% (11/24) pediatric and 12% (2/16) EM residents were comfortable assessing neonatal pain (p < 0.05). A 38% (9/24) pediatric residents were comfortable treating neonatal pain compared with 12% (2/16) EM residents (p < 0.05). Both resident groups reported increasing comfort assessing and treating pain with increasing patient age. Conclusion: Both residents groups reported limitations in comfort assessing and treating pediatric pain, especially in younger patients. Education for both groups is important to optimize pediatric pain management.

Sickle cell disease chronic joint pain: Clinical assessment based on maladaptive central nervous system plasticity

Chronic joint pain (CJP) is among the significant musculoskeletal comorbidities in sickle cell disease (SCD) individuals. However, many healthcare professionals have difficulties in understanding and evaluating it. In addition, most musculoskeletal evaluation procedures do not consider central nervous system (CNS) plasticity associated with CJP, which is frequently maladaptive. This review study highlights the potential mechanisms of CNS maladaptive plasticity related to CJP in SCD and proposes reliable instruments and methods for musculoskeletal assessment adapted to those patients. A review was carried out in the PubMed and SciELO databases, searching for information that could help in the understanding of the mechanisms of CNS maladaptive plasticity related to pain in SCD and that presented assessment instruments/methods that could be used in the clinical setting by healthcare professionals who manage chronic pain in SCD individuals. Some maladaptive CNS plasticity mechanisms seem important in CJP, including the impairment of pain endogenous control systems, central sensitization, motor cortex reorganization, motor control modification, and arthrogenic muscle inhibition. Understanding the link between maladaptive CNS plasticity and CJP mechanisms and its assessment through accurate instruments and methods may help healthcare professionals to increase the quality of treatment offered to SCD patients.

Educational Intervention to Strengthen Pediatric Postoperative Pain Management: A Cluster Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pediatric postoperative pain is still undertreated.

AIMS

To assess whether educational intervention increases nurses' knowledge and improves pediatric postoperative pain management.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial with three measurement points (baseline T1, 1 month after intervention T2, and 6 months after intervention T3).

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

The study was conducted in postanesthesia care units at six hospitals in Norway. Nurses working with children in the included units and children who were undergoing surgery were invited to participate in this study.

METHODS

Nurses were cluster randomized by units to an intervention (n = 129) or a control group (n = 129). This allocation was blinded for participants at baseline. Data were collected using "The Pediatric Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain: Norwegian Version" (primary outcome), observations of nurses' clinical practice, and interviews with children. The intervention included an educational day, clinical supervision, and reminders.

RESULTS

At baseline 193 nurses completed the survey (75% response rate), 143 responded at T2, and 107 at T3. Observations of nurses' (n = 138) clinical practice included 588 children, and 38 children were interviewed. The knowledge level increased from T1 to T3 in both groups, but there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. In the intervention group, there was an improvement between T1 and T2 in the total PNKAS-N score (70% vs. 83%), observed increase use of pain assessment tools (17% vs. 39%), and children experienced less moderate-to-severe pain.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was observed between the groups after intervention, but a positive change in knowledge and practice was revealed in both groups. Additional studies are needed to explore the most potent variables to strengthen pediatric postoperative pain management.

Expert review and recommendations for the management of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain in Qatar

BACKGROUND

Pain management is an evolving area of expertise in Qatar. Gaps in knowledge, inadequate training for physicians and nurses, and the absence of policies/guidelines are the main barriers to effective pain management in Qatar. In addition, the use of certain pain medication, especially opioids, is highly regulated, limiting their availability in outpatient pain management. These factors are responsible for the undertreatment of pain in Qatar. This study aimed to standardize evidence-based local recommendations for pharmacological treatment of pain in Qatar.

METHODS

An expert panel of physicians from different disciplines, with experience in diagnosis and treatment of the three pain types (i.e., acute, chronic, and neuropathic), was convened for two face-to-face meetings in Doha, Qatar, on November 29, 2019, and on February 22, 2020, with subsequent virtual meetings. A literature search was performed on Medline and Google Scholar databases from inception till December 2019, and all relevant articles were selected. Based on these articles and repeated feedback from the authors, the final pain treatment protocols were developed.

RESULTS

Recommendations for the treatment of acute pain, based on pain severity, followed three approaches: acetaminophen/paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for mild pain and moderate pain and referral to a pain specialist for severe pain. Acetaminophen/paracetamol or NSAIDs is recommended for chronic pain, and the use of opioids was strongly discouraged because of its long-term side effects. For neuropathic pain, tricyclic antidepressants or gabapentin or pregabalin or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors were recommended first-line agents. Non-responders must be referred to neurologists or a pain specialist.

CONCLUSION

The expert panel provides recommendations for the management of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain based on international guidelines adapted to local practice and treatment availability in Qatar. More importantly, the panel has recommended taking extreme caution in the use of opioids for long-term management of chronic pain and to refer the patient to a pain specialist clinician as required.

Older Women and Opioid Analgesia after Breast Cancer Surgery

PURPOSE

To explore which factors influence opioid analgesia use in older women during the 48-hour period after hospital discharge following initial breast cancer surgery.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional, descriptive study involved a cohort (n = 57) of older women recruited for a larger study of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We gathered patient-reported data pertinent to perioperative and post-discharge pain control. Data were analyzed using linear regression to explore those characteristics that had the greatest influence on the amount of post-discharge opioid analgesia required.

RESULTS

After hospital discharge, 29 older women (51%) with breast cancer avoided opioid analgesia for various reasons. The number of prescribed opioid tablets each woman self-administered determined the total dosage of analgesia required 48 hours post-discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of this sample of older women with early-stage breast cancer experienced adequate pain relief after surgery and required little or no postoperative or postdischarge opioid analgesia. Optimization of the pain control experience for older women with breast cancer requires thorough pain assessment from diagnosis through survivorship through the end of life. This can be achieved by equipping women in this population to advocate for their pain control needs in real time. Future studies that elucidate preferences, beliefs, and current pain control practices before, during, and after breast cancer surgery will improve safety and efficacy of pain control for this fast-growing population.