Cost-Utility Analysis of Home Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

The economic evaluation of ALS care: quality and cost

Objective: The study aims to analyze the quality of studies that make economic evaluations for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Assessing the quality of studies can guide policy-making and planning. Methods: One of the most recognized checklists "The Consensus on Health Economic Criteria" (CHEC)-list designed by Evers et al. in 2005 aims to answer two important questions: is the methodology of the study appropriate, and are the results of the study valid? We reviewed studies focusing on ALS and its economic costs, and evaluated the studies with (CHEC)-list. Results: We examined 25 articles in terms of their cost evaluation and quality. It is seen that they mainly focus on medical costs, ignoring social care costs. When the quality of the studies is examined, it is seen that the studies overall achieve high scores in terms of their purpose and research question, but some of the studies score low in terms of ethical dimension, comprehensiveness of expenditure items, their application of sensitivity analyses and their study design. Conclusions: The main recommendation of our study for future cost evaluation studies is that they should focus on the questions in the checklist that are scored low overall by the 25 articles, and consider the social care costs as well as medical costs. Our recommendations when designing cost studies can be applied to other chronic diseases with long-term economic costs like ALS.

Building a home ventilation programme: population, equipment, delivery and cost

Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) improves quality of life and survival in patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD). Developing countries may benefit from published evidence regarding the prevalence, cost of equipment, technical issues and organisation of HMV in NMD, facilitating the development of local turn-key HMV programmes. Unfortunately, such evidence is scattered in the existing literature. We searched Medline for publications in English and French from 2005 to 2020. This narrative review analyses 24 international programmes of HMV. The estimated prevalence (min-max) of HMV is ±7.3/100 000 population (1.2-47), all disorders combined. The prevalence of HMV is associated with the gross domestic product per capita in these 24 countries. The prevalence of NMD is about 30/100 000 population, of which ±10% would use HMV. Nocturnal (8/24 hour), discontinuous (8-16/24 hours) and continuous (>16/24 hours) ventilation is likely to concern about 60%, 20% and 20% of NMD patients using HMV. A minimal budget of about 168€/patient/year (504€/100 000 population), including the cost of equipment solely, should address the cost of HMV equipment in low-income countries. When services and maintenance are included, the budget can drastically increase up to between 3232 and 5760€/patient/year. Emerging programmes of HMV in developing countries reveal the positive impact of international cooperation. Today, at least 12 new middle, and low-income countries are developing HMV programmes. This review with updated data on prevalence, technical issues, cost of equipment and services for HMV should trigger objective dialogues between the stakeholders (patient associations, healthcare professionals and politicians); potentially leading to the production of workable strategies for the development of HMV in patients with NMD living in developing countries.